Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T19:34:34.563Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phosphate responses in relation to soil tests and organic phosphorus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. T. Friend
Affiliation:
East African Agriculture and Forestry Research Organization, Kikuyu, Kenya
H. F. Birch
Affiliation:
East African Agriculture and Forestry Research Organization, Kikuyu, Kenya

Extract

Phosphate responses of wheat in a number of soil types have been correlated with the amounts of phosphate extracted by ten different methods. Of these only total organic phosphorus, and inorganic phosphorus extracted with hot 0·1N caustic soda, were significantly related to phosphate response, the former at the 1% level and the latter at the 5% level. The amount of organic phosphorus in the soil was also found to be significantly related, in each instance at the 5% level, to phosphate responses of grass and the percentage phosphate in the grass. When the amount of organic phosphorus was considered together with the phosphate retention capacity of the soil, to give a measure of available mineralized phosphate, the relationships to response (and uptake of phosphorus by grasses) was more significant than with organic phosphorus alone.

The organic phosphorus fraction accounted for about 86% of the total soil phosphorus. Measurable amounts of water-soluble organic phosphorus were found with all the soils. The amounts were, however, not significantly related to phosphate response. Moreover, it was found that while the soil extract containing organic phosphorus decomposed, it did so without the production of mineral phosphate. From this, and further evidence in the literature, it is considered that the organic complex in the soil, rather than the water soluble phosphorus, is the main source for the plant.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Birch, H. F. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, H. F. (1953 a). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, H. F. (1953 b). J. Agric. Sci. 43, 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, H. F. (1959). Plant and Soil (in the Press).Google Scholar
Birch, H. F. & Friend, M. T. (1956). Nature, Lond., 178, 500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, R. H. & Kurtz, L. T. (1945). Soil Sci. 59, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burd, J. S. (1948). Soil Sci. 65, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickman, S. R. & Dettok, E. E. (1938). Soil Sci. 45, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, W. H. & McGeorge, W. T. (1950). Soil Sci. 70, 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, W. H. & McGeorge, W. T. (1951). Soil Sci. 71, 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayashi, T. & Takijima, Y. (1955). J. Sci. Soil Manure, Japan. 26, 135.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. P. (1955). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
McGeorge, W. T. (1932). Tech. Bull. Ariz. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 38.Google Scholar
Nye, P. H. (1952). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 20, 47.Google Scholar
Odynsky, W. (1936). Sci. Agric. 18, 652.Google Scholar
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S. & Dean, L. A. (1954). Circ. U.S. Dep. Agric. no. 939.Google Scholar
Parker, F. W. (1927). Soil Sci. 24, 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, R. W. & Simonson, R. W. (1940). Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 4, 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierre, W. H. & Parker, F. W. (1927). Soil Sci. 24, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, H. T., Pearson, R. W. & Pierre, W. H. (1940). Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 5, 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunder, D. H. (1956). Soil Sci. 82, 457.Google Scholar
Sheard, R. W. & Caldwell, A. G. (1955). Canad. J. Agric. Sci. 35, 36.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. M. (1947). M.S. Thesis, Iowa State College, Ames, Iowa.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. M., Black, C. A. & Zoellner, J. A. (1954). Soil Sci. 77, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truog, E. (1930). J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 22, 874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, T. W. & Adams, A. F. R. (1958). Soil Sci. 85, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. H. (1950). J. Agric. Sci. 40, 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar