Review
Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.011Get rights and content

Agricultural expansion and intensification have altered the quantity and quality of global water flows. Research suggests that these changes have increased the risk of catastrophic ecosystem regime shifts. We identify and review evidence for agriculture-related regime shifts in three parts of the hydrological cycle: interactions between agriculture and aquatic systems, agriculture and soil, and agriculture and the atmosphere. We describe the processes that shape these regime shifts and the scales at which they operate. As global demands for agriculture and water continue to grow, it is increasingly urgent for ecologists to develop new ways of anticipating, analyzing and managing nonlinear changes across scales in human-dominated landscapes.

Section snippets

Humans have modified the water cycle through agriculture

Human transformation of global water flows has dramatically impacted ecosystems and the services they generate. Through water withdrawals, land use and land cover changes, agriculture, which covers almost 40% of the terrestrial surface [1], is arguably the major way in which humans change water quantity and quality (Box 1). Water for irrigation accounts for 66% of societal water withdrawals, reducing water availability for downstream ecosystems [2]. Irrigation and deforestation for agriculture

Three parts of the hydrological cycle where agriculture can trigger regime shifts

The hydrological cycle can be seen as the ‘bloodstream of the biosphere’ [18], because runoff, groundwater and evapotranspiration move materials among different ecosystems and alter energy balances in landscapes. This paper examines how agricultural changes across the whole hydrological cycle can produce regime shifts. We classify agriculture–water regime shifts into three categories depending on where they occur in relation to the hydrological cycle (Figure 1). These categories are:

  • (i)

    agriculture

There is large variation in the spatial scales and reversibility of regime shifts

The regime shifts we have identified as related to agricultural changes to water flows (Table 1) operate at a wide range of spatial scales and are reversible at different temporal scales (Figure 2). Agriculture–aquatic system regime shifts occur at the watershed to river basin scales but vary from years to millennia in their reversibility. For example, freshwater eutrophication is often irreversible, or only reversible after massive reductions of phosphorus inputs for decades or longer, owing

Agriculture interacts with other drives to produce water-related regime shifts

Regime shifts are triggered by the interaction of changes internally in a system and changes in external drivers (Box 2). In Table 1, we identify critical internal ‘slow variables’ that strongly influence the vulnerability of an ecosystem to regime shifts. Managing these slow variables to maintain resilience can thus be an important management strategy. We also identify the external drivers that can produce regime shifts, separating these into agricultural and nonagricultural drivers. In many

Enhancing resilience of agricultural landscapes

Hydrological alterations due to growing agricultural demands (Box 1) are likely to increase the risk of surprising regime shifts unless management practices are changed. The expected alterations can be reduced by improving the productivity of water in agriculture (Box 1), but enhancing resilience to the regime shifts discussed here requires active management of ecosystem processes across agricultural landscapes. Avoiding the discussed regime shifts is thus not only a question of improving

Conclusions and research challenges

There is strong evidence that agricultural modification of water flows can produce a variety of ecological regime shifts that operate across a range of spatial and temporal scales. In a world of growing demands for water, agricultural products and other ecosystem services, there will inevitably be ecological surprises. Preparing for these surprises is essential to maintain ecosystem services of importance for human well-being. Preparation requires understanding the forces that drive these

Acknowledgements

L.J.G.'s research was funded by the Swedish Research Council for the Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (Formas), and G.D.P.'s work was funded by the Canada Research Chairs Program. We would also like to thank Elin Enfors, Frédéric Guichard, Navin Ramankutty and Maria Tengö for comments on the manuscript, and Tove Gordon and Robert Kautsky for help with figures.

References (69)

  • Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture

    Water for Food, Water for Life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture

    (2007)
  • S.R. Carpenter

    Millennium ecosystem assessment: research needs

    Science

    (2006)
  • G.D. Peterson

    Uncertainty and the management of multistate ecosystems: an apparently rational route to collapse

    Ecology

    (2003)
  • C. Folke

    Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management

    Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.

    (2004)
  • D.P.C. Peters

    Cross-scale interactions, nonlinearities, and forecasting catastrophic events

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2004)
  • J.A. Rial

    Nonlinearities, feedbacks and critical thresholds within the Earth's climate system

    Clim. Change

    (2004)
  • M. Rietkerk

    Self-organized patchiness and catastrophic shifts in ecosystems

    Science

    (2004)
  • M. Scheffer

    Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems

    Nature

    (2001)
  • B. Walker et al.

    Thresholds in ecological and social-ecological systems: a developing database

    Ecol. Soc.

    (2004)
  • M. Scheffer

    Synergy between small- and large-scale feedbacks of vegetation on the water cycle

    Glob. Change Biol.

    (2005)
  • W. Ripl

    Water: the bloodstream of the biosphere

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.

    (2003)
  • S.R. Carpenter

    Regime Shifts in Lake Ecosystems: Pattern and Variation

    (2003)
  • S.R. Carpenter

    Eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems: bistability and soil phosphorus

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2005)
  • R.J. Diaz

    Overview of hypoxia around the world

    J. Environ. Qual.

    (2001)
  • S.D. Donner et al.

    How climate controls the flux of nitrogen by the Mississippi River and the development of hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico

    Limnol. Oceanogr.

    (2007)
  • M. Scheffer et al.

    Shallow lakes theory revisited: various alternative regimes driven by climate, nutrients, depth and lake size

    Hydrobiologia

    (2007)
  • J. Hooke

    River meander behaviour and instability: a framework for analysis

    Trans. Inst. Brit. Geograph.

    (2003)
  • C.L. Dent

    Multiple states in river and lake ecosystems

    Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.

    (2002)
  • D.P.C. Peters

    Disentangling complex landscapes: new insights into arid and semiarid system dynamics

    Bioscience

    (2006)
  • J.A. Ludwig

    Vegetation patches and runoff-erosion as interacting ecohydrological processes in semiarid landscapes

    Ecology

    (2005)
  • S. Kefi

    Spatial vegetation patterns and imminent desertification in Mediterranean arid ecosystems

    Nature

    (2007)
  • M. Sankaran

    Determinants of woody cover in African savannas

    Nature

    (2005)
  • V.A. Cramer et al.

    Assessing the ecological risk from secondary salinity: a framework addressing questions of scale and threshold responses

    Austral. Ecol.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (287)

    • Riverine landscapes and resilience

      2023, Resilience and Riverine Landscapes
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text