Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T12:47:58.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wake instability of a fixed spheroidal bubble

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2007

JACQUES MAGNAUDET  and
GUILLAUME MOUGIN
JACQUES MAGNAUDET
Affiliation:
Institut de Mécanique des Fluides de Toulouse, UMR CNRS/INPT/UPS 5502, Allée Camille Soula, 31400 Toulouse, France
GUILLAUME MOUGIN
Affiliation:
Institut de Mécanique des Fluides de Toulouse, UMR CNRS/INPT/UPS 5502, Allée Camille Soula, 31400 Toulouse, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Direct numerical simulations of the flow past a fixed oblate spheroidal bubble are carried out to determine the range of parameters within which the flow may be unstable, and to gain some insight into the instability mechanism. The bubble aspect ratio χ (i.e. the ratio of the major axis length over the minor axis length) is varied from 2.0 to 2.5 while the Reynolds number (based on the upstream velocity and equivalent bubble diameter) is varied in the range 102 ≤ Re ≤ 3 × 103. As vorticity generation at the bubble surface is at the root of the instability, theoretical estimates for the maximum of the surface vorticity and the surface vorticity flux are first derived. It is shown that, for large aspect ratios and high Reynolds numbers, the former evolves as χ8/3 while the latter is proportional to χ7/2Re−1/2. Then it is found numerically that the flow first becomes unstable for χ = χc ≈ 2.21. As the surface vorticity becomes independent of Re for large enough Reynolds number, the flow is unstable only within a finite range of Re, this range being an increasing function of χ − χc. An empirical criterion based on the maximum of the vorticity generated at the body surface is built to determine whether the flow is stable or not. It is shown that this criterion also predicts the correct threshold for the wake instability past a rigid sphere, suggesting that the nature of the body surface does not really matter in the instability mechanism. Also the first two bifurcations of the flow are similar in nature to those found in flows past rigid axisymmetric bluff bodies, such as a sphere or a disk. Wake dynamics become more complex at higher Reynolds number, until the Re−1/2-dependency of the surface vorticity flux makes the flow recover its steadiness and eventually its axisymmetry. A qualitative analysis of the azimuthal vorticity field in the base flow at the rear of the bubble is finally carried out to make some progress in the understanding of the primary instability. It is suggested that the instability originates in a thin region of the flow where the vorticity gradients have to turn almost at right angle to satisfy two different constraints, one at the bubble surface, the other within the standing eddy.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 572 , February 2007 , pp. 311 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Batchelor, G. K. 1956 On steady laminar flow with closed streamlines at large Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1987 Hamiltonian theory for motion of bubbles in an infinite liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 181, 349–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco, A. & Magnaudet, J. 1995 The structure of the axisymmetric high-Reynolds number flow around an ellipsoidal bubble of fixed shape. Phys. Fluids 7, 1265–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calmet, I. & Magnaudet, J. 1997 Large-eddy simulation of high-Schmidt number mass transfer in a turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 9, 438–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dandy, D. S. & Leal, L. G. 1986 Boundary layer separation from a smooth slip surface. Phys. Fluids 29, 1360–1366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duineveld, P. C. 1995 The rise of an ellipsoidal bubble in water at high Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 292, 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellingsen, K. & Risso, F. 2001 On the rise of an ellipsoidal bubble in water: oscillatory paths and liquid-induced velocity. J. Fluid Mech. 440, 235–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornberg, B. 1985 Steady viscous flow past a circular cylinder up to Reynolds number 600. J. Comput. Phys. 61, 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fornberg, B. 1988 Steady viscous flow past a sphere at high Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 190, 471–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghidersa, B. & Dušek, J. 2000 Breaking of axisymmetry and onset of unsteadiness in the wake of a sphere. J. Fluid Mech. 423, 33–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartunian, R. A. & Sears, W. R. 1957 On the stability of small gas bubbles moving uniformly in various liquids. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, T. A. & Patel, V. C. 1999 Flow past a sphere up to Reynolds number of 300. J. Fluid Mech. 378, 10–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, H. 1945 Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Dover.Google Scholar
Leal, L. G. 1989 Vorticity transport and wake structure for bluff bodies at finite Reynolds number. Phys. Fluids A 1, 124–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, D. & Magnaudet, J. 1998 The lift force on a spherical bubble in a viscous linear shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 368, 81–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magarvey, R. H. & Bishop, R. L. 1961 Transition range for three-dimensional wakes. Can. J. Phys. 39, 1418–1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnaudet, J. & Eames, I. 2000 The motion of high-Reynolds-number bubbles in inhomogeneous flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 659–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnaudet, J., Rivero, M. & Fabre, J. 1995 Accelerated flows past a rigid sphere or a spherical bubble. Part 1. Steady straining flow. J. Fluid Mech. 284, 97–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiron, D. I. 1989 On the stability of gas bubbles rising in inviscid fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 198, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mittal, R. 1999 Planar symmetry in the unsteady wake of a sphere. AIAA J. 37, 388–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monkewitz, P. A. 1988 A note on vortex shedding from axisymmetric bluff bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 192, 561–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. W. 1963 The boundary layer on a spherical gas bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 16, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. W. 1965 The velocity of rise of distorted gas bubbles in a liquid of small viscosity. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 749–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mougin, G. & Magnaudet, J. 2002 Path instability of a rising bubble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 14502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natarajan, R. & Acrivos, A. 1993 The instability of the steady flow past spheres and disks. J. Fluid Mech. 254, 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormieres, D. & Provansal, M. 1999 Transition to turbulence in the wake of a sphere. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosperetti, A., Ohl, C., Tijink, A., Mougin, G. & Magnaudet, J. 2003 Leonardo's paradox. Appendix to A. Prosperetti, C. D. Ohl & A. Tijink, J. Fluid Mech. 482, 286–289.Google Scholar
Ryskin, G. & Leal, L. G. 1984 Numerical solution of free-boundary problems in fluid mechanics. Part 2. Buoyancy-driven motion of a gas bubble through a quiescent liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M., Leweke, T. & Provansal, M. 2001 Kinematics and dynamics of sphere wake transition. J. Fluids Struct. 15, 1575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomboulides, A. G. & Orszag, S. A. 2000 Numerical investigation of transitional and weak turbulent flow past a sphere. J. Fluid Mech. 416, 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomboulides, A. G., Orszag, S. A. & Karniadakis, G. E. 1993 Direct and large-eddy simulation of axisymetric wakes. AIAA Paper 93-0546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J. Z. 1995 A theory of three-dimensional interfacial vorticity dynamics. Phys. Fluids 7, 2375–2395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, B. & Prosperetti, A. 2007 Linear stability of the flow past a spheroidal bubble. J. Fluid Mech. (to appear).CrossRefGoogle Scholar