Elsevier

World Development

Volume 52, December 2013, Pages 92-103
World Development

Does Economic Globalization affect Regional Inequality? A Cross-country Analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.002Get rights and content

Summary

This paper investigates the relationship between economic globalization and regional inequality in a panel of 47 countries over the period 1990–2007, using a measure of globalization that distinguishes the different dimensions of economic integration. The results show that there is a positive and statistically significant association between economic globalization and the magnitude of regional disparities. Countries with a greater degree of economic integration with the rest of the world tend to register higher levels of regional inequality. This finding is robust to the inclusion of additional explanatory variables and to the choice of the specific measure used to quantify the relevance of spatial inequality within the sample countries. Our analysis also reveals that the spatial impact of economic globalization is greater in low- and middle-income countries, whose levels of regional disparities are on average significantly higher than in high-income countries.

Introduction

The territorial impact of globalization remains a hotly debated topic (e.g., Bhagwati, 2004, Stiglitz, 2002). The unprecedented levels of integration have surpassed the previous peak reached before the First World War (Findlay & O’Rourke, 2007) and are leaving a profound imprint on economic growth (Alcalá and Ciccone, 2004, Frankel and Romer, 1999), income inequality and poverty (Milanovic, 2005a, Wade, 2004), labor markets (Dreher and Gaston, 2007, Tomohara and Takii, 2011), environmental quality (Antweiler et al., 2001, Frankel and Rose, 2005), democracy and human rights (Dreher et al., 2012, Rudra, 2005), or the quality of government (Al-Marhubi, 2004, Ezcurra, 2012).

Globalization also has an important impact on regional inequality (i.e., inequality across the various regions within a country) worldwide (e.g., Rodríguez-Pose, 2012, Rodríguez-Pose and Gill, 2006). However, our understanding of the link between globalization and regional inequality is still highly partial. Previous contributions to this field have tended to measure the incidence of economic globalization using mostly different indicators of the degree of trade openness of the countries considered. While from a policy perspective, the relationship between trade openness and regional inequality is undoubtedly relevant (World Bank, 2008), the degree of trade openness is not an adequate measure to capture the incidence of other aspects of economic globalization, such as the extent of capital controls or the amount of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). This is potentially important as it is not evident that the various dimensions of economic globalization affect regional inequality in the same way. Thus, the impact observed for one aspect may be caused by the omission from the analysis of other important aspects of economic integration. Overlooking capital controls or FDI, while focusing exclusively on levels of trade, can seriously affect our perception of the relationship between globalization and spatial inequality (Dreher, 2006).

This paper aims to overcome this omission in the literature and to provide a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between economic globalization and regional inequality. In order to achieve this aim, we use the KOF index of globalization constructed by Dreher (2006) and updated by Dreher, Gaston, and Martens (2008). This aggregate index distinguishes between the different aspects of economic integration, which allows us to adopt a broader perspective than existing studies. We are thus capable of approaching the analysis of the effects of economic globalization on regional disparities taking into account the challenges posed by integration in a more comprehensive way than hitherto and to identify who wins and who loses, not only within each country, but also across countries.

The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. After this introduction, Section 2 provides a necessarily brief review of the theoretical and empirical literature on the link between globalization and spatial inequality. Section 3 describes the different measures used in our study to quantify the incidence of globalization and regional inequality in the sample countries. Section 4 presents the empirical analysis carried out in the paper to examine the relationship between economic globalization and regional inequality. The final section offers the main conclusions from our work.

Section snippets

Economic globalization and spatial inequality in the literature

Although globalization and spatial inequalities on their own have attracted considerable attention in recent years, their relationship has, somewhat surprisingly, been overlooked by the scholarly literature (Brülhart, 2011, Rodríguez-Pose, 2012). This contrasts with the large interest accorded over the last two decades to the impact of economic integration on growth (e.g., Alcalá and Ciccone, 2004, Alesina et al., 2000, Frankel and Romer, 1999), and interpersonal inequality and poverty (e.g.,

Data and preliminary evidence

In order to assess whether economic globalization affects regional inequality, we first need to quantify the relevance of regional disparities within each country. To that end, we follow Theil (1967) in proposing the ensuing measure of inequality:T(0)i=j=1Jpjlogμyjwhere y and p are respectively the GDP per capita and the population share of region j in country i, and μ=j=1Jpjyj.2 T(0)

The model

We estimate different versions of the following model in order to address the issue of omitted variables in the relationship between globalization and regional disparities:INEQit=α+βGLOBit+γXit+εitwhere INEQ is our measure of regional inequality in country i and year t, GLOB is the KOF index of economic globalization, X denotes a set of variables that control for additional factors considered to have an influence on regional disparities, and ε is the corresponding disturbance term. The

Conclusions

This paper has analyzed the relationship between economic globalization and regional inequality in a panel of 47 countries over the period 1990–2007. We have resorted to a broader notion of economic globalization than in previous studies of the topic. This allows us to take into consideration the role played in this context by a number of different dimensions of economic integration.

Our results show a positive association between the degree of economic openness and the magnitude of

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to three anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions to an earlier version of the article. This research has benefited from the generous financial support of the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Grant agreement n 269868 and of Project ECO2011-29314-C02-01 of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness.

References (79)

  • R. Shankar et al.

    Bridging the economic divide within countries: A scorecard on the performance of regional policies in reducing regional income disparities

    World Development

    (2003)
  • A. Tomohara et al.

    Does globalization benefit developing countries? Effects of FDI on local wages

    Journal of Policy Modeling

    (2011)
  • R.H. Wade

    Is globalization reducing poverty and inequality?

    World Development

    (2004)
  • F. Alcalá et al.

    Trade and productivity

    Quarterly Journal of Economics

    (2004)
  • A. Alesina et al.

    Fractionalization

    Journal of Economic Growth

    (2003)
  • A. Alesina et al.

    Economic integration and political disintegration

    American Economic Review

    (2000)
  • F. Al-Marhubi

    The determinants of governance: A cross-country analysis

    Contemporary Economic Policy

    (2004)
  • O. Alonso-Villar

    Large metropolises in the third world: An explanation

    Urban Studies

    (2001)
  • W. Antweiler et al.

    Is free trade good for the environment?

    American Economic Review

    (2001)
  • R. Barro et al.

    Convergence across states and regions

    Brooking Papers on Economic Activity

    (1991)
  • R. Barro et al.

    Convergence

    Journal of Political Economy

    (1992)
  • R. Barro et al.

    Economic growth

    (1995)
  • D. Belsley et al.

    Regression diagnostics

    (1980)
  • R.A. Berk

    A primer on robust regression

  • J. Bhagwati
  • F. Bourguignon

    Decompasable income inequality measures

    Econometrica

    (1979)
  • R. Breen et al.

    Income inequality and macroeconomic volatility: An empirical investigation

    Review of Development Economics

    (2005)
  • M. Brülhart

    The spatial effects of trade openness: A survey

    Review of World Economics

    (2011)
  • F. Cowell

    Measuring inequality

    (1995)
  • D. Dollar et al.

    Trade, growth and poverty

    Economic Journal

    (2004)
  • A. Dreher

    Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization

    Applied Economics

    (2006)
  • A. Dreher et al.

    Has globalization really had no effect on unions?

    Kyklos

    (2007)
  • A. Dreher et al.

    Has globalization increased inequality?

    Review of International Economics

    (2008)
  • A. Dreher et al.

    Globalization, economic freedom and human rights

    Journal of Conflict Resolution

    (2012)
  • A. Dreher et al.

    Measuring globalization—Gauging its consequences

    (2008)
  • W. Easterly et al.

    Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions

    Quarterly Journal of Economics

    (1997)
  • R. Ezcurra

    Is there a link between globalization and governance?

    Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy

    (2012)
  • R. Ezcurra et al.

    Measuring the regional divide

  • B. Faber

    Towards the spatial patterns of sectoral adjustments to trade liberalisation: The case of NAFTA in Mexico

    Growth and Change

    (2007)
  • Cited by (104)

    • The cost of political uncertainty: Evidence from Catalonia

      2022, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization
    • Global renewable energy trade network: patterns and determinants

      2024, Environmental Science and Pollution Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text