Elsevier

Wear

Volume 315, Issues 1–2, 15 July 2014, Pages 31-37
Wear

Microstructural developments during abrasion of M50 bearing steel

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2014.03.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Development of ferritic structure during abrasion.

  • Development of martensite structure during abrasion.

  • Martensite lath sheared feature during abrasion.

  • Higher abrasion resistance of martensite than ferrite.

Abstract

Current study has been carried out to compare the development of microstructure in deformed zone of M50 bearing steel during abrasion. Three-body abrasive wear was carried out using abrasive test apparatus as per ASTM G 65-85 with applied load of 13 kg. Silica sand of dimension 200±50 μm was used as abrasives. The effect of deformed features in abrasion resistance has also been delineated. Crystallographic lath pocket oriented sheared features were observed after abrasion of martensite. Very less fractions of crystallographic sheared features were observed after abrasion of ferrite. The abrasion did not produce dislocation cell structure in ferrite. Ferrite associated just more dynamic recovery while martensite was concomitant to greater dynamic recrystallization. Major toughness enhancement by abundant sheared features and dynamic recrystallization in martensite resulted in higher abrasion resistance of martensite than ferrite.

Introduction

Progress in science and technology has increased the demand for bearing materials with enhanced properties used in demanding environment. It has resulted in development of several varieties of bearing steels [1], [2], [3], [4]. Aerospace engines require the bearing steel to be used at elevated temperature in the range of 300–350 °C. The secondary hardened M50 steel is one of the best to retain its high strength, hardness, toughness and contact fatigue resistance for elevated temperature use [5]. Though, rolling contact fatigue property is one of the crucial parameters defining the quality of bearing material, the bearings also go through other tribological phenomenon such as abrasion. Failure analysis of engineering components indeed reveals that typically components fail by abrasion due to depletion of lubricants, generation of debris and ingestion of dirt [6], [7], [8]. Therefore, the abrasion resistance of M50 steel has been the topic of the current study.

The progressive trend of abrasion resistant steel development is oriented to proper microstructural design. Plastic deformation during wear and abrasion produces dislocations, dislocations cells, grain refinement and deformation bands [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. The formation of deformed structure is governed by composition and crystal structure [17], [18], [19]. The role played by Stacking Fault Energy (SFE) in this context is crucial [20].

The hard martensite is believed to be associated with the highest abrasion resistance [21]. Report has showed that comparatively softer multiphase steels with high ductility and toughness can have higher sliding wear resistance than harder steels [22]. The earlier result has also been strengthened by other data [23]. According to Rendón et al. the additional high toughness as well as with hardness could be the best way to enhance impact and sliding abrasion resistance [24]. The hardened surface of steels by nitro-carburizing induces compressive residual stress and it provides additional abrasion resistance [25]. Reports suggest that wear rate varies with the thermal stability of the phases, resistance to plastic deformation and resistance to micro-crack initiation and propagation. The order of increasing sliding wear resistance for steel has been found to be (martensite+carbide+retained austenite)–(ferrite+globular carbide)–(martensite)–(bainite)–(lamellar pearlite) [22], [26], [27].

The developed microstructural features of materials after abrasion have hardly been studied. Ives [10] and Brygmann et al. [11] have reported formation of fine grain crystalline structure and dislocation cell structure beneath the abraded surface of Cu and Cu thin film respectively. Lawless [13] also has noted dislocation cell structure in the region below the worn surface of Cu film. Dislocation concept in friction and wear has been discussed extensively with the help of TEM images by Kuhlmann-Wilsdorf [14]. Ultra-fine grained aluminum layers, which extend up to 10 μm, have been formed beneath the tribolayers under sliding wear conditions as reported by Li et al. [16]. These fine-grained structures were presumably formed due to severe plastic deformation because the microstructural investigations did not show signs of recrystallization under the wear conditions.

With the above background and also because of the fact that deformation behavior of the material during abrasion is associated with some structural features, the current study has been carried out. It has explored the development of microstructure in the deformed zone and emphasized the effect of structural features in the abrasion resistance of M50 bearing steel.

Section snippets

Material and methods

Bearing steel with composition as given in Table 1 was used as investigated material. The steel contains 3.72 wt% Cr, 4 wt% Mo, 1 wt% V and about 0.72 wt% C. The composition in weight percentage (%) was analyzed using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrophotometer and the interstitial elements were analyzed by LECO instrument.

During hardening treatment material was preheated to 850 °C soaked for 30 min. The temperature was then raised from 850 °C to 1110 °C, soaked for five minutes

Results

The true stress (σ)–true strain (ε) plots of this alloy before and after hardening are presented in Fig. 2. From these plots various parameters like yield strength (σYS), ultimate tensile strength (σUTS), uniform strain (εu), and fracture strain (εf) have been determined. The tensile properties of these materials are listed in Table 2. Ferrite reveals higher ductility and toughness than martensite.

The SEM micrographs in Fig. 3(i) and (ii) reveal the ferritic structure before hardening and

Discussion

Deformation behavior of metallic materials during abrasion has several similar and dissimilar features. During abrasion the stress state under which the plastic deformation occurs is multi-directional and compressive. As the thickness of the sample or the component is considerably larger than the plastic zone size, the plastic zone surrounding the indenting particle is completely confined. These features develop constrained plastic flow in the presence of hydrostatic compressive stresses. The

Conclusions

  • (i)

    Lath pocket oriented sheared features were found after abrasion of martensitic structure but very less fractions of crystallographic shear bands were observed after abrasion of ferrite.

  • (ii)

    Taylor factor based on high work hardening rate and accumulation of high localized strain during abrasion developed shear band.

  • (iii)

    Ferrite associated just more recovery while martensite was concomitant to greater dynamic recrystallization.

  • (iv)

    Major toughening by abundant sheared features and dynamic recrystallization of

Acknowledgments

Authors gratefully acknowledge the grant for the project Speciality steel in defence application DMR-292 by DRDO and would like to sincerely thank director DMRL, Dr. A.A. Gokhale for his continuous encouragement.

References (40)

Cited by (59)

  • Scratch damage on guiding surfaces of high-speed bearings under oil cut-off condition

    2022, Engineering Failure Analysis
    Citation Excerpt :

    There is no doubt that the failure behavior of high-speed bearings at impact sliding contacts is deeply affected by a large amount of the frictional heat. In addition to the above-mentioned mechanism, the microstructure of the material also significantly influences the surface damage of high-speed bearings [21,22]. Both the shape and distribution of carbides can affect the stress distribution and the fatigue life of the material [23].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text