Effects of thermal treatment on high solid anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Enhancement assessment and kinetic analysis
Graphical abstract
Introduction
With rapid expansion of animal farms, the amount of livestock manure is increasing each year (Huang et al., 2011). The National Bureau of Statistics of People’s Republic of China estimated that over 100 million swine were raised in 2014 and produced more than 200 million tons manure. Owing to its high organic content and high sanitation risk (Wang et al., 2014), livestock manure has become one of the most pressing environmental issues in China. At present, land use in cultivated land is the major disposal method of swine manure in China, but has caused severe pollution due to overloading (Qiu et al., 2013). Thus, “reduction” is the most important goal of treating swine manure. Generally, stabilization techniques including composting, aerobic treatment and anaerobic digestion (AD) are recommended to treat manure before land use in Chinese legislation (MEP, 2009). Among them, AD is an environmentally sustainable technique, because it can reduce and stabilize organic matters, recycle energy, reduce pathogens, and decrease unpleasant odor (Appels et al., 2008).
Conventional AD, which is conducted at 2–6% solid content (Liu et al., 2016b), requires large digester volume (Li et al., 2015a). Moreover, it produces large amounts of digestate, and thus poses some severe disposal challenges. HSAD, an emerging AD technique, can overcome the abovementioned disadvantages of conventional AD because its solid content was higher than 8% (Liu et al., 2016b). Many studies have investigated HSAD of various substrates, e.g. sewage sludge (Liu et al., 2016a), manure (Sun et al., 2016), rape straw (Tian et al., 2017), and organic municipal solid waste (Di Maria et al., 2017). However, the methane production rate of HSAD is relatively poor (Zhang et al., 2014). The methane production rate obtained in HSAD of chicken manure at 22.4% solid content was less than 20 mL CH4/g VS, while that of conventional AD of chicken manure at 5% solid content was around 180 mL CH4/g VS (Li et al., 2013). Møller et al. (2007) also identified that the methane production rate of swine manure was 300 mL CH4/g VS in the conventional AD, while it was 200 mL CH4/g VS in HSAD. Moreover, the methane production rate decreases as solid content increases. For example, it was 410, 385, 361, and 318 mL CH4/g VS at the VS concentration of 8, 16, 32, and 64gVS/L, respectively (Li et al., 2015b). Obviously, low methane production rate was the bottleneck of the application of HSAD.
Thermal treatment could enhance AD of various substrates (Shao et al., 2013), such as sludge (Dhar et al., 2012, Liao et al., 2016, Liu et al., 2012), food waste (Ariunbaatar et al., 2015), and kitchen waste (Li and Jin, 2015). For example, methane potential of activated sludge increased 34.8% when the sludge was thermally pretreated at 175 °C for 60 min in Liu’s study (Liu et al., 2012). Carrere et al. (2009) also conducted thermal treatment on manure of 5% solid content at 70 °C and 90 °C for 3 h, and it increased the methane production rate by 70% and 89%, respectively. Thermal treatment under 170 °C for 30 min could also enhance the methane production rate of swine manure by 35% at 3.9% solid content (Gonzalez-Fernandez et al., 2008). On the other hand, thermal pretreatment could decrease the hygiene risk significantly as pasteurization, and could meet the requirements of Class A biosolids in US regulation 40 CFR Part 503 (USEPA, 1994). It is worth noting that the solid contents of thermal treatment and AD were usually lower than 17% and 5% in previous studies (Carrere et al., 2009, Ferreira et al., 2014, Gonzalez-Fernandez et al., 2008). So far, the usage of thermal treatment is very limited in practice due to the high energy-consumption.
In order to improve HSAD’s methane production and reduce the digestate, an improved thermal treatment was proposed, i.e. raw swine manure (>20% solid content) without any dilution was treated at 70 ± 1 °C. Then, the thermally treated manure was anaerobically digested at solid content of 8.9% to study the enhancement of the improved thermal treatment on HSAD. Compared to the thermal treatment in previous studies, the improved thermal treatment in this study could save more than 30% of consumed energy and volume of thermal treatment tank. Furthermore, the combined HSAD at 8.9% solid content could also save more than 60% digester volume and heating energy, and decrease 60% digestate as compared to conventional AD. Thus, the process “thermal treatment of raw manure + HSAD” is of great practical importance. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first investigation on this process.
AD is a complex biochemical reaction, and kinetic models can not only facilitate its understanding but also provide key parameters to design reactors, predict methane production, and optimize reaction performance (Zhen et al., 2015). The first-order kinetic model is a very classical model (Zhen et al., 2015) which has been widely used to study AD of various substrates. It assumes the hydrolysis to be the rate-limiting step of AD, and is useful for revealing the AD kinetics mechanism of various substrates (Dennehy et al., 2016, Pellera et al., 2016, Zhao et al., 2016). Pellera et al. (2016) employed this model to identify the effects of alkaline pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of olive mill solid waste, and confirmed a dosage of alkaline of 0–2 mmol/gVS at 25 °C could significantly increase hydrolysis rate. Furthermore, hydrolysis rate could reach 0.28 d−1 in anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and swine manure (Dennehy et al., 2016), while it was 0.02–0.12 d−1 in the AD of fruit residues (Zhao et al., 2016). However, the first-order kinetics model assumes that the substrate is of components with same hydrolysis rate. Obviously, this assumption does not fit with some organic wastes, and therefore a superimposed first-order kinetic model (Gu, 1992) was introduced in this study. This model treats the components of the substrate as three groups according to their hydrolysis rate, i.e. readily biodegradable, poorly biodegradable and non-biodegradable organics. It provides more information about the biodegradation of organic components during AD. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time that the superimposed first-order kinetic model is applied in AD.
Section snippets
Raw manure and inoculum
Raw swine manure was from a pig farm in Daxing district, Beijing, China. The inoculum was also from a full-scaled anaerobic digester treating swine manure in the same region. The characteristics of the manure and inoculum are shown in Table 1. The main components of the manure included protein (more than 60% volatile solid (VS)), cellulose, and hemicellulose. The sum of the latter two components was more than 30% VS. It is worth noting that the components of manure are of different
Chemical oxygen demand
COD is usually regarded as an important parameter of organic compound concentration, while SCOD reflects the soluble organic level (Zhen et al., 2015). Fig. 2 illustrates the decrease in COD with the extension of RT, which indicated the degradation of organic compounds during the thermal treatment. The decline of SCOD (shown in Fig. 2) indicated that the hydrolysis rate of particulate organics was less than the utilization rate of soluble organics. This somewhat conflicted with the results of
Conclusions
The process of “improved thermal treatment on raw manure without any dilution + HSAD” was proposed and investigated in this study. The thermal treatment could enhance the methane production rate by up to 39%. Kinetic analysis showed that the thermal treatment increased biodegradable organics, especially readily biodegradable organics. Thus, the process is of great practical importance.
Notes
All authors declare no actual or potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
Financial support for this research was provided by the Natural Science Foundation of China [51678338], National Major Science and Technology Project about Water Pollution Control [2014ZX07114001], and the Opening Project of Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Treatment and Resource Recycle (SWUST) of Ministry of Education [10zxgk08].
References (41)
- et al.
Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge
Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.
(2008) - et al.
Influence of low temperature thermal pre-treatment on sludge solubilisation, heavy metal release and anaerobic digestion
Bioresour. Technol.
(2010) - et al.
Enhanced mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste by thermal pretreatment: substrate versus digestate heating
Waste Manage.
(2015) - et al.
Improving pig manure conversion into biogas by thermal and thermo-chemical pretreatments
Bioresour. Technol.
(2009) - et al.
Synergism and effect of high initial volatile fatty acid concentrations during food waste and pig manure anaerobic co-digestion
Waste Manage.
(2016) - et al.
Techno-economic evaluation of ultrasound and thermal pretreatments for enhanced anaerobic digestion of municipal waste activated sludge
Waste Manage.
(2012) - et al.
Solid anaerobic digestion batch with liquid digestate recirculation and wet anaerobic digestion of organic waste: comparison of system performances and identification of microbial guilds
Waste Manage.
(2017) - et al.
Thermal steam explosion pretreatment to enhance anaerobic biodegradability of the solid fraction of pig manure
Bioresour. Technol.
(2014) - et al.
Anaerobic digestion of maize and cellulose under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions – a comparative study
Biomass Bioenergy
(2013) - et al.
Different pretreatments for increasing the anaerobic biodegradability in swine manure
Bioresour. Technol.
(2008)
Characterization of animal manure and cornstalk ashes as affected by incineration temperature
Appl. Energy
Comparison of anaerobic digestion characteristics and kinetics of four livestock manures with different substrate concentrations
Bioresour. Technol.
Effects of thermal pretreatment on acidification phase during two-phase batch anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste
Renew. Energy
Biogas production from co-digestion of corn stover and chicken manure under anaerobic wet, hemi-solid, and solid state conditions
Bioresour. Technol.
Accelerated high-solids anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge using low-temperature thermal pretreatment
Int. Biodeterior. Biodegradation
Characterization of methanogenic activity during high-solids anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge
Biochem. Eng. J.
Evolution of microbial community along with increasing solid concentration during high-solids anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge
Bioresour. Technol.
Effect of thermal pretreatment on the physical and chemical properties of municipal biomass waste
Waste Manage.
Process performance of biogas digesters incorporating pre-separated manure
Livestock Sci.
Conductive heating and microwave hydrolysis under identical heating profiles for advanced anaerobic digestion of municipal sludge
Water Res.
Cited by (40)
Enhancing kitchen waste anaerobic digestion by recycled aluminum industry waste: Alkali treatment and potential electron transfer mechanism
2024, Journal of Environmental Chemical EngineeringA review of high-solid anaerobic digestion (HSAD): From transport phenomena to process design
2023, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsA critical review on dry anaerobic digestion of organic waste: Characteristics, operational conditions, and improvement strategies
2023, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsDual character of methane production improvement and antibiotic resistance genes reduction by nano-Fe<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> addition during anaerobic digestion of swine manure
2022, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :The higher concentrations of NF should have caused cell death, resulting in decreased methane production. The degradation of easily-degradable organics formed the 1st peak, while the poorly-biodegradable organics formed the 2nd peak (Wu et al., 2017). Modified Gompertz was used to conduct the kinetic study for the cumulative methane production (Table 1).