Carbon footprint from road transport use in Kolkata city
Introduction
The term carbon footprint is a relatively new concept, and can be generally described as the total greenhouse gas emissions associated with any anthropogenic activity. However, in many cases, for simplicity, we consider only carbon-di-oxide emissions, while measuring carbon footprint. Driven by a widespread use in the academic literature, carbon footprint has now become a synonym for the climate change impact of individuals, communities, nations or any specific activity. Carbon footprint is intricately related with the consumption and lifestyle pattern of individuals. This is because the kind of food consumed by the people, the way cooking is done at homes, the transport that is being used, or the kind of appliance ownership at homes, all these activities generate significant energy consumption and emissions. It is not urbanisation per se, that contribute to GHG emissions, but rather the way in which people move around the city, the way in which people use energy at home, that make cities the great consumers of energy and polluters that they are. India is a developing country with huge growth potential. Energy consumption patterns widely vary across different cities and income groups in the country. There is a strong middle-class, growing at a faster pace than the overall population with high consumption aspirations. With changing income distribution pattern and changing socio-economic profile of people, lifestyle pattern of the metropolitan cities of developing countries are changing rapidly. Kolkata is one such city which according to a report by ICLEI South Asia, 2009 is the largest emitter of carbon di-oxide among 41 key main metropolitan cities across India, with total emissions of around 9.3 million tonnes (in absolute terms). The transportation sector is the major contributor towards the city emissions.
As India undergoes fast economic growth, energy consumption and GHG emissions in the transport sector would increase exponentially given the growth in population, changes in income distribution pattern, scale of urban expansion and continued quest of improving living standards. Over the period 1991–2005, energy consumption from urban transport in 23 major urban areas (million plus cities) in India became more than double, growing from 103 to 209 PJ, and carbon emissions increased from 7.9 to 15.3 Mt (Li Jun, 2011). The city of Kolkata in 2010 registered emissions to the tune of 1.8 million tons from road transport itself, with the maximum emissions coming from diesel operated vehicles (Guttikunda and Jawahar, 2012). According to a CSE report (2011), in Kolkata, the cars and two wheelers together already use up about 40 per cent of the total energy consumption of the city’s road transport.
Against this background, this paper attempts to estimate the carbon footprint arising from household’s use of road transport in the city of Kolkata across various income categories. The objective is to see how the footprint changes across income categories and also what factors drive changes in the footprint values across the defined income categories.
Section snippets
Literature review
In the past two decades, the role of consumers and their consumption patterns have attracted increasing attention and discussion among researchers. The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report for policymakers, Working Group III has mentioned in its report that Changes in lifestyles and consumption patterns that emphasize resource conservation can contribute to developing a low-carbon economy that is both equitable and sustainable. In the late 1980s, some researchers brought the
A brief review of Kolkata’s road transport situation
Kolkata is the capital of West Bengal state in the eastern part of India with a population of about 4.5 million (as per provisional reports of Census India, 2011) making it the third-most populous metropolitan area in India. Although the city has a population of 4.5 million; its urban/metropolitan population is over 14 million. Kolkata city, which is under the jurisdiction of the Kolkata Municipal Corporation (KMC), has an area of 185 km2. The KMC oversees and manages the civic infrastructure of the
Methodology
In this paper, there are three different methodological parts. The first part involves choosing a representative sample of households for conducting the primary survey. For this purpose, a questionnaire has been designed which captures the household lifestyle pattern
Sampling
500 households have been chosen across the city of Kolkata. Households have been selected based on the following methodology
- a.
There are a total of 141 administrative wards across Kolkata, managed by the KMC.
- b.
Based on their geographical locations, these 141 wards have been divided into four blocks-North, South, East and West. On the basis of this specification, North Kolkata has 40 wards, East and West Kolkata have 31 wards each and South Kolkata comprising of 39 wards.
- c.
For each ward, data for total
Survey findings
On the basis of the survey methodology, the selected 40 wards are shown in Fig. 3. Survey results shows that the average household size in KMC area is 3.8 and about 73 per cent of households have three to five family members. However, household size in some locations is as big as 6–10 members. The average household income per month in the study area is about Rs. 30,000 ($500)2. On the other hand the average per capita income for the study area is around Rs. 8552 ($142.5).
Summary and conclusion
It is now widely observed that lifestyle pattern of the metropolitan cities of developing countries are changing rapidly. With changing income distribution pattern and changing socio-economic profile of people, lifestyle pattern of the metropolitan cities of developing countries are gradually converging the developed country counterparts. While countries are undergoing fast economic growth and profound societal transformation, energy consumption and GHG emissions in the transport sector is
Acknowledgement
I am thankful to University Grants Commission (UGC), India for giving me the grant of Post Doctoral Fellowship, without the financial help of which, I would have been unable to conduct the surveys in Kolkata city. I am thankful to my friends Manisha Chakraborty of Indian Institute of Management, Kolkata and Saubhik Deb of World Bank to provide me help with the econometric part of the study.
References (18)
- et al.
Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions
Energy Policy
(2005) Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input–output analysis
Energy Policy
(1998)- et al.
A comparative multivariate analysis of household requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan
Energy
(2006) - et al.
Direct and indirect energy requirements of households in India
Energy Policy
(2002) - et al.
Energy use in Indian household sector: an actor oriented approach
Energy
(2009) - et al.
The direct and indirect energy requirement of households in the European Union
Energy Policy
(2003) - et al.
Modeling lifestyle effects on energy demand and related emissions
Energy Policy
(2000) - et al.
The impact of lifestyle on energy use and CO2 emission: An empirical analysis of China's residents
Energy Policy
(2007) - et al.
The impact of household consumption on energy use and CO2 emissions in China
Energy
(2011)
Cited by (12)
Virtual carbon emissions in the big cities of middle-income countries
2021, Urban ClimateCitation Excerpt :Indeed, the urban development in the MICs is based primarily on urban sprawl leading to an increase in daily trips and expand traveled distance alongside the cheap fuel-price which promote movements. These factors led to a sharp rise in energy consumption in the transportation system and eventually direct CO2 emissions, as it has mentioned before by (Gupta, 2014) “it is not the urbanization which causes urban carbon emissions but rather the way in which people move within cities”. MICs' cities suffer also from housing-related carbon emissions which are primarily linked to fossil energy consumption in households, notice that even the electricity used in households (for cooking, heating/cooling spaces, and water) is produced by fossil fuels (oil and natural gas).
Patterns and drivers of household carbon footprint of the herdsmen in the typical steppe region of inner Mongolia, China: A case study in Xilinhot City
2019, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :The carbon footprint has been widely adopted for carbon taxing, carbon trading, and computing carbon allocations (Minx et al., 2013; Rahman et al., 2011; Tahmasebi et al., 2018). Many carbon footprint studies have been conducted at national (Hertwich and Peters, 2009; Markaki et al., 2017), regional (Minx et al., 2013; Sovacool and Brown, 2010), or industrial scales (Das Gupta, 2014; Veeramani et al., 2017). The household, as the basic unit of production and consumption, directly influences GHG emissions through the inhabitant's lifestyle and consumption pattern.
Calculation of Carbon Footprints for Water Diversion and Desalination Projects
2015, Energy ProcediaA Bibliometric Review of Household Carbon Footprint during 2000–2022
2023, Sustainability (Switzerland)Estimating Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Freeway Traffic: A Spatiotemporal Cell-Based Model
2020, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems