Elsevier

Tourism Management

Volume 54, June 2016, Pages 178-184
Tourism Management

Students' summer tourism: Determinants of length of stay (LOS)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.11.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This is the first study of its kind on students' length of stay (LOS) at vacation destinations.

  • Daily expenditures, booking time, tourism/trip motives, trip month and gender explain much variation in LOS.

  • Trips with the return date already set before the trip takes place are of shorter duration.

Abstract

Studies scrutinizing the economic aspects of student tourism at the micro-level are rare in the literature. Set against this background, the present study examines the variation in a sample of Norwegian students' length of stay at summer vacation destinations in 2014. Three estimation methods – an OLS regression model, a Weibull survival model and a zero-truncated negative binomial regression model – provide qualitatively similar results regarding how a number of determinants affect length of stay. In particular, the results show that daily trip costs, booking time, tourism and trip motives, trip month and gender explain much of the variation in length of stay. Of special interest is the comparison of two segments differing on when trip duration is determined: the “pre-fixed” returners (75% of the sample) and the “open” returners (25%). In this regard, the results suggest that the “open” returners stay longer on their trips than the “pre-fixed” ones. Finally, the study provides some implications for future length of stay research.

Introduction

Academics have noted the important historical relationship between engaging in tourism and being a student (e.g. Thrane, 2008, Varasteh et al., 2014). Yet despite this close connection, empirical studies of the student tourism market did not take off until the 1990s according to Field (1999), with Hobson and Josiam's study (1992) one of the first. With recognition of the growing importance of student travel to the tourist economy (see Thrane, 2015a), a number of papers have been published examining the tourism behavior of students (for a review, see Varasteh et al., 2014).1 While this literature scrutinizes many issues, little attention has been devoted to the micro-level economic aspects of student tourism. In fact, the recent study by Thrane (2015a) was the first to examine the variation in students' tourism expenditures, highlighting the need for more research on economic topics. The present study is thus about the factors determining students' length of stay (LOS) or trip duration. Since participation in tourism in practically all cases entails costs, the LOS decision is at the end of the day made on economic grounds although other reasons might come into play as well. Against this backdrop, the present study takes a closer look at what extends or shortens students' LOS at summer vacation destinations. From the perspective of destination marketing organizations (DMOs), knowledge in this regard is ultimately crucial information for market segmentation purposes (Yang & Zhang, 2015). The novel focus of the study evolves around the question of whether students deciding on the return date before the trip actually takes place differ in LOS from those who come to a decision at some point along the way. The study also addresses how a number of other well-known determinants affect the variation in students' LOS.

The empirical context for the study is the students attending a Norwegian university college and their vacation trips during the summer 2014. The next section (2) outlines some of the most relevant studies of specific market segments' LOS/trip duration. Section 3 presents the determinants (i.e. regressors) of LOS in extant research and summarizes the purpose of the study in detail. Section 4 describes the data, variables and econometric model specifications and Section 5 presents the results. Section 6 discusses the most important findings, offers some implications and concludes.

Section snippets

Students and LOS-modeling studies of specific market segments

There are two opposing forces behind student engagement in tourism practices (Carr, 2005). On the one hand, students tend to have more free time and fewer family obligations than older and full-time employed people do. In a comparative sense, thus, students have more opportunities to engage in tourism and to embark on trips of longer duration. On the other hand, since tourism generally requires a certain amount of discretionary income (and trips of longer duration are more costly), students

Regressors of LOS and purpose of study

An interesting aspect of tourists' LOS not previously considered in the literature is whether the decision on trip duration is made before the trip actually takes place. Common observations suggest that for many a tourist the date of return from the destination has usually been decided long in advance of the trip actually taking place. The package trip is an obvious case in point, but the return date of an individually organized trip might also be decided before the trip commences. In other

Survey and sample

The data stem from a survey carried out at a medium-sized Norwegian university college during November and December 2014. To ensure a high response rate and a sample sufficiently large for multivariate analysis, the standard intercept-around-campus approach was deemed inappropriate. Instead, course instructors for first and second-year students of the various study programs distributed and collected the questionnaires during their regular classes. The sample's representativeness hinges on

Results of OLS regression analysis

Since previous LOS-research uses a number of different estimation methods, there is no established criterion for what might pass as acceptable model fit/explanatory power. In this regard, previous OLS models have yielded R-square values ranging from .21 (Lee et al., 2014) to .48 (Thrane & Farstad, 2012). Against this background, the present R-square of .474 suggests a model with satisfactory explanatory power. Another fact supporting this is that the variable tourist nationality (not relevant

Discussion, implications and conclusions

There is a paucity of research on the economic aspects of students' tourism behavior at the micro level. The purpose of this study has therefore been to shed light on one important economic aspect of student tourism, namely the variation in length of stay (LOS) or trip durations at vacation destinations. The LOS/trip duration of two decision segments was of primary focus: tourists who decided on the return date or LOS before the trip took place (the “pre-fixed” returners) and those deciding at

Christer Thrane has a Ph.D. in Sociology and is Professor of Tourism Research at Lillehammer University College, Norway. He teaches mainly quantitative research methods/econometrics and his research interests include quantitative tourism research in its widest sense. He has published a number of articles on several topics, including expenditure modeling, length of stay modeling, destination choice modeling, price hedonic modeling, transportation choice modeling and earnings determination.

References (36)

  • A.B. Grigolon et al.

    The influence of low-fare airlines on vacation choices of students: results of a stated portfolio choice experiment

    Tourism Management

    (2012)
  • E. Martínez-Garcia et al.

    Length of stay for low-cost tourism

    Tourism Management

    (2008)
  • J.M. Raya-Vilchez et al.

    Nationality and low-cost trip duration: a microeconometric analysis

    Journal of Air Transport Management

    (2011)
  • C. Thrane

    Analyzing tourists length of stay at destinations with survival models: a constructive critique based on a case study

    Tourism Management

    (2012)
  • C. Thrane

    Students' summer tourism: an econometric analysis of trip costs and trip expenditures

    Tourism Management Perspectives

    (2015)
  • E. Wang et al.

    Factors contributing to tourists' length of stay in Dalian northeastern China – a survival analysis

    Tourism Management Perspectives

    (2012)
  • Y. Yang et al.

    Modeling Tourists‘ length of stay: does one model fit all?

    Tourism Analysis

    (2015)
  • C.P. Barros et al.

    Determinants of the length of stay in Latin American tourism destinations

    Tourism Analysis

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    Christer Thrane has a Ph.D. in Sociology and is Professor of Tourism Research at Lillehammer University College, Norway. He teaches mainly quantitative research methods/econometrics and his research interests include quantitative tourism research in its widest sense. He has published a number of articles on several topics, including expenditure modeling, length of stay modeling, destination choice modeling, price hedonic modeling, transportation choice modeling and earnings determination.

    View full text