Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T21:10:21.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Learning of gestures by imitation in a humanoid robot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2009

By
Sylvain Calinon  and
Aude Billard
Edited by
Chrystopher L. Nehaniv  and
Kerstin Dautenhahn
Sylvain Calinon
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Autonomous Systems Lab, Switzerland
Aude Billard
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL), Autonomous Systems Lab, Switzerland
Chrystopher L. Nehaniv
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
Kerstin Dautenhahn
Affiliation:
University of Hertfordshire
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Traditionally, robotics developed highly specific controllers for the robot to perform a specific set of tasks in highly constrained and deterministic environments. This required the embedding of the controller with an extensive knowledge of the robot's architecture and of its environment. It was soon clear that such an approach would not scale up for controlling robots with multiple degrees of freedom, working in highly variable environments, such as humanoid robots required to interact with humans in their daily environment. The field has now moved to developing more flexible and adaptive control systems, so that the robot would no longer be dedicated to a single task, and could be re-programmed in a fast and efficient manner, to match the end-user needs.

Robot learning by imitation, also referred to as robot programming by demonstration, explores novel means of implicitly teaching a robot new motor skills (Billard and Siegwart, 2004; Dillmann, 2004; Schaal et al., 2003). This field of research takes inspiration in a large and interdisciplinary body of literature on imitation learning, drawing from studies in psychology, ethology and the neurosciences (Demiris and Hayes, 2001; Billard and Hayes, 1999; Alissandrakis et al., 2002). To provide a robot with the ability to imitate is advantageous for at least two reasons: it provides a natural, user-friendly means of implicitly programming the robot; it constrains the search space of motor learning by showing possible and/or optimal solutions.

In this chapter, we explore the issue of recognizing, generalizing and reproducing arbitrary gesture (Billard et al., 2004).

Type
Chapter
Information
Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals
Behavioural, Social and Communicative Dimensions
 , pp. 153 - 178
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alissandrakis, A., Nehaniv, C. L. and Dautenhahn, K. (2002). Imitating with ALICE: learning to imitate corresponding actions across dissimilar embodiments. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 32(4), 482–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengio, S. (2004). Multimodal speech processing using asynchronous hidden Markov models. Information Fusion, 5(2), 81–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billard, A., Epars, Y., Calinon, S., Cheng, G. and Schaal, S. (2004). Discovering optimal imitation strategies. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 47(2–3), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billard, A. and Hayes, G. (1999). Drama, a connectionist architecture for control and learning in autonomous robots. Adaptive Behavior, 7(1), 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billard, A. and Siegwart, R. (2004). Robot learning from demonstration. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 47(2–3), 65–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, R. (1999). Imitation without intentionality: using string parsing to copy the organization of behaviour. Animal Cognition, 2, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calinon, S. and Billard, A. (2004). Stochastic gesture production and recognition model for a humanoid robot. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ Intl Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Sendai, Japan, 2769–74.Google Scholar
Calinon, S., Guenter, F. and Billard, A. (2005). Goal-directed imitation in a humanoid robot. In Proceedings of the IEEE Intl Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Demiris, J. and Hayes, G. (2001). Imitation as a Dual-Route Process Featuring Predictive and Learning Components: A Biologically Plausible Computational Model. In C. L. Nehaniv and K. Dautenhahn (eds.), Imitation in Animals and Artifacts, MIT Press, 327–61.
Dillmann, R. (2004). Teaching and learning of robot tasks via observation of human performance. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 47(2–3), 109–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyes, C. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 253–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. and Ray, E. (2000). What is the significance of imitation in animals?Advances in the Study of Behavior, 29, 215–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inamura, T., Toshima, I. and Nakamura, Y. (2003). Acquiring Motion Elements for Bidirectional Computation of Motion Recognition and Generation. In B. Siciliano and P. Dario (eds.), Experimental Robotics VIII, Springer-Verlag, 372–81.
Jolliffe, I. (1986). Principal Component Analysis. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehaniv, C. L. and Dautenhahn, K. (2000). Of Hummingbirds and Helicopters: An Algebraic Framework for Interdisciplinary Studies of Imitation and Its Applications. In J. Demiris and A. Birk (eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches to Robot Learning. World Scientific Press, 136–61.
Nehaniv, C. L. and Dautenhahn, K. (2001). Like me? – measures of correspondence and imitation. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 32(1–2), 11–51.Google Scholar
Nehaniv, C. L. and Dautenhahn, K. (2002). The Correspondence Problem. In C. L. Nehaniv and K. Dautenhahn (eds.), Imitation in Animals and Artifacts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 41–61.
Rabiner, L. (1989). A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2), 257–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaal, S. (1999). Is imitation learning the route to humanoid robots?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 233–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaal, S., Ijspeert, A. and Billard, A. (2003). Computational approaches to motor learning by imitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 537–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×