Short communicationPrediction of wear coefficient of Al6061–TiO2 composites
Introduction
Aluminium alloys have excellent mechanical properties coupled with good corrosion resistance. However, they possess poor wear and seizure resistance. To improve the above said properties, researchers have successfully dispersed various hard and soft reinforcements such as SiC, Al2O3, flyash, glass, WC, graphite, mica, coconut shell char in aluminium alloys by different processing routes [1], [2], [3]. Of all the processing routes, liquid metallurgy method is the most sought after owing to its several advantages such as economical, mass production, near net shaped components can be produced [4]. Use of TiO2 as reinforcement in aluminium alloys has received little attention although it possess high hardness and modulus with superior corrosion resistance [3]. Of all the aluminum alloys, 6061 is quite popular choice as a matrix material to prepare metal matrix composites owing to its better formability characteristics and option of modification of the strength of composites by adopting optimal heat treatment [5].
In recent years, aluminum alloy based metal matrix composites (MMCs) are being explored as candidate materials in several interesting applications such as piston, connecting rod, contactors, where sliding is a key component [3]. Excessive wear due to sliding will ultimately result in seizure of the mating parts sometimes leading to catastrophic failure [6]. Hence, prediction of the wear behaviour of the sliding components is of utmost importance avoiding huge economic losses. Tribological characteristics of several MMC systems involving glass, flyash, SiC, graphite, mica, Al2O3 as discontinuous dispersoids have been reported [7], [8], [9], [10]. However, meagre data is available as regards the theoretical prediction of wear behaviour of MMCs. Recently, Yang has developed a theoretical model predicting the wear behaviour of MMCs based on the modification of Archard's wear model [11]. It is reported that wear coefficient is a better measure of wear behaviour of materials as it takes care of both the material properties and the operating conditions [11]. Based on the above considerations, this study was conducted to investigate the effects of weight fractions of TiO2, load and sliding distance on the experimental and predicted wear coefficient of the developed cast Al6061–TiO2 composites.
Section snippets
Experimental details
A liquid metallurgy route has been adopted to prepare the cast composites as described in our earlier works [5]. Al6061 has been chosen as the matrix alloy. Preheated titanium-dioxide (TiO2) powder of laboratory grade purity of particle size 10–20 μm was introduced into the vortex of the molten alloy after effective degassing. Mechanical stirring of the molten alloy for duration of 10 min was achieved by using ceramic-coated steel impeller. A speed of 400 rpm was maintained. A pouring temperature
Results and discussions
The microphotographs of both the matrix alloy of Al6061 and its composites are shown in Fig. 1. Micrographs clearly reveal minimal microporosities in the castings. Uniform distribution of TiO2 particles is observed. Good bond between the matrix and the particle is evident from the SEM micrograph as shown in Fig. 2. The variation of hardness of composites with increased contents of TiO2 is shown in Fig. 3. Increased contents of TiO2 enhances the hardness of composites. This can be attributed to
Archard model
The wear coefficient of the matrix alloy and its composites has been evaluated using the standard steady wear equation proposed by Archard as given below:where V is volumetric wear loss, L sliding distance, P normal load and H is the Brinnel hardness, while KS is the dimensionless standard wear coefficient. The variation of experimental wear coefficient with increased content of TiO2 is shown in Fig. 7. Increased content of TiO2 decreases the wear coefficient of composites which can
Conclusions
Al6061–TiO2 composites exhibited higher hardness, lower wear coefficient when compared with the matrix alloy. Increased loads and sliding distances resulted in higher volumetric wear loss but lowered the wear coefficient for both the matrix alloy and its composites. However, under identical test conditions, Al6061–8 wt% TiO2 possessed the lowest wear coefficient. The predicted wear coefficients are in close agreement with the experimental values.
References (15)
Wear coefficient equations for aluminium based matrix composites against steel disc
Wear
(2003)- et al.
Comp. Sci. Technol.
(1997) - et al.
Tribological characteristics of nickel composite coatings
Wear
(2003) - et al.
Effects of reinforcements on sliding wear behaviour of aluminium matrix composites
Wear
(2003) - et al.
Dry wear of Al–graphite particle composites
Wear
(1981) - et al.
Effects of SiC dispersion on the sliding wear characteristics of an Al–Cu alloy
- et al.
Developments in cast metal matrix composites over last three and half decades