Mobile payments in Japan, South Korea and China: Cross-border convergence or divergence of business models?
Introduction
As of the first quarter of 2015, the number of global mobile subscribers was reported to have reached 7.1 billion, and the number of mobile lines in service was expected to surpass the world׳s population later that year (Telegeography, 2015). Mobile devices such as smartphones, Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs), tablets, and e-books readers are gradually replacing traditional personal computers as the main means of accessing the Internet, leveraging the widely deployed 3G/4G telecommunication technologies. This proliferation of mobile devices has created unparalleled opportunities for mobile commerce (Chen, 2012), and mobile phones have been serving a variety of customers as a multi-sided platform (Campbell-Kelly, Garcia-Swartz, Lam, & Yang, 2014).
Secure, reliable and economical modes of payment play a critical role in the successful implementation of mobile commerce (Lu, Yang, Chau, & Cao, 2011). Mobile payments, also known as “mobile phone payments” or “m-payments”, are payments for goods, services, and bills/invoices with a mobile device, such as a mobile phone, smart-phone, or PDA, by taking advantage of mobile telecommunications networks or proximity technologies (Dahlberg, Mallat, Ondrus, & Zmijewska, 2008). Typically, the user decides to make a mobile payment, is then connected to a server via the mobile device for authentication and authorization, and once the transaction is executed, provided a statement of confirmation.
Mobile payment systems show wide disparities in rates of penetration in different national markets. In general, they have been slow to diffuse in Europe, the United States and other countries where the credit system is mature and well-established and the credit card payment system is very popular (Ghezzi et al., 2010, Kapoor, Dwivedi, & Williams (2013), Nickerson (2013), Perez, Rosa, Medeiros, & Comar (2013)). With access to comparatively less developed consumer banking and credit card systems, consumers in Japan and South Korea were very quick to adopt mobile payments, with the result that mobile payment markets in those countries are more mature (Okazaki, 2006).
In this paper we compare three Asia countries: Japan, South Korea and China in terms industry structure of their mobile payment industries, strategic alliances between firms, and government regulation. All three are major mobile markets. As of 2015, there were about 1.29 billion mobile subscribers in China (MIIT, 2015), 148 million in Japan (TCA, 2014) and 56 million in South Korea (Heraldcorp, 2014). While Japan and South Korea are global leaders in mobile payments, China׳s market is currently relatively less-developed, showing patchy development—with some regions far ahead of the others—in many technologies and applications, such as bill payment, mobile ticketing and remittances (Choi & Collins, 2007). With the country still building up its national credit system and the credit card market still very small compared to cash transactions, there are great opportunities in China for the deployment of mobile payment. At the same time, the competition among mobile operators, banks (and bank unions) and third-party payment platforms has accelerated the development of mobile payment in China. Consequently, the market has shown striking growth rates in recent years: transaction volume increased from 1219.7 billion yuan in 2013 to 5992.5 billion yuan in 2014, and is expected to be 18,000 billion yuan in 2018, making China the biggest market in the world (People (2012), People (2015)). It is therefore important to investigate the current models for mobile payments in China, and its possible evolutionary trajectory as the industry continues to grow.
Milner (2003) proposed that the adoption of a new technology in one country affects adoption in other countries, by demonstrating market potential as well as by providing improved models from which the early bugs and kinks have been removed. Competitive pressures created by the globalized market would affect the success rates of technology adoption in similar countries (Putsis, Balasubramanian, Kaplan, & Sen, 1997). Eliashberg and Helsen (1995) measured the effect of early and rapid product diffusion in one country and its subsequent effect on diffusion in another country. In this paper, we explore the possible evolutionary paths of operational models for mobile payments in China, comparing it to the longer-established and more advanced models in Japan and South Korea. Specifically, we examine whether the Chinese mobile payment model would converge to that of either Japan or South Korea, as it continues to develop, or whether we might expect a unique pattern of development. We contend that a critically important factor is regulation, specifically the type of restrictions placed on industry structure and market entry. Accordingly, we also examine the differences in the regulatory environment for banking and mobile payments in the three countries.
Selecting Japan and South Korea as cases of comparison to China was based on the following considerations: First, Japan and South Korea were early leaders in mobile payment implementation (Okazaki, 2006). Second, Japan, South Korea and China share similar socio-cultural characteristics such as trust in institutions, acceptance of technology, and comparable attitudes regarding privacy and security—all possible influences on adoption of mobile payment. Third, the three countries also have comparable penetration of mobile subscribers and mobile Internet consumers (Akematsu, Shinohara, & Tsuji (2012), Lim et al. (2012); Lu et al., 2011). Finally, an extensive literature exists on the mobile payment industry in Japan and Korea (see survey of literature in Dahlberg et al, 2008), while China has attracted much less attention (for examples, see Wu, 2008; Wang, 2008; Shi & Shuai, 2009). Nevertheless, many authors also point to the enormous growth potential of the mobile payment industry in China and the importance of developments in the early stages to influence the future trajectory of the industry (Zmijewska and Lawrence, 2006, Men & Song (2007); Zhou (2009a), Zhou (2009b)). Only a few scholars have compared China with other nations (Liu, Yang, & Lv (2008), Wang (2009)).
This paper is organized as following. Section 2 reviews the previous literature on the mobile payment industry, also identifying a typology of mobile payment operational models. Section 3 examines the laws and regulations relevant to the operation of the banking sector and the mobile payment industry. Section 4 analyzes the mobile payment models in South Korea, Japan and China with a selection of two cases for each, illustrative of specific features of the mobile payment markets in that country. Section 5 discusses the possible future evolutionary paths for the mobile payment operational model in China, especially in the context of recently-announced regulatory policies on major players in the mobile payment value chain. Section 6 presents the critical differences that may explain why the operational models for mobile payment have not converged in China. Finally, Section 7 concludes the paper.
Section snippets
Major themes in the mobile payments literature
An extensive literature, both theoretical and empirical, exists on the mobile payment industry. An excellent overview of the early literature from 1999 to 2006 is provided by Dahlberg et al (2008). Building on this literature, scholars have conducted studies of factors predicting consumer acceptance (Schierz, Schilke, & Wirtz (2010), Yang, Lu, Gupta, Cao, & Zhang (2012)); the value chain in mobile payments (Lu, Dong, & Wang (2007), Yang & Yang (2007), Zhou (2009a), Zhou (2009b), Zhao (2010)),
Regulation
Bauer (2014) noted that prevailing theories about the functioning of market sectors are not adequate, if their environments cannot be approximated as static or steady-state problems. Policy-making in rapidly changing technological environments present a challenge because existing conceptual and theoretical frameworks break down. This is certainly the case with mobile payments. In many countries, nascent mobile payment systems typically are not yet covered by their own regulatory regimes, and
Mobile payments in Japan
Japanese payment businesses emerged on the market in 2004 and have since then developed quite fast (Xiao, 2012). The reason for this fast growth was the relatively underdeveloped state of the credit card business. In Japan, cash has always been in more widespread use than credit cards, due to government regulations that limited banks׳ opportunities to issue credit cards. Credit cards issued by Japanese banks were de facto debit cards which required consumers to bundle their credit and banking
Emerging models in the Chinese mobile payment industry
In this section, we’ll discuss the potential operational models of mobile payments in China. First, we assess the external environment of the mobile payment industry, including regulations and laws as well as the market׳s characteristics in China. Then, we talk about the conduct of different actors, and finally summarize the current market performance.
Discussion
The objective of this paper was to explore the possible evolutionary paths of operational models for mobile payments in China, comparing it to the longer-established and more advanced models in Japan and South Korea. The extensive literature on Japan’s and South Korea׳s mobile payment industry allowed the identification of mobile payment operating models prevalent in those countries. In Japan, the mobile operator, using an opportunity created by regulation, established mobile payment systems
Conclusions and future work
This paper presents the evolution of mobile payment systems in China, South Korea and Japan, and especially the operational models developed in these countries. By comparing China to the other two countries in parallel, we summarize several key findings for mobile payment in Chinese market, and propose its possible evolutionary direction. For policy makers and market players, the following implications derived from the paper are important.
The first recommendation, to policy-makers, is based on
Acknowledgement
This paper is partially supported by Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant: 71490722), and MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (Grant: 10XJC79000).
References (99)
- et al.
Empirical analysis of factors promoting the Japanese 3G mobile phone
Telecommunications Policy
(2012) Platforms, systems competition, and innovation: reassessing the foundations of communications policy
Telecommunications Policy
(2014)To use or not to use: understanding the factors affecting continuance intention of mobile banking
International Journal of Mobile Communications
(2012)Divergent patterns of engagement in Internet standardization: Japan, Korea and China
Telecommunications Policy
(2014)- et al.
Past, present and future of mobile payments research: A literature review
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
(2008) - et al.
Mapping China׳s 3G market with the strategic network paradigm
Telecommunications Policy
(2012) - et al.
A new mobile payment scheme for roaming services
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
(2007) - et al.
Comparison of Chinese and Korean companies in ICT global standardization: Essential patent analysis
Telecommunications Policy
(2014) - et al.
The political economy of standards setting by newcomers: China׳s WAPI and South Korea׳s WIPI
Telecommunications Policy
(2008) - et al.
Forecasting 3G mobile subscription in China: A study based on stochastic frontier analysis and a Bass diffusion model
Telecommunications Policy
(2012)
Dynamics between the trust transfer progress and intention to use mobile payment services: A cross-environment perspective
Information Management
Mobile banking in a developing economy: A customer-centric model for policy formulation
Telecommunications Policy
(2006b)Towards a holistic analysis of mobile payments: A multiple perspectives approach
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Competition and regulation in China׳s 3G/4G mobile communications industry—Institutions, governance, and telecom SOEs
Telecommunications Policy
Mobile payment services adoption across time: An empirical study of the effects of behavioral beliefs, social influences, and personal traits
Computers in Human Behavior
Business ecosystem strategies of mobile network operators in the 3G era: The case of China Mobile
Telecommunications policy
Mobile payment models and their implications for NextGen MSPs
INFO
Complex landscapes: Mobile payments in Japan, South Korea, and the United States
Payments System Research Briefing
Economic and business perspectives on smartphones as multi-sided platforms
Telecommunications Policy
Whether NFC mobile payment can grasp the user pain point becomes key problem
Cards World
Mobile payments in Asia Pacific
Mobile payment applications: Offer state of the Artelor in the Italian market
Info
Role of innovation attributes in explaining the adoption intention for the interbank mobile payment service in an Indian context
Grand Successes and Failures in IT. Public and Private Sectors
Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities
Journal of Political Economy
Entry, standards and competition: Firm strategies and the diffusion of mobile telephony
Review of Industrial Organization
Cited by (55)
Understanding the continuous usage of mobile payment integrated into social media platform: The case of WeChat Pay
2023, Electronic Commerce Research and ApplicationsLeveraging digital technology for development: Does ICT contribute to poverty reduction?
2023, Telecommunications PolicyRethinking cross-border mobile payment ecosystems: A process study of mobile payment platform complementors, network effect holes and ecosystem modules
2023, International Business ReviewCitation Excerpt :Throughout this paper, the term “mobile payment” refers to “a transfer of funds in return for a good or service, where the mobile phone is involved in both the initiation and the confirmation of the payment” (De Bel & Gâza, 2011). In the international marketplace, “cross-border mobile payment” refers to a mobile payment initiated by an international buyer or seller to a domestic mobile payment platform (Miao & Jayakar, 2016). The issuing bank of the cross-border mobile payment platform converts the international transaction to a domestic transaction, which is subsequently settled at the settlement gateways by the corresponding banks (Miao et al., 2019).
Mobile, traditional, and cryptocurrency payments influence consumer trust, attitude, and destination choice: Chinese versus Koreans
2023, International Journal of Hospitality ManagementRelative convenience, relative advantage, perceived security, perceived privacy, and continuous use intention of China's WeChat Pay: A mixed-method two-phase design study
2021, Journal of Retailing and Consumer ServicesCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, the progress in the field of information technology and the deployment of smart devices have limited significantly the face-to-face interaction between customers and employees (Lee and Lee, 2019) and also have reshaped the way businesses and consumers interact. Due to the high penetration of smart devices such as smartphones, the deployment of mobile wallets has become the mainstream of payment methods in societies like China, Japan, and South Korea (Miao and Jayakar, 2016). A recent report shows that China remains the world’s leader with its 81% of mobile payment adoption followed by Norway (49%), India (37%), South Korea (36.7%), and Sweden (36.2%) (see the report by Merchant Savvy, 2020).
Consumer preferences of attributes of mobile payment services in South Korea
2020, Telematics and Informatics