A constitutive model for load-displacement performance of modified cable bolts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.05.025Get rights and content

Abstract

Cable bolts are extensively used in mining and civil structures as one of the most important support systems for ground control. In order to design an effective support system, understanding the performance of cable bolts under the conditions other than those tested in the laboratory is essential. Thus, this paper outlines the development of a constitutive model that can predict the full load-displacement performance of the modified cable bolts at different confining pressures. The model includes the nonlinear dilation equation and the peak axial load envelope as the governing laws. The governing equations for the failure mechanisms at the cable to grout interface and grout annulus are coupled using advanced partial differential equations. The full load-displacement behaviour of modified cable bolts with a smooth transition from initial elastic behaviour to progressive failure is simulated using continuous yielding method. The model is then calibrated against the experimental data reported in the literature. It has been demonstrated that there is a good agreement between the model simulations and the experimental results confirming the suitability of the proposed constitutive model for performance prediction of the modified cable bolts at different confining pressures.

Introduction

Fully grouted cable bolts are extensively used as one of the most reliable support systems in surface and underground rock structures (Li et al., 2017). Their performance includes the transition of the load from the unstable rock zone to relatively stable rocks far from the excavation (Ghadimi et al., 2015). Despite the substantial improvement in the design and performance of cable bolts over the past few decades, there is still some likelihood of ground failure within the reinforced area using cable bolts. It has been reported that cable bolt failure generally occurs at the bolt to grout interface if strand rupture has not occurred (Goris, 1991, Hutchinson and Diederichs, 1996, Hyett et al., 1992a, Hyett et al., 1992b, Yazici and Kaiser, 1992). Therefore, to better understand such a problem, the focus on the mechanical performance of the strand steel to grout interface is important.

To date, two types of cable bolts have been used in the mining industry including conventional and modified cable bolts. The former is made of several plain steel strands such as plain strand cable bolt while the latter consists of bulbed, nutcase and birdcaged cable bolts that exhibit some form of deformed structure. Extensive experimental investigations have focused on the performance of conventional cable bolts under axial loading over the past few decades (Benmokrane et al., 1995, Blanco Martín et al., 2013, Farah and Aref, 1986, Goris et al., 1993, Hassani and Rajaie, 1990, Hyett et al., 1995, Macsporran, 1993, Reichert et al., 1991, Stillborg, 1984) though there have been very limited studies assessing its behaviour from an analytical viewpoint (Blanco Martin, 2012, Chen et al., 2015, Hyett et al., 1995).

Yazici and Kaiser (1992) introduced a bond strength model (BSM) using thick wall cylinder theory to determine the load carrying capacity. The modified cable bolts were developed to improve the load carrying capacity under axial loading condition. Hyett et al., 1994, Moosavi et al., 1996, Moosavi et al., 2002 assessed the performance of the modified cable bolts (nutcase and Garford bulbed) under both constant confining pressure and constant radial stiffness conditions. Thomas (2012) evaluated the performance of bulbed and nutcaged cable bolts under constant radial stiffness. Moosavi (1997) developed an analytical model for load-displacement behaviour of modified cable bolts based on linear dilation assumption.

It has been well accepted that the failure mechanism of conventional and modified cable bolts can differ during a pull-out test. Hyett et al. (1995) stated three types of failure mechanisms for bond failure of conventional cable bolts including dilation slip, unscrewing and shear failure of the cement flutes. The dilation slip failure mechanism is applicable to modified cable bolt and dominates the bond failure. Hyett et al. (1995) reported that the unscrewing and shear failure of the cement flutes have negligible effects on the failure mechanism of modified cable bolts.

Several parameters are important in the performance of modified cable bolts under axial loading including elastic properties of the grout, the design and fabrication of the cable bolt and the boundary conditions that is applied to outside the grout annulus. Thus, this study was undertaken with the aim to combine these parameters in a meaningful way resulting in the development of a constitutive model for prediction of the load-displacement performance of the modified cable bolts at different confining pressures. The important feature of this model is the inclusion of nonlinear dilation for the grout at the cable bolt to grout interface during the pull-out test. This is the significant distinction between this study and that conducted by Moosavi (1997).

Section snippets

Notation

The constitutive model is formulated using two sets of governing matrices having two different boundaries; cable bolt to grout interface and grout annulus. For simplicity, the subscript 1 indicates the cable bolt to grout interface (r1,ur1 and p1) and subscript 2 represents the grout annulus (r2,ur2 and p2). r1 and r2 are the radii of the cable bolt and borehole, respectively while ur1 and ur2 are the dilations of the grout at the cable bolt to grout interface and grout external boundary,

Model components

The model presented here describes the performance of modified cable bolt under axial loading and constant confining pressure. The novel feature of this model is the utilisation of the fundamental principles related to rock discontinuity characterisation to predict the performance of cable bolt to grout interface as opposed to earlier studies that considered the stress distribution along a discrete element of bolt based on force equilibrium law (Cai et al., 2004, Chen et al., 2015, Li and

Model calibration

The proposed model is calibrated against experimental data to confirm its validity. Initially, the data reported by Moosavi (1997) on nutcase and Garfold bulbed cable bolts is used for model calibration. Later, results from Australian Megabolt provided by Kent and Bigby (2001) as well as those reported by Clifford et al. (2001) on birdcaged cable bolt are utilized.

Conclusions

A constitutive model was developed for the prediction of load-displacement performance of modified cable bolts at various confining pressures. The model adopted the modified nonlinear dilation equation as the governing law resulting in a good prediction of the performance of modified cable bolts. Given there are different contributing components in the pull-out test of modified cable bolt (steel tubes, cementitious grout and cable bolt), the transfer of the axial and radial stiffness as well as

References (36)

  • Y. Li et al.

    A constitutive model for a laboratory rock joint with multi-scale asperity degradation

    Comput. Geotech.

    (2016)
  • S. Ma et al.

    An analytical model of fully grouted rock bolts subjected to tensile load

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2013)
  • J. Oh et al.

    A joint shear model incorporating small-scale and large-scale irregularities

    Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci.

    (2015)
  • S. Yazici et al.

    Bond strength of grouted cable bolts

    Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci.

    (1992)
  • Barton, N., 1982. Modelling rock joint behavior from in situ block tests: implications for nuclear waste repository...
  • N. Barton et al.

    The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice

    Rock Mech.

    (1977)
  • Blanco Martin, L., 2012. Theoretical and experimental study of fully grouted rockbolts and cablebolts under axial...
  • J. Chen et al.

    Load transfer behavior of fully grouted cable bolts reinforced in weak rocks under tensile loading conditions

    Geotech. Test. J.

    (2016)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text