¹ Lucas Bergkamp, Het Proefdier Mens, De Normering en Regulering van Medische Experimenten met Mensen, Alphen aan den Rijn (Netherlands: Samson HD Tjeenk Willink 1988).

² Cass Sunstein and Richard Thaler, Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Penguin Books 2009).

³ Directive 2004/35/EC 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage [2004] OJ L143/56.

⁴ Directive 94/62/EC of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste [1994] OJ L365/10.

⁵ Regulation 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, [2006] OJ L396/1.

⁶ Lucas Bergkamp (ed.), The European Union REACH Regulation for Chemicals: Law and Practice (Oxford University Press 2013).

⁷ Lucas Bergkamp, “The Privacy Fallacy: Adverse Effects of Europe’s Data Protection Policy in an Information-Driven Economy” (2002) 18(1) Computer Law and Security Report 31.

⁸ Lucas Bergkamp and Turner T Smith, “Legal and Administrative Systems: Implications for Precautionary Regulation” in Jonathan Wiener et al. (eds), The Reality of Precaution, Comparing Risk Regulation in the United States and Europe (Washington DC: RFF Press 2011).

⁹ Lucas Bergkamp, Michael Faure, Monika Hinteregger and Niels Philipsen, Civil Liability in Europe for Terrorism-Related Risk (Cambridge University Press 2015).

¹⁰ Lucas Bergkamp, “Adjudicating Scientific Disputes in Climate Science: The Limits of Judicial Competence and the Risks of Taking Sides” (2015) 23(3) Environmental Liability 80.

¹¹ JA Curry, Statement to the Committee on Science, Space and Technology of the United Sates House of Representatives, Hearing on “The President’s UN Climate Pledge” 15 April 2015. Sarewitz notes that “[c]limate science served one main purpose: to advance [a top-down, coordinated, international emissions governance] regime”: D Sarewitz, “Does climate change knowledge really matter?”, WIRES Climate Change, 2011, DOI: 10.1002/wcc.126.

¹² Bergkamp, supra note 10.

¹³ Lucas Bergkamp, “A Dutch Court’s ‘Revolutionary’ Climate Policy Judgment: The Perversion of Judicial Power, the State’s Duties of Care and Science” (2015) 12 Journal of Environmental & Planning Law 239.

¹⁴ Ulrich Beck, Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (translated by Mark Ritter, Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg eine andere Modern. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp 1986; London: Sage 1992).

¹⁵ Lucas Bergkamp, “The Concept of Risk Society as a Model for Risk Regulation – its Hidden and Not so Hidden Ambitions, Side effects, and Risks” (2016) Journal of Risk Research 1.

¹⁶ Bridget M Hutter, “What Makes a Regulator Excellent? A Risk Regulation Perspective”, Penn Program on Regulation’s Best-in-Class Regulator Initiative, June 2015.

¹⁷ Peter Strauss, Turner Smith and Lucas Bergkamp, Rulemaking, Administrative Law of the European Union (New York: ABA Publishing 2008).

¹⁸ Trudy Dehue, Betere mensen: over gezondheid als keuze en koopwaar (Uitgeverij Augustus 2014); Roel Pieterman, “Obesity and Deviance” in Handbook of Deviance (Routledge 2017, forthcoming).

¹⁹ Lucas Bergkamp, “The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: A Risk Regulation Perspective” (2016) 7(1) EJRR 35.

²⁰ Lucas Bergkamp, “Politics and the Changing Norms of Science”, Climate Etc, 25 October 2016, available online at: <https://judithcurry.com/2016/10/25/politics-and-the-changing-norms-of-science/>; Lucas Bergkamp, “Post-Modernism’s Troubled Relationship with Science”, Aero Magazine, 30 November 2016, available online at: <https://areomagazine.com/2016/11/30/post-modernisms-troubled-relationship-with-science/>.

²¹ Lucas Bergkamp, “The problem of the improbable disruptors: four views on the role of science in policy-making” Revista Quaestio Juris, 30 November 2016, available online at: <http://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/quaestioiuris/article/view/25675>.

²² Lucas Bergkamp, “The Rise of the Counter-Norms of Science” Environmental Law & Management 2016 (forthcoming).