Feature
Fingerprint verification competition 2006

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-4765(07)70140-6Get rights and content

The interest in fingerprint-based biometric systems has constantly grown in recent years and considerable efforts have been focused by both academia and industry on the development of new algorithms for fingerprint recognition. Raffaele Cappelli, Matteo Ferrara, Annalisa Franco and Davide Maltoni of the Biometric System Laboratory at the University of Bologna explain the findings of the Fingerprint Verification Competition 2006.

Section snippets

Databases

Four databases created using three different scanners and the SFinGe synthetic generator were used in the FVC2006 benchmark (see Table 2). Figure 1 shows an example image at the same scale factor from each database.

Different from the first three editions of FVC, data collection in FVC2006 was performed without deliberately introducing difficulties such as exaggerated distortion, large amounts of rotation and displacement, wet/dry impressions, etc, but the population is more heterogeneous and

Testing protocol

Participants submitted each algorithm in the form of two executable programs: the first for enrolling a fingerprint image and producing the corresponding template, and the second for comparing a fingerprint template to a fingerprint image and producing a comparison score in the range [0,1]. The input includes a database-specific configuration file. Each algorithm is tested by performing, for each database, the following comparisons:

  • Genuine recognition attempts: the template of each

Results

The following performance indicators were measured and made available at the FVC2006 web site (http://bias.csr.unibo.it/fvc2006/)

  • Genuine and impostor score histograms;

  • False Match Rate (FMR) and False Non-Match Rate (FNMR) graphs and Decision Error Trade-off (DET) graph;

  • Failure-to-Enrol Rate (FTE) and Failure-to-Compare Rate (FTC) which can be reported by the algorithm or imposed by the test procedure in case of timeout, program crash, exceeded memory limit, exceeded template limit or

Conclusions

Performance evaluation is important for all pattern recognition applications and particularly so for biometrics, which is receiving widespread international attention for citizen identity verification and identification in large-scale applications. Unambiguously and reliably assessing the current state of the technology is essential for understanding its limitations and addressing future research requirements.

The interest shown in the FVC testing program by algorithm developers continues to be

References (0)

Cited by (156)

  • ZJUT-EIFD: A Synchronously Collected External and Internal Fingerprint Database

    2024, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • High Precision Fingerprint Verification for Small Area Sensor Based on Deep Learning

    2024, IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences
  • Considerations on the Evaluation of Biometric Quality Assessment Algorithms

    2024, IEEE Transactions on Biometrics, Behavior, and Identity Science
View all citing articles on Scopus

This feature was provided by Raffaele Cappelli, Matteo Ferrara, Annalisa Franco and Davide Maltoni of the Biometric System Laboratory, University of Bologna.

View full text