Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:49:37.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Reducing Urban Sources of Methane: An Experiment in Industrial Ecology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

R. Socolow
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
C. Andrews
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
F. Berkhout
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
V. Thomas
Affiliation:
Princeton University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Abstract

Methane is a powerful greenhouse-forcing gas, and its main anthropogenic sources arise from leaks in natural gas distribution networks, landfills, and sewage treatment facilities. A new portable device for detecting and monitoring urban methane fluxes is described. Once detected, leaks can often be cheaply prevented, thus reducing costs and reducing urban carbon emissions. The redesign of cities to optimize industrial and domestic carbon metabolisms is suggested.

Reducing greenhouse gas emissions will be a primary task for the field of industrial ecology. Many nations have agreed to the principle of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, especially carbon dioxide emissions related to fossil fuel combustion. The Convention on Climate Change, endorsed by 153 countries at the U.N. Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) in June 1992, requires industrial countries to develop national emission limits and emission inventories for greenhouse gases. Although the document signed at UNCED lacks emissions reduction targets and timetables, it embodies the goal of returning greenhouse gas emissions to ‘earlier levels’ by the turn of the century (Parson et al., 1992). Actions pledged by some industrial countries, principally in Western Europe, have called for either a freeze or a 20% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions by the year 2000 or soon thereafter. In February 1991, the U.S. government proposed that a comprehensive framework for greenhouse gases would be preferable to focusing on carbon dioxide. At present, the entire process of reaching an international consensus is bogged down in a mire of disagreements over goals, targets, timetables, and equity issues (e.g., Collins, 1991).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×