Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Adaptation now
- Part I Adapting to thresholds in physical and ecological systems
- Part II The role of values and culture in adaptation
- Part III Governance, knowledge and technologies for adaptation
- 20 Whether our levers are long enough and the fulcrum strong? Exploring the soft underbelly of adaptation decisions and actions
- 21 Decentralized planning and climate adaptation: toward transparent governance
- 22 Climate adaptation, local institutions and rural livelihoods
- 23 Adaptive governance for a changing coastline: science, policy and publics in search of a sustainable future
- 24 Climate change, international cooperation and adaptation in transboundary water management
- 25 Decentralization: a window of opportunity for successful adaptation to climate change?
- 26 Adapting to climate change in Sámi reindeer herding: the nation-state as problem and solution
- 27 Limits to adaptation: analysing institutional constraints
- 28 Accessing diversification, networks and traditional resource management as adaptations to climate extremes
- 29 Governance limits to effective global financial support for adaptation
- 30 Organizational learning and governance in adaptation in urban development
- 31 Conclusions: Transforming the world
- Index
- References
27 - Limits to adaptation: analysing institutional constraints
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 August 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface
- 1 Adaptation now
- Part I Adapting to thresholds in physical and ecological systems
- Part II The role of values and culture in adaptation
- Part III Governance, knowledge and technologies for adaptation
- 20 Whether our levers are long enough and the fulcrum strong? Exploring the soft underbelly of adaptation decisions and actions
- 21 Decentralized planning and climate adaptation: toward transparent governance
- 22 Climate adaptation, local institutions and rural livelihoods
- 23 Adaptive governance for a changing coastline: science, policy and publics in search of a sustainable future
- 24 Climate change, international cooperation and adaptation in transboundary water management
- 25 Decentralization: a window of opportunity for successful adaptation to climate change?
- 26 Adapting to climate change in Sámi reindeer herding: the nation-state as problem and solution
- 27 Limits to adaptation: analysing institutional constraints
- 28 Accessing diversification, networks and traditional resource management as adaptations to climate extremes
- 29 Governance limits to effective global financial support for adaptation
- 30 Organizational learning and governance in adaptation in urban development
- 31 Conclusions: Transforming the world
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
The academic literature has been biased towards depicting adaptation to climate change as a rational decision-making process, with constraints being mainly available resources and technologies. An ideal rational adaptation process would start by evaluating the problem of climate change (assessing exposure), mapping possible solutions (possible adaptive measures), and, through a cost–benefit approach, the best and most feasible adaptation measure(s) would be decided and simply implemented. Should organisational structure not favour the implementation of measures directed at the goals set, it would be accordingly altered.
Recent studies have focused on institutional barriers and limits to adaptation, however (for example Adger et al., 2007). We share their concern that neglecting institutional constraints may conceal true human limits to adaptation and also narrowly frame the scope of measures that could be taken in order to increase adaptive capacity. Society consists of formal and informal social structures (regulatory factors, values, norms and cognitive limits) influencing choice and behaviour. These factors have still not received the deserved attention in the adaptation literature. After all, resources and technology are of little use if such institutional factors hinder implementation of proper adaptive measures.
In this chapter, we develop an institutional approach and seek to apply it to analyse constraints to adaptive capacity in the national energy system, chosen due to its vital role as a hub linking together other societal systems and functions. Human life, welfare and security in modern societies are highly dependent on stable supply of energy.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Adapting to Climate ChangeThresholds, Values, Governance, pp. 433 - 447Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
, , , , , , , and 2007. ‘Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity’, in , , , and (eds.) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 717–743.Google Scholar
and 1978. Organisational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
and 1991. ‘Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation’, Organization Science 2: 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2003. The Organisation of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Action in Organisations. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
and 1997. ‘Diversity creation and technological systems: a technology policy perspective’, in (ed.) Systems of Innovation, Technologies, Institutions and Organizations. London: Pinter, pp. 266–294.Google Scholar
and 1991. ‘On the nature, function, and composition of technological systems’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1: 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1999. Structure, Culture, and Governance: a Comparison of Norway and the United States. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
. 2003. Undergrounding of Electricity Lines in Europe. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
and 1983. ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields’, American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.). 2007. Utviklingen av naturulykker som følge av klimaendringer: Utredning på oppdrag fra Statens Landbruksforvaltning, CICERO Report No. 2007:03. Oslo: CICERO.
, and 2001. En sårbar kraftforsyning – Sluttrapport etter BAS3. FFI/Rapport-2001/02381. Kjeller: Forsvarets Forskningsinstitutt.Google Scholar
and 2006. Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
and 1985. The Vaiont Slide. US Corps of Engineers Technical Report No. GL-85–8. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
2001. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of the Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1988. ‘Sovereignty: an institutional perspective’, Comparative Political Studies 21: 66–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1991. ‘Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning’, Organization Science 2: 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
and 1999. ‘Institutional perspectives on political institutions’, in (ed.) The Pursuit of Organizational Intelligence. Malden: Blackwell, pp. 52–72.Google Scholar
1987. Segmentering, institusjonelt etterslep og industriell omstilling: Norsk kraftutbyggings politiske økonomi gjennom 1970- og 1980-årene (Segmentation, institutional inertia and industrial transformation: the political economy of Norwegian electrical power development in the 1970s and 80s). Uppsala: Philosophical Department, University of Uppsala.Google Scholar
and 2006. Statens kraft 1965–2006: Miljø og marked, vol. 3. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
2005. Connecting Reason to Power: Assessments, Learning, and Environmental Policy Integration in Swedish Policy. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute.Google Scholar
. 2006. Endringer i det globale klimaet og norsk vannkraft. Norges Vassdrags- og Energidirektorat (NVE). Available at www.nve.no/modules/module_111/news_item_view.asp?iNewsId=28671&iCategoryId=1523 (accessed 27 March 2008)
, , and 2005. ‘Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway’, Global Environmental Change 15: 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 2000. Kraftmarkedets føringer for sårbarheten i norsk kraftforsyning, FFI/Rapport-2000/03451/Kjeller: Forsvarets Forskningsinstitutt.Google Scholar
1988. ‘An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy oriented learning therein’, Policy Sciences 21: 129–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1983. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1976. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. Kraftsystemutredning for sentralnettet 2005–2020, revidert. Oslo: Statnett SF.Google Scholar
1999. ‘Historical institutionalism in comparative politics’, Annual Review of Political Science 2: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and 2002. ‘Indicators for social and economic coping capacity: moving towards a working definition of adaptive capacity’, Global Environmental Change 12: 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991. ‘Learning by doing and the dynamic effects of international trade’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 369–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987. ‘Institutional theories of organization’, Annual Review of Sociology 13: 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11
- Cited by