Elsevier

Waste Management

Volume 30, Issue 7, July 2010, Pages 1341-1347
Waste Management

Coal fly ash based carbons for SO2 removal from flue gases

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.01.035Get rights and content

Abstract

Two different coal fly ashes coming from the burning of two coals of different rank have been used as a precursor for the preparation of steam activated carbons. The performance of these activated carbons in the SO2 removal was evaluated at flue gas conditions (100 °C, 1000 ppmv SO2, 5% O2, 6% H2O). Different techniques were used to determine the physical and chemical characteristics of the samples in order to explain the differences found in their behaviour. A superior SO2 removal capacity was shown by the activated carbon obtained using the fly ash coming from a subbituminous–lignite blend. Experimental results indicated that the presence of higher amount of certain metallic oxides (Ca, Fe) in the carbon-rich fraction of this fly ash probably has promoted a deeper gasification in the activation with steam. A more suitable surface chemistry and textural properties have been obtained in this case which explains the higher efficiency shown by this sample in the SO2 removal.

Introduction

Fly ash (FA) is the main by-product of coal combustion. When pulverized coal is combusted in a dry-ash, dry-bottom boiler, about 80% of all the ash leaves the furnace as fly ash. FAs consist mainly of oxides of silica, aluminum, iron and calcium. Some unburned or partially burned carbon residue is collected with the FA in the precipitators (Lindon, 2001).

Approximately 45 million tons were produced in 2005 in the EU15 (ECOBA, 2005). About 50% of this annual production is used in the cement industry, as FAs show pozzolanic properties after reacting with lime and water and contains SiO2 and Al2O3 as major components. However, NOx emissions reduction, through the installation of “low-air” burner retrofits and low NOx burners, often results in higher unburned carbon contents, and therefore in a decreased marketability of the ashes. According to ASTM C618, a FA having a loss-on-ignition (LOI) greater than 6% becomes unusable for cement or concrete manufacture, this value decreasing in many US departments to 3–4%. The European Standard (UNI-EN 206) accepts a LOI of 5%. Another 42% of the annual production of FAs in the EU is used as a replacement for naturally occurring resources and the rest is disposed.

The fate of the unburned carbon present in FAs is mainly disposal, due to the present lack of routes for their effective use. In last years, unburned carbon has been explored as low cost adsorbent replacing activated carbon as an adsorbent for the treatment of wastewater (Graham et al., 1996, Wang et al., 2005, Wang and Li, 2007) mercury adsorption (Maroto-Valer et al., 2005, Lopez-Alonso et al., 2007), CO2 capture (Arenillas et al., 2005, Maroto-Valer et al., 2008) and also as catalyst in low temperature NO reduction with ammonia (Rubio et al., 2007). Indeed, the carbon present in FAs can be a precursor of activated carbons since it has gone through a devolatilization during the combustion in the furnace of the power station and, therefore, it only requires a process of activation (Baltrus et al., 2001, Lu et al., 2008).

An application few explored until the present of the activated carbons obtained from carbon fly ash is the SO2 removal from stack gas (Davini, 2002, Izquierdo and Rubio, 2008). Sulphur dioxide is an important air pollutant that causes photochemical smog and acid rain. This knowledge has led to increasing regulation of exhaust emissions from stationary combustion sources. The removal of SO2 over a carbon in the presence of oxygen and water vapor at low temperature involves a series of reactions that leads to the formation of sulphuric acid as the final product. The role of a carbon material is to allow the adsorption of SO2, H2O and O2 at the internal surface of the carbon, the catalytic oxidation of adsorbed SO2 to sulphuric acid and the storage of the generated acid in the pores (Richter, 1990). So, the adsorptive capacity of these carbons will be determined not only by their porous structure but also by their surface chemical composition.

The aim of the present work is to evaluate the SO2 abatement capacity of steam activated carbons prepared from two coal fly ashes of different origin and characteristics.

Section snippets

Samples preparation

Two class of FA (F type), from two pulverized coal power stations were examined in this study: Lada (505 MW) and Escucha (160 MW). The coal burned in Lada is an anthracite one, while in Escucha a blend of 70% lignite–30% bituminous is used. The FAs were collected in both cases from mechanical precipitators.

A series of preliminary enrichments were conducted to increase the amount of carbon in the FA. Approximately 50 kg of each FA were sieved into different mesh fractions in order to select the

Characterization

Elemental analysis, LOI and ash content of the samples are given in Table 1. The very low hydrogen content indicates a high degree of condensation, as corresponds to a partially burned coal. After the two concentration process of sieving and oil agglomeration, the carbon content increased from 2–7% C in original FAs to 64–68% C in agglomerated samples. A lower content in ash could be expected after the agglomeration process, but previous studies (Rubio et al., 2008) performed on these samples

Conclusions

The carbon-enriched fractions obtained from fly ashes generated in pulverized coal combustion were used as precursors of activated carbons. After activation with steam, an activated carbon with medium surface area can be obtained for environmental applications. This study has shown that not all unburned coal is equally suitable for obtaining activated carbons with good performance in SO2 removal. The type of burned coal influences the extent of activation, and hence the behaviour of the

Acknowledgements

The Ministry of Science and Innovation and the European Community (European Regional Development Fund) provided financial support for this work (Project No. CTM2004-04252C02). The authors acknowledge Electric Power Stations in Lada and Escucha for supplying the FAs used in this work.

References (37)

Cited by (0)

View full text