Truck freight demand elasticity with respect to tolls in New York State

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.035Get rights and content

Abstract

Road pricing is an important travel demand management strategy and its effects on transportation system has been widely investigated. Toll elasticity has been derived in the existing literature to characterize its effect on travel demand all around the world. However, very few studies have comprehensively analyzed the effect of tolls on freight transportation, which plays an increasingly important role in social and economic activities. To enrich the understanding of freight travel demand, this study conducted a stated preference survey on freight carriers who routinely use toll facilities. A regression model about freight carriers’ stated reduction in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on toll roads is then developed. The elasticity value is derived and compared with values in existing literature. Based on the calibrated model, the VMT change in response to hypothetical toll price increases is simulated for New York State. The simulation results reveal important insights that will help policy makers design ideal freight demand management strategies.

Introduction

Road pricing has been perceived as an effective method to reshape travel patterns, and consequently improve road usage efficiency and reduce emissions. Understanding the effect of road pricing requires comprehensive investigation of travel behavior, which is believed to be influenced by travelers’ socio-economic conditions, vehicle types, and road conditions, among others. It is also noticed that, however, behaviors differ significantly between passenger transportation and freight transportation. Passenger vehicles’ travel pattern is typically determined by drivers and riders. As a result, travel demand can be attributed to drivers’ and riders’ occupation, income and family sizes. Freight trips, on the other hand, are not only influenced by truck drivers, but also agents in other stages of supply chain, including at least receivers and shippers (D. Zhang and X.C. Wang, 2016). Therefore, analyses of freight travel demand also need to consider the characteristics of these agents, who vary significantly in size, organizational structure, and industrial sector. Because of these differences, effects of road pricing on passenger and freight transportation need to be distinguished. However, most existing literature focused on either passenger transportation or the overall transportation without distinguishing passenger and freight trips. Investigations focusing exclusively on freight travel demand under the influence of road pricing are fairly limited. With the increasingly important role of freight transportation, insufficient understanding of road pricing may lead to improper travel demand management strategies. This research fills this void by analyzing road pricing elasticity of freight travel demand.

Existing literature found that freight travel demand is influenced by many factors including the price of transported commodities, fuel charges, and operation expenses (Zou et al., 2017, Ni et al., 2016). Elasticities with respect to these factors have been derived using different methods and data. However, the effect of road pricing has not been adequately studied. Most studies simply assessed the sensitivity of freight travel demand by comparing the observed traffic volume before and after the change in road pricing. For example, Bari et al. (2015) examined the change in truck traffic on SH 130 in Austin, Texas after the toll rates fell. These investigations using revealed preference methods may not be comprehensive due to the following reasons: (1) Revealed preference may not obtain sufficient variation to examine all factors of interest; and (2) Revealed preference methods cannot evaluate freight travel demand corresponding to road pricing that does not exist in practice (Kroes, 1988). An attractive alternative is the stated preference method that collects information about freight carriers’ potential behavior change. Freight travel demand elasticity with respect to road pricing can be then derived with econometric models. Literature using survey data to analyze freight travel demand mainly comes from a series of the time-of-day pricing studies (Holguin-Veras et al., 2006, Soro and Wang, 2012, Holguín-Veras, 2008, Holguín-Veras, 2010) where the objective is to move truck traffic to off-peak hours. Another key branch of literature investigates road pricing from the perspective of truckers’ route choice. For example, Arentze et al. (2012) used experiments to examine the sensitivity of truckers’ behavior in response to pricing policies in a route choice context. However, the main focus was not to obtain travel demand elasticity. Given the lack of comprehensive examination of freight demand elasticity with respect to road pricing, this research conducts a stated preference survey in New York State to investigate this issue. Based on the results of the model, a simulation is then conducted to demonstrate the change in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) on the surveyed toll road in response to toll-price increases.

The stated preference survey of this study collects rich information about freight carriers’ behavior. The respondents are the managers of logistic companies that frequently use toll roads in New York State. The survey first collects the characteristics of these companies, such as size, types of commodities delivered, and origin/destination of each company’s typical deliveries. Each respondent is then given three hypothetical toll-increase scenarios and asked to indicate their tendency to reduce VMT on the toll road. As each respondent faces with multiple scenarios which lead to a repeated choice problem, an ordered probit model with repeated choices is estimated to obtain marginal effects of influential factors.

The paper is organized as follows: the next section reviews existing literature. Data description and methodology are then introduced. Results analysis and a simulation study are discussed, followed by conclusions.

Section snippets

Road pricing elasticity

Travel demand is affected by demographics, economic activities, travel modes, land use, and travel costs (Zhang and Wang, 2014, Zhang and Wang, 2015, D. Zhang and X. Wang, 2016). The travel costs include monetary costs for fuel, insurances, vehicles, tolls, etc. Among them, toll, or road pricing, can be set by transportation agencies to influence travel demand on roads, and is therefore considered as an effective travel demand management strategy. The effect of road pricing can be characterized

Data description

In 2014, the authors designed a survey aiming to collect freight carriers’ behavioral changes in response to hypothetical toll increases in New York State. The sampling frame for where the data were collected was the Motor Carrier Management Information System (MCMIS), which is maintained by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). In the first stage, 9000 carriers who used the toll roads in New York State frequently were selected as the sample population. To balance the

Model specification

Let i(i=1N) denote the respondents in the survey and t(t=1T) denote the tth repeated choice. The level of VMT reduction can be expressed asyit=βixit+εityit=mitifψmit-1yit<ψmitwhere yit is the latent utility of VMT reduction and ψ is a set of thresholds that divide the continuous utility into the ordered level mit. The term xit contains the influential variables, such as the hypothetical toll-increase amount, locational characteristics, and types of commodity transported. The error term ε

Results analysis

The data of VMT reduction is analyzed using the ordered probit model with repeated choices. The model starts with including all potentially influential variables and then variables of statistical insignificance are removed. A standard ordered probit model is also estimated and the estimation result is similar as the result of the ordered probit model with repeated choices. Comparing the log-likelihood values of the two models, the ordered probit model with repeated choices is larger, leading to

VMT simulation

Based on the estimation of the random coefficient ordered probit model, a simulation can be conducted to demonstrate the change in freight travel demand in response to toll increases. The current VMT is shown in the third column of Table 7 and sub-grouped by vehicle sizes and payment methods. The current VMT is calculated by the number of trucks using certain pairs of thruway exits provided by New York Thruway Authority.

The values of variables of the hypothetical toll-increase amount, vehicle

Conclusions

This study calculates the road pricing elasticity of the freight travel demand, which has not been comprehensively investigated in the existing literature. The elasticity estimation value is −0.37, which is in the mid-range of the elasticity reported in the existing freight travel demand studies.

By conducting a survey of freight behavior, this study identifies a series of factors influencing freight demand. A behavioral-consistent regression model, the ordered probit model with repeated

Acknowledgement

The research reported in this paper was supported by the University Transportation Research Center Region II as part of the Project “Assessing Behavior Changes under the Influence of Travel Demand Management Strategies.”

References (44)

  • D. Zhang et al.

    Transit ridership estimation with network Kriging: a case study of Second Avenue Subway, NYC

    J. Transp. Geogr.

    (2014)
  • W. Zou et al.

    Truck crash severity in New York city: an investigation of the spatial and the time of day effects

    Acc. Anal. Prevent.

    (2017)
  • T. Arentze et al.

    Context-dependent influence of road attributes and pricing policies on route choice behavior of truck drivers: results of a conjoint choice experiment

    Transportation

    (2012)
  • M.E. Bari et al.

    The impact of a toll reduction for truck traffic using SH 130

    Case Stud. Transport Policy

    (2015)
  • Burris, M.W., 2001. Analysis of driver response to variable tolls (No. 30-09489...
  • M.W. Burris

    The toll-price component of travel demand elasticity

    Int. J. Transport Econ./Rivista internazionale di economia dei trasporti

    (2003)
  • V. Casanovas Oliva et al.

    Explaining farm succession: the impact of farm location and off-farm employment opportunities

    Spanish J. Agric. Res.

    (2007)
  • Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 2013. Motor Carrier Management Information...
  • A.F. Friedlaender et al.

    A derived demand function for freight transportation

    Rev. Econ. Stat.

    (1980)
  • J. Gifford et al.

    Demand elasticity under time-varying prices: case study of day-of-week varying tolls on Golden Gate Bridge

    Transport. Res. Rec.: J. Transport. Res. Board

    (1996)
  • D.J. Graham et al.

    Road traffic demand elasticity estimates: a review

    Transport Rev.

    (2004)
  • I. Hirschman et al.

    Bridge and tunnel toll elasticities in New York

    Transportation

    (1995)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Understanding mobility inequality through the lens of economic welfare: The difference in willingness-to-pay and actual fare matters

      2023, Cities
      Citation Excerpt :

      As a result, the empirical dataset usually has a panel setting, enabling a few model specification alternatives in addition to the linear model. First, random-coefficient models can be adopted to capture the variation of coefficients among different respondents, capturing individual heterogeneity (Wang & Zhang, 2017). Second, random-effect models can be estimated to allow the differentiation of individual-specific variation from the total variation.

    • Perceived barriers to the movement of goods in Canada: A grounded theory investigation

      2022, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Freight transportation is essential to the economic prosperity of metropolitan regions (Anderson et al., 2005; Kiba-Janiak, 2017). Prominent areas of focus in the freight congestion literature include: infrastructure management and design (Wood and Regehr, 2017), parking and curbside management (Marcucci et al., 2015; Nourinejad and Roorda, 2017), public and active transit (Behiri et al., 2018; Ozturk & Patrick, 2018), freight supportive ITS applications (Flamini et al., 2018; Pulugurtha & Jain, 2018), first- and last-mile connectivity (Fancello et al., 2017; Pronello et al., 2017; Wygonik and Goodchild, 2018), city/urban logistics (Marcucci & Gatta, 2017; Oliveira and Oliveira, 2016; Pinto et al., 2019), supply-chain analysis and fluidity (Calatayud et al., 2017; Eisele et al., 2016), operations management (Onstein et al., 2019), freight and consumer demand (He et al., 2019; McLeod et al., 2019; Oliveira et al., 2017), land use management and taxation (Aljohani & Thompson, 2016; Gingerich & Maoh, 2019), demand management (Chen et al., 2018; Holguín-Veras, 2011; Wang & Zhang, 2017), multi-modalism (Crainic et al., 2018), autonomous vehicles (Boysen et al., 2018; Cohen & Cavoli, 2019; Kusumakar et al., 2018), and stakeholder engagement (Gatta et al., 2019). Despite this wealth of research, there is still a limited understanding of the complex interactions across supply-chains (McLeod et al., 2019; Sakai et al., 2019).

    • Identifying intracity freight trip ends from heavy truck GPS trajectories

      2022, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, heavy trucks contribute 36% of air pollution in Sao Paulo (Perez-Martinez et al., 2017) and 18% of traffic death accidents in Europe (Evgenikos et al., 2016). In recent years, authorities and organizations have developed many freight-related policies, such as truck road pricing (Wang and Zhang, 2017), freight bottleneck management (Sharma et al., 2020) and freight demand management (Hassan et al., 2020), to eliminate the negative effects of heavy trucks. Intracity heavy truck freight trips are critical basic data for developing these freight policies.

    • Political and technical complexities of electronic toll collection: Lessons from Taiwan

      2022, Case Studies on Transport Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, governments and transportation agencies are faced with many complexities regarding ETC related to practical application, technological development, political variations and to publicity and marketing of the schemes. Most studies into ETC are quantitative in nature (Abdel-Aty, 2003; Jou et al., 2011, 2013; Kramberger and Curin, 2011; Wang and Zhang, 2017). Nevertheless, qualitative studies are also undertaken (Ogden, 2001; Lee et al., 2008; Dias et al., 2014).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text