Review
Simulation of the spatial distribution of the acoustic pressure in sonochemical reactors with numerical methods: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.11.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Last 15 years on the simulation of the acoustic field inside sonoreactors by numerical methods are briefly summarised.

  • Pros and cons of the different models reviewed in the manuscript are explained.

  • Recent works on novel topics (vibration of the reactor walls, nonlinear phenomena) are illustrated.

  • Challenges that must be addressed in the next years are also briefly discussed.

Abstract

Numerical methods for the calculation of the acoustic field inside sonoreactors have rapidly emerged in the last 15 years. This paper summarizes some of the most important works on this topic presented in the past, along with the diverse numerical works that have been published since then, reviewing the state of the art from a qualitative point of view. In this sense, we illustrate and discuss some of the models recently developed by the scientific community to deal with some of the complex events that take place in a sonochemical reactor such as the vibration of the reactor walls and the nonlinear phenomena inherent to the presence of ultrasonic cavitation. In addition, we point out some of the upcoming challenges that must be addressed in order to develop a reliable tool for the proper designing of efficient sonoreactors and the scale-up of sonochemical processes.

Introduction

Sonochemistry [1] is the area of high-energy chemistry which studies chemical reactions and processes involving acoustic cavitation formed by the application of an ultrasonic field in a frequency range which commonly varies between 20 kHz and 10 MHz. It allows chemists to increase the conversion, improve the yield, initiate and change the reaction pathways in all sorts of biological, chemical or electrochemical processes [2], becoming a prominently used technique in a wide variety of research areas, including: (i) material science [3] (ii) synthetic chemistry [4], [5], (iii) water remediation [6], [7], (iv) biotechnological applications [8], (v) electrochemical processes [9], (vi) food technology [10], and (vii) spent nuclear fuel reprocessing [11], among others. The versatility of the use of ultrasound in chemistry permits its combination with other technologies such as photocatalysis [12] or microwaves [13], proving the enormous potential of Sonochemistry.

Despite this extensive research at laboratory scale, a limited number of applications have been industrially scaled-up due to two main reasons: (i) the lack of expertise in diverse areas such as ultrasonics or sonochemical engineering, and (ii) the lack of proper reactor designing strategies. Related to this, Sutkar and Gogate have stated that understanding the cavitational activity and its distribution would yield efficiently designed sonochemical reactors and systems [14], and for this purpose, theoretical analysis of the cavitational activity distribution with proper experimental validation could be used for the optimization of sonochemical processes taking into account building materials, geometry of the reactor and working frequency of the sonochemical system. A correct understanding of the acoustic field structure inside a sonochemical reactor is therefore needed to proceed with its optimization and scale-up in order to design efficient large scale reactors [15].

The numerical simulation of the spatial distribution of the acoustic pressure inside sonochemical reactors has widely emerged in the last 15 years to shed new light on this issue, and quite a few groups around the world have tried to model the acoustic field inside sonoreactors with the aim of predicting the cavitation events within the reactor. To our knowledge, the most recent review on this topic found in the literature was published more than 10 years ago [16], and no exhaustive literature revisions are usually found in most of the papers that deal with the simulation of the acoustic field in a sonoreactor. Therefore, the goal of the present paper is to introduce numerical methods for the development of sonochemical reactors to a wider audience of scientists by summarizing the continuous development of numerical methods employed by the scientific community from the late 1990s until now. In this paper, basic methodologies and results from many works are briefly commented, pointing out the strong and weak points in the most representative cases from a qualitative point of view. And new trends and future challenges on the problem are also discussed.

Section snippets

Basic linear-based models

The vast majority of the works dealing with the simulation of the acoustic field inside a sonochemical reactor rely on the resolution of the equations that describe the linear propagation of sound in a liquid. Such equations, which are derived from the linearization of the Euler equations [17], yield the well-known Helmholtz equation for the linear propagation of sound waves:2P+k2P=0being P the acoustic pressure and k=ω/cl the wave number, where ω is the angular frequency and cl is the sound

Numerical simulations of the acoustic field inside sonochemical reactors using nonlinear-based models

Even though the acoustic pressure attenuation or damping effect (and implicit energy dissipation) due to the presence of cavitating bubbles has been accounted for in some of the previously mentioned studies, the different methodologies followed in all those works were basically linear-based approaches to actually solve a strongly nonlinear acoustic field where nonlinearity specially comes from the formation, growth and collapse of the cavitating bubbles. Nevertheless, as argued by Harvey and

Simulation of the ultrasonic transducer

In the previous section, accounting for the vibration of the solid boundaries was briefly commented, concluding that the deformation of the reactor walls effectively affects the acoustic field and, therefore, it should not be neglected. In this sense, a question rapidly comes up: why not considering the vibration of the ultrasonic transducer too? Most of the works found in the literature usually treat the emitter boundary as a acoustic field source where a uniformly distributed acoustic

New challenges and trends in coming years

Even if the simulation of the whole electromechanical transducer can be accounted for in a relatively easy way, we have to keep in mind the complexity of rigorously modeling the electromechanic transducer, the vibrations of the reactor walls, and the acoustic field inside the reactor. Regarding the electromechanic transducer, pre-stress must be accounted for in order to avoid the estimation of resonant frequencies that may significantly differ from the real one. It must be also taken into

Acknowledgments

All the authors would like to express their deepest affection and gratitude to Dr. José González-García, who passed away on 25th February 2012, for impulsing the research on Sonochemistry and Sonoelectrochemistry at the University of Alicante. The authors would also like to acknowledge the significant contribution to the discussions included in this review made by the referees.

References (99)

  • B. Dubus et al.

    Numerical modeling of high-power ultrasonic systems: current status and future trends

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2000)
  • F. Ihlenburg et al.

    Finite element solution of the Helmholtz Equation with high wave number. Part I: The h-Version of the FEM

    Comput. Math. Appl.

    (1995)
  • I. Babûska et al.

    A Generalized Finite Element Method for solving the Helmholtz equation in two dimensions with minimal pollution

    Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.

    (1995)
  • J. Klíma et al.

    Optimisation of 20 kHz sonoreactor geometry on the basis of numerical simulation of local ultrasonic intensity and qualitative comparison with experimental results

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2007)
  • Z.-W. Shao et al.

    Numerical simulation of standing waves for ultrasonic purification of magnesium alloy melt

    Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China

    (2010)
  • Z.-W. Shao et al.

    Numerical simulation of acoustic pressure field for ultrasonic grain refinement of AZ80 magnesium alloy

    Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China

    (2011)
  • Z. Shao et al.

    Numerical simulation of standing waves for ultrasonic purification of magnesium alloy melt

    Mater. Des.

    (2011)
  • H.-J. Kim et al.

    Effect of ultrasound irradiation on solvent extraction process

    J. Ind. Eng. Chem.

    (2009)
  • A. Thiemann et al.

    Characterization of an acoustic cavitation bubble structure at 230 kHz

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2011)
  • V.S. Sutkar et al.

    Theoretical prediction of cavitational activity distribution in sonochemical reactors

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2010)
  • Z. Xu et al.

    Numerical simulation of liquid velocity distribution in a sonochemical reactor

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2013)
  • S. Perincek et al.

    Design parameter investigation of industrial size ultrasound textile treatment bath

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2009)
  • O. Dahlem et al.

    The radially vibrating horn: a scaling-up possibility for sonochemical reactions

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1999)
  • J.-L. Laborde et al.

    Acoustic cavitation field prediction at low and high frequency ultrasounds

    Ultrasonics

    (1998)
  • S. Dähnke et al.

    Modeling of linear pressure fields in sonochemical reactors considering an inhomogeneous density distribution of cavitation bubbles

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1999)
  • S. Dähnke et al.

    Modeling of three-dimensional pressure fields in sonochemical reactors with an inhomogeneous density distribution of cavitation bubbles. Comparison of theoretical and experimental results

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (1999)
  • S. Dähnke et al.

    A comparative study on the modeling of sound pressure field distributions in a sonoreactor with experimental investigation

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (1999)
  • S.R. Soudagar et al.

    Semiquantitative characterization of ultrasonic cleaner using a novel piezoelectric pressure intensity measurement probe

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (1995)
  • R. Jamshidi et al.

    Numerical investigation of sonochemical reactors considering the effect of inhomogeneous bubble clouds on ultrasonic wave propagation

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2012)
  • J. Jordens et al.

    Investigation of design parameters in ultrasound reactors with confined channels

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2013)
  • G. Servant et al.

    Numerical simulation of cavitation bubble dynamics induced by ultrasound waves in a high frequency reactor

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2000)
  • G. Servant et al.

    Spatio-temporal dynamics of cavitation bubble clouds in a low frequency reactor: comparison between theoretical and experimental results

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2001)
  • G. Servant et al.

    On the interaction between ultrasound waves and bubble clouds in mono- and dual-frequency sonoreactors

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2003)
  • N. Shimizu et al.

    Sonocatalytic degradation of methylene blue with TiO2 pellets in water

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2007)
  • K. Yasui et al.

    FEM calculation of an acoustic field in a sonochemical reactor

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2007)
  • O. Louisnard et al.

    FEM simulation of a sono-reactor accounting for vibrations of the boundaries

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2009)
  • I. Tudela et al.

    Study of the influence of transducer–electrode and electrode–wall gaps on the acoustic field inside a sonoelectrochemical reactor by FEM simulations

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2011)
  • O. Louisnard

    A simple model of propagation in a cavitating liquid. Part I: Theory, nonlinear attenuation and traveling wave generation

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2012)
  • O. Louisnard

    A simple model of propagation in a cavitating liquid. Part II: Primary Bjerkness force and bubble structures

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2012)
  • A. Moussatov et al.

    Cone-like bubble formation in ultrasonic cavitation field

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2003)
  • C. Campos-Pozuelo et al.

    Experimental and theoretical investigation of the mean acoustic pressure in the cavitation field

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2005)
  • C. Vanhille et al.

    Nonlinear ultrasonic propagation in bubbly liquids: a numerical model

    Ultrasound Med. Biol.

    (2008)
  • C. Vanhille et al.

    Nonlinear ultrasonic waves in bubbly liquids with nonhomogeneous bubble distribution: numerical experiments

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2009)
  • B. Dubus et al.

    On the physical origin of conical bubble structure under an ultrasonic horn

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2010)
  • C. Vanhille et al.

    Nonlinear ultrasonic standing waves: two-dimensional simulations in bubbly liquids

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2011)
  • C. Vanhille et al.

    Acoustic cavitation mechanism: a nonlinear model

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2012)
  • C. Horst et al.

    Design, modeling and performance of a novel sonochemical reactor for heterogeneous reactions

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1996)
  • A. Iula et al.

    Finite element three-dimensional analysis of the vibrational behaviour of the Langevin-type transducer

    Ultrasonics

    (2002)
  • J.A. Gallego-Juárez et al.

    Power ultrasonic transducers with extensive radiators for industrial processing

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (2010)
  • Cited by (96)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Deceased.

    View full text