Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T19:01:23.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A random-jet-stirred turbulence tank

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

EVAN A. VARIANO  and
EDWIN A. COWEN
EVAN A. VARIANO
Affiliation:
DeFrees Hydraulics Laboratory, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
EDWIN A. COWEN
Affiliation:
DeFrees Hydraulics Laboratory, School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We report measurements of the flow above a planar array of synthetic jets, firing upwards in a spatiotemporally random pattern to create turbulence at an air–water interface. The flow generated by this randomly actuated synthetic jet array (RASJA) is turbulent, with a large Reynolds number and a weak secondary (mean) flow. The turbulence is homogeneous over a large region and has similar isotropy characteristics to those of grid turbulence. These properties make the RASJA an ideal facility for studying the behaviour of turbulence at boundaries, which we do by measuring one-point statistics approaching the air–water interface (via particle image velocimetry). We explore the effects of different spatiotemporally random driving patterns, highlighting design conditions relevant to all randomly forced facilities. We find that the number of jets firing at a given instant, and the distribution of the duration for which each jet fires, greatly affect the resulting flow. We identify and study the driving pattern that is optimal given our tank geometry. In this optimal configuration, the flow is statistically highly repeatable and rapidly reaches steady state. With increasing distance from the jets, there is a jet merging region followed by a planar homogeneous region with a power-law decay of turbulent kinetic energy. In this homogeneous region, we find a Reynolds number of 314 based on the Taylor microscale. We measure all components of mean flow velocity to be less than 10% of the turbulent velocity fluctuation magnitude. The tank width includes roughly 10 integral length scales, and because wall effects persist for one to two integral length scales, there is sizable core region in which turbulent flow is unaffected by the walls. We determine the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy via three methods, the most robust using the velocity structure function. Having a precise value of dissipation and low mean flow allows us to measure the empirical constant in an existing model of the Eulerian velocity power spectrum. This model provides a method for determining the dissipation rate from velocity time series recorded at a single point, even when Taylor's frozen turbulence hypothesis does not hold. Because the jet array offers a high degree of flow control, we can quantify the effects of the mean flow in stirred tanks by intentionally forcing a mean flow and varying its strength. We demonstrate this technique with measurements of gas transfer across the free surface, and find a threshold below which mean flow no longer contributes significantly to the gas transfer velocity.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 604 , 10 June 2008 , pp. 1 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Birouk, M., Sarh, B. & Gökalp, I. 2003 An attempt to realize experimental isotropic turbulence at low Reynolds number. Flow Turb. Combust. 70, 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brumley, B. H. & Jirka, G. H. 1987 Near-surface turbulence in a grid-stirred tank. J. Fluid Mech. 183, 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calmet, I. & Magnaudet, J. 2003 Statistical structure of high-Reynolds-number turbulence close to the free surface of an open-channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 474, 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, E. A. & Monismith, S. G. 1997 A hybrid digital particle tracking velocimetry technique. Exps. Fluids 22, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, P. A. 2004 Turbulence : An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeSilva, I. P. D. & Fernando, H. J. S. 1994 Oscillating grids as a source of nearly isotropic turbulence. Phys Fluids 6, 2455–2464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douady, S., Couder, Y. & Brachet, M. E. 1991 Direct observation of the intermittency of intense vorticity filaments in turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 983–986.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. 1993 An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernando, H. J. S. & DeSilva, I. P. D. 1993 Note on secondary flows in oscillating–grid, mixing–box experiments. Phys Fluids A 5, 1849–1851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frew, N. M., Bock, E. J., Schimpf, U. et al. 2004 Air–sea gas transfer: Its dependence on wind stress, small–scale roughness, and surface films. J. Geophys. Res. 109, C08S17.Google Scholar
Fung, J. C. H., Hunt, J. C. R., Malik, N. A. & Perkins, R. J. 1992 Kinematic simulation of homogeneous turbulence by unsteady random Fourier modes. J. Fluid Mech. 236, 281–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopfinger, E. & Toly, J. 1976 Spatially decaying turbulence and its relation to mixing across density interfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 78, 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. & Graham, J. M. R. 1978 Free-stream turbulence near plane boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 84, 209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, W. & Eaton, J. 2004 Creating homogeneous and isotropic turbulence without a mean flow. Exps. Fluids 36, 444–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kit, E., Fernando, H. J. S. & Brown, J. A. 1995 Experimental examination of Eulerian frequency spectra in zero-mean-shear turbulence. Phys. Fluids 7, 1168–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. 1941 The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 30, 299–303.Google Scholar
Liao, Q. & Cowen, E. A. 2005) An efficient anti-aliasing spectral continuous window shifting technique for PIV. Exps. Fluids 38, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S., Katz, J., & Meneveau, C. 1999 Evolution and modelling of subgrid scales during rapid straining of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech 387, 281–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makita, H. 1991 Realization of a large-scale turbulence field in a small wind-tunnel. Fluid Dyn. Res. 8, 53–64.Google Scholar
Maxey, M. R. 1987 The velocity skewness measured in grid turbulence. Phys. Fluids 30, 935–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDougall, T. J. 1979 Measurements of turbulence in a zero-mean-shear mixed layer. J. Fluid Mech. 94, 409–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenna, S. P. & McGillis, W. R. 2004 The role of free-surface turbulence and surfactants in air–water gas transfer. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 47, 539–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mydlarski, L. & Warhaft, Z. 1996 On the onset of high Reynolds number grid generated wind tunnel turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 320, 331–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouellette, N. T., Xu, H., Bourgoin, M. & Bodenschatz, E. 2006 Small-scale anisotropy in Lagrangian turbulence. New J. Phys. 8, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, B. R., Krogstad, P. A. & van de Water, W. 2002 Measurements of the turbulent energy dissipation rate. Phys. Fluids 14, 1288–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pumir, A. & Shraiman, B. I. 1995 Persistent small scale anisotropy in homogeneous shear flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3114?–3117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, L., Yue, D. K. P. & Triantafyllou, G. S. 2004 Effect of surfactants on free-surface turbulent flows.' J. Fluid Mech. 506, 79–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shy, S. S., Tang, C. Y. & Fann, S. Y. 1997 A nearly isotropic turbulence generated by a pair of vibrating grids. Expl Therm. Fluid Sci. 14, 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, W. H. & Castro, I. P. 1999 Acoustic Doppler velocimeter evaluation in stratified towing tank J. Hydraul. Engng 125, 595–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srdic, A., Fernando, H. J. S. & Montenegro, L. 1996 Generation of nearly isotropic turbulence using two oscillating grids. Exps. Fluids 20, 395–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sveen, J. K. & Cowen, E. A. 2004 Quantitative imaging techniques and their application to wavy flows. In PIV and Water Waves (ed. Grue, J., Liu, P. L. & Pedersen, G. K.). World Scientific.Google Scholar
Tennekes, H. 1975 Eulerian and Lagrangian time microscales in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 561–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, S. M. & Turner, J. S. 1975 Mixing across an interface due to turbulence generated by an oscillating grid. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Variano, E. A., Bodenschatz, E. & Cowen, E. A. 2004 A random synthetic jet array driven turbulence tank. Exps. Fluids. 37, 613–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Variano, E. A. 2007 Measurements of gas transfer and turbulence at a shear-free turbulent air–water interface. PhD Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Voth, G. A., Satyanarayan, K. & Bodenschatz, E. 1998 Lagrangian acceleration measurements at large Reynolds numbers. Phys Fluids 10, 2268–2280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voth, G. A., LaPorta, A., Crawford, A. M., Alexander, J. & Bodenschatz, E. 2002 Measurement of particle accelerations in fully developed turbulence. J. Fluid Mech 469, 121–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villermaux, E., Sixou, B. & Gagne, Y. 1995 Intense vortical structures in grid–generated turbulence. Phys. Fluids 7, 2008–2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, D. R., Brathwaite, A. & Yen, J. 2004 A novel laboratory apparatus for simulating isotropic oceanic turbulence at low Reynolds number. Limnol. Oceanogr.: Methods 2, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar