Allen, T., Cho, E., & Meier, L. L. (2014). Work–family boundary dynamics. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 99–121. https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413–091330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work-family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345–376. doi:10.1111/peps.12012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonakis, J. & Atwater, L. (2002). Leader distance: A review and a proposed theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 673–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonakis, J. & Jacquart, P. (2013). The far side of leadership: Rather difficult to face. In Bligh, M. C. & Riggio, R. E. (Eds.), Exploring distance in leader-follower relationships (pp. 155–187). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249–269.3.0.CO;2-#>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avolio, B. J., Kahai, S., & Dodge, G. E. (2001). E-leadership: Implications for theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 615–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avolio, B. J. & Kahai, S. S. (2003). Adding the “E” to E-leadership: How it may impact your leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014). E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 105–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bal, P. M., De Jong, S. B., Jansen, P. G. W., & Bakker, A. (2012). Motivating employees to work beyond retirement: A multi-level study of the role of i-deals and unit climate. Journal of Management Studies, 49(2), 306–331. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–6486.2011.01026.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Beehr, T. A. & Bennett, M. M. (2014). Working after retirement: Features of bridge employment and research directions. Work, Aging, and Retirement, 112–128. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/workar/wau007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, B. S. & Kozlowski, S. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27, 14–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, R., Furst, S., & Rosen, B. (2003). Building a winning virtual team: KSAs, training, and evaluation. In Gibson, C. B. & Cohen, S. G. (Eds.), Virtual teams that work (pp. 95–120). San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Bligh, M. C. & Riggio, R. E. (2013). Introduction: When near is far and far is near. In Bligh, M. C. & Riggio, R. E. (Eds.), Exploring distance in leader-follower relationships (pp. 1–9). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bonet, R. & Salvador, F. (2017). When the boss is away: Manager-worker separation and worker performance in a multisite software maintenance organization. Organization Science, 28(2), 244–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogardus, E. S. (1927). Leadership and social distance. Sociology and Social Research, 12, 173–178.Google Scholar

Boring, N. (2017). France: Right to disconnect takes effect. United States Library of Congress: Global Legal Monitor. Retrieved from www.loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/france-right-to-disconnect-takes-effect/.Google Scholar

Burke, C. S., Stagl, K.C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G.F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S.M. (2006). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2017). Labor force statistics from the Current Population Survey. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/cps/demographics.htm.Google Scholar

Butts, M., Becker, W., & Boswell, W. (2015). Hot buttons and time sinks : The effects of electronic communication during nonwork time on emotions and work–nonwork conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 763–788. https://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carte, T. A., Chidambaram, L., & Becker, A. (2006). Emergent leadership in self-managed virtual teams: A longitudinal study of concentrated and shared leadership behaviors. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carter, D. R., Seely, P. W., Dagosta, J., DeChurch, L. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2015). Leadership for global virtual teams: Facilitating teamwork processes. In Wildman, J. L., Griffith, R. L. (Eds.), Leading global teams: Translating multidisciplinary science to practice (pp. 225–252). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cascio, W. F. & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015–062352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Center for Creative Leadership. (2007). What’s next? The 2007 changing nature of leadership survey. Retrieved from www.ccl.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/WhatsNext.pdf.Google Scholar

Chen, C. C., Wu, J., Yang, S. C., & Tsou, H. Y. (2008). Importance of diversified leadership roles in improving team effectiveness in a virtual collaboration learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 11(1), 304–321.Google Scholar

Cogliser, C. C., Gardner, W. L., Gavin, M. B., & Broberg, J. C. (2012). Big five personality factors and leader emergence in virtual teams relationships with team trustworthiness, member performance contributions, and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 37, 752–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, M. S., Bruch, H., & Shamir, B. (2009). Social distance as a moderator of transformational leadership effects: Both a neutralizer and an enhancer. Human Relations, 62, 1697–1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colquitt, J. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., LePine, J. A., & Sheppard, L. (2002). Computer-assisted communication and team decision-making performance: The moderating effect of openness to experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 402–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cordery, J. L. & Soo, C. (2008). Overcoming impediments to virtual team effectiveness. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 18(5), 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 6, pp. 191–233). Homewood, IL: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Day, D. (2012). Leadership. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (pp. 696–729). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deahl, D. (2017). Todoist’s Slack competitor is for people who hate constant notifications. Retrieved from www.theverge.com/2017/6/21/15848640/twist-communications-app-doist-slack-competitorGoogle Scholar

Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dienesch, R. M. & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dulebohn, J. H. & Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 678–693. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenberg, J., Gibbs, J., & Erhardt, N. (2016). The role of vertical and shared leadership in virtual team collaboration. In Graham, C. (Ed.), Strategic management and leadership for systems development in virtual spaces (pp. 22–42). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2005). Work at home/telework as a reasonable accommodation. Retrieved from www.eeoc.gov/facts/telework.html.Google Scholar

Fleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L., & Hein, M. B. (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. The Leadership Quarterly, 2, 245–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furst, S. A., Reeves, M., Rosen, B., & Blackburn, R. S. (2004). Managing the life cycle of virtual teams. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 6–20.Google Scholar

Gajendran, R. S. & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021–9010.92.6.1524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gajendran, R. S. & Joshi, A. (2012). Innovation in globally distributed teams: The role of LMX, communication frequency, and member influence on team decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gibbs, J. L., Sivunen, A., & Boyraz, M. (2017). Investigating the impacts of team type and design on virtual team processes. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 590–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, C. B. & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, C. B., Huang, L., Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2014). Where global and virtual meet: The value of examining the intersection of these elements in twenty-first-century teams. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 217–244. https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413–091240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Young, N. C. J., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golden, T. D. (2006). The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golden, T. D. & Veiga, J. F. (2008). The impact of superior-subordinate relationships on the commitment, job satisfaction, and performance of virtual workers. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graen, G. B. & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Apply a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hambley, L. A., O’Neill, T. A., & Kline, T. J. B. (2007). Virtual team leadership: The effects of leadership style and communication medium on team interaction styles and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardin, A. M., Fuller, M. A., & Davison, R. M. (2007). I know I can, but can we? Culture and efficacy beliefs in global virtual teams. Small Group Research, 38(1), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406297041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hesseldahl, A. (2016). Three million people now use Slack every day. Retrieved from www.recode.net/2016/5/25/11772938/slack-usage-numbers-scale.Google Scholar

Hill, N. S. (2005). Leading together, working together: The role of team shared leadership in building collaborative capital in virtual teams. In Beyerlein, M., Beyerlein, S., & Kennedy, F. (Eds.), Collaborative capital: Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (vol. 11, pp. 183–209). New York, NY: Elsevier JAI.Google Scholar

Hill, N. S. & Bartol, K. M. (2016). Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 159–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill, N. S., Kang, J. H., & Seo, M-G. (2014). The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and electronic communication on employee psychological empowerment and work outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 772–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoch, J. E. & Dulebohn, J. H. (2013). Shared leadership in enterprise resource planning and human resource management system implementation. Human Resource Management Review, 23(1), 114–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoch, J. E. & Dulebohn, J. H. (2017). Team personality composition, emergent leadership and shared leadership in virtual teams: A theoretical framework. Human Resource Management Review, 27, 678–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoch, J. E. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 390–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Howell, J. M. & Hall-Merenda, K. E. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(5), 680–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howell, J. M., Neufeld, D. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2005). Examining the relationship of leadership and physical distance with business unit performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoyt, C. L. & Blascovich, J. (2003). Transformational and transactional leadership in virtual and physical environments. Small Group Research, 34, 678–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huang, R., Kahai, S., & Jestice, R. (2010). The contingent effects of leadership on team collaboration in virtual teams. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1098–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20, 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, T. A. & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kacmar, K. M., Witt, L. A., Zivnuska, S., & Gully, S. M. (2003). The interactive effect of leader-member exchange and communication frequency on performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 764–772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kahai, S. S. (2013). Leading in a digital age: What’s different, issues raised, and what we know. In Bligh, M. C. & Riggio, R. E. (Eds.), Exploring distance in leader-follower relationships (pp. 63–108). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kahai, S. S., Huang, R., & Jestice, R. J. (2012). Interaction effect of leadership and communication media on feedback positivity in virtual teams. Group & Organization Management, 37, 716–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Effects of leadership style, anonymity, and rewards on creativity-relevant processes and outcomes in an electronic meeting system context. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4–5), 499–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahai, S. S., Sosik, J. J., & Avolio, B. J. (2004). Effects of participative and directive leadership in electronic groups. Group & Organization Management, 29, 67–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, D. & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Kelley, E. & Kelloway, E. K. (2012). Context matters: Testing a model of remote leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19 (4), 437–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiesler, S. & Cummings, J. N. (2002). What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In Hinds, P. J. & Kiesler, S. (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 57–80). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerr, S. & Jermier, J. M. (1978). Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkman, B. L., Gibson, C. B., & Kim, K. (2012). Across borders and technologies: Advancements in virtual team research. In Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (pp. 789–859). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkman, B. L. & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kossek, E. & Lautsch, B. A. (2012). Work-family boundary management styles in organizations: A cross-level model. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(2), 152–171. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2041386611436264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kossek, E. E. & Michel, J. S. (2011). Flexible work schedules. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 1, pp. 535–572). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. J. & Bell, B. (2013). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Schmitt, D. N. & Highhouse, S. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 2, pp. 412–469). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lewandowski, J. & Lisk, T. C. (2013). Foundations of distance. In Bligh, M. C. & Riggio, R. E. (Eds.), Exploring distance in Leader-follower relationships (pp. 13–38). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Liao, C. (2017). Leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 648–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lipnack, J. & Stamps, J. (2000). Virtual teams: People working across boundaries with technology (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lord, R. G. (1977). Functional leadership behavior: Measurement and relation to social power and leadership perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Makarius, E. E. & Larson, B. Z. (2017). Changing the perspective of virtual work: Building virtual intelligence at the individual level. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2014.0120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., & Rosen, B. (2007). Leading virtual teams. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mark, G. (2015). Multitasking in the digital age. Synthesis Lectures On Human-Centered Informatics, 8(3), 1–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mark, G., Gonzalez, V. M., & Harris, J. (2005). No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. In CHI 2005: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mark, G., Gudith, D., & Klocke, U. (2008). The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress. In CHI 2008: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mark, G., Iqbal, S., Czerwinski, M., & Johns, P. (2015). Focused, aroused, but so distractible: A temporal perspective on multitasking and communications. In CSCW 2015: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 805–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGrath, J. E. (1962). Leadership behavior: Some requirements for leadership training.[Mimeographed]. Washington, DC: U.S. Civil Service Commission.Google Scholar

Merriman, K. K., Schmidt, S. M., & Dunlap-Hinkler, D. (2007). Profiling virtual employees: The impact of managing virtually. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(1), 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Muethel, M., Gehrlein, S., & Hoegl, M. (2012). Socio-demographic factors and shared leadership behaviors in dispersed team: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 51, 525–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Napier, B. J. & Ferris, G. R. (1993). Distance in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 3 (4), 321–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neufeld, D. J., Wan, Z., & Fang, Y. (2010). Remote leadership, communication effectiveness, and leader performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 19, 227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newport, C. (2016). Deep work: Rules for focused success in a distracted world. New York, NY: Grand Central.Google Scholar

Ocker, R. J., Huang, H., Benbunan-Fich, R., & Hiltz, S. R. (2011). Leadership dynamics in partially distributed teams: An exploratory study of the effects of configuration and distance. Group Decision Negotiation, 20, 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Leary, M. B. & Cummings, J. N. (2007). The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 433–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Leary, M. B. & Mortensen, M. (2010). Go (con)figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 21(1), 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Leary, M. B., Woolley, A. W., & Mortenson, M. (2012). Multiteam membership in relation to multiteam systems. In Zaccaro, S. J., Marks, M. A., & DeChurch, L. (Eds.), Multiteam systems: An organization form for dynamic and complex environments (pp. 141–172). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814772.Google Scholar

O’Neill, T. A., Hambley, L. A., & Chatellier, G. S. (2014). Cyberslacking, engagement, and personality in distributed work environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 40, 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ollier-Malaterre, A. & Foucreault, A. (2016). Cross-national work-life research: Cultural and structural impacts for individuals and organizations. Journal of Management, 20(10), 1–26. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206316655873.Google Scholar

Pearce, C. L. & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearce, C. L. & Sims, H. P., Jr. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6, 172–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearce, C. L., Yoo, Y., & Alavi, M. (2004). Leadership, social work, and virtual teams: The relative influence of vertical versus shared leadership in the nonprofit sector. In Riggio, R. E. & Orr, S. S. (Eds.), Improving leadership in nonprofit organizations. (pp. 180–203). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Piszczek, M. M. & Berg, P. (2014). Expanding the boundaries of boundary theory. Human Relations, 67(12), 1491–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Bommer, W. H. (1996). Meta-analysis of the relationships between Kerr and Jermier’s substitutes for leadership and employee job attitudes, role perceptions, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81 (4), 380–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Polzer, J. T., Crisp, C. B., Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Kim, J. W. (2006). Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams: How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 679–692. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Purvanova, R. K. & Bono, J. E. (2009). Transformational leadership in context: Face-to-face and virtual teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruggieri, S. (2009). Leadership in virtual teams: A comparison of transformational and transactional leaders. Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 37, 1017–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salas, E. Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In Swezey, R. W. & Salas, E. (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 3–29). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Schneider, C. E. & Goktepe, J. R. (1983). Issues in emergent leadership: The contingency model of leadership, leader sex, leader behavior. In Blumberg, H. H., Hare, A. P., Kent, V., & Davies, M. F. (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction (pp. 413–421). Chicester, England: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Schulze, J. & Krumm, S. (2017). The “virtual team player”: A review and initial model of knowledge, skills, and abilities and other characteristics for virtual collaboration. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(1), 66–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386616675522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shamir, B. (1995). Social distance and charisma: Theoretical notes and an exploratory study. The Leadership Quarterly, 6 (1), 19–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shamir, B. (2013). Notes on distance and leadership. In Bligh, M. C. & Riggio, R. E. (Eds.), Exploring distance in Leader-follower relationships (pp. 39–60). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Society for Human Resource Management. (2012). Virtual teams. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/research/surveyfindings/ articles/pages/virtualteams.aspx.Google Scholar

Society for Human Resource Management. (2016a). 2016 employee benefits: Looking back at 20 years of employee benefits offerings in the U.S. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/pages/2016-employee-benefits.aspx.Google Scholar

Society for Human Resource Management. (2016b). SHRM survey findings: 2016 strategic benefits – Flexible work arrangements. Retrieved from www.shrm.org/hr-today/trends-and-forecasting/research-and-surveys/Documents/SHRM-Survey-Findings-Strategic-Benefits-Flexible-Work-Arrangements.pdf.Google Scholar

Sosik, J. J. (1997). Effects of transformational leadership and anonymity on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Group & Organization Management, 22(4), 460–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(1), 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, D. M. & Bostrom, R. P. (2010a). Team leader strategies for enabling collaboration technology adaptation: Team technology knowledge to improve globally distributed systems development work. European Journal of Information Systems, 19, 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, D. M. & Bostrom, R. P. (2010b). Vital signs for virtual teams: An empirically developed trigger model for technology adaptation interventions. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyran, K. L., Tyran, C. K., & Shepherd, M. (2003). Exploring leadership in virtual teams. In Gibson, C. B. & Cohen, S. G. (Eds.), Virtual teams that work (pp. 183–195). SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Venolia, G., Tang, J., Cervantes, R., Bly, S., Robertson, G., Lee, B., & Inkpen, K. (2010). Embodied social proxy: Mediating interpersonal connection in hub-and-satellite teams. In CHI 2010: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

WorldatWork. (2013). Survey on workplace flexibility 2013. Retrieved from www.worldatwork.org/adimLink?id=73898.Google Scholar