Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:40:03.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - When is a landscape perspective important?

from PART I - Introductory perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2009

Lenore Fahrig
Affiliation:
Ottawa–Carleton Institute of Biology Carleton University Canada
John A. Wiens
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Washington DC
Michael R. Moss
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Ontario
Get access

Summary

What is landscape ecology?

Although the definition of landscape ecology has been dealt with extensively (some would say ad nauseam) in the landscape ecological literature, there remains confusion among other ecologists as to exactly what landscape ecology is and, particularly, what its unique contribution is to ecology as a whole.

Ecology is the study of the interrelationships between organisms and their environment (Ricklefs, 1979). The goal of ecological research is to understand how the environment, including biotic and abiotic patterns and processes, affects the abundance and distribution of organisms (Fig. 1.1). This includes indirect effects such as the effect of an abiotic process (e.g., fire) on a biotic process (e.g., germination), which in turn affects the abundance and/or distribution of an organism. Processes considered are typically at a “local” scale, that is, at the same scale or smaller than the scale of the abundance/distribution pattern of interest.

Landscape ecology, a subdiscipline of ecology, is the study of how landscape structure affects the abundance and distribution of organisms (Fig. 1.2). Landscape ecology has also been defined as the study of the effect of pattern on process (Turner, 1989), where “pattern” refers specifically to landscape structure. The full definition of landscape ecology is, then, the study of how landscape structure affects (the processes that determine) the abundance and distribution of organisms. In statistical parlance, the “response” variables in landscape ecology are abundance/distribution/process variables, and the “predictors” are variables that describe landscape structure.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brennan, J. M., Bender, D. J., Contreras, T. A., and Fahrig, L. (2002). Focal patch landscape studies for wildlife management: optimizing sampling effort across scales. In Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management, ed. Liu, J. and Taylor, W. W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahrig, L. (1992). Relative importance of spatial and temporal scales in a patchy environment. Theoretical Population Biology, 41, 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahrig, L. (1998). When does fragmentation of breeding habitat affect population survival?Ecological Modelling, 105, 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragementation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Sysrematics, 34, 487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, C. S. and Houlahan, J. (1997). Anthropogenic correlates of species richness in southeastern Ontario wetlands. Conservation Biology, 11, 1000–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flather, C. H. and Bevers, M. (2002). Patchy reaction-diffusion and population abundance: The relative importance of habitat amount and arrangementAmerican Naturalist, 159, 40–56.Google ScholarPubMed
McGarigal, K. and Cushman, S. A. (2002). Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecological Applications, 12, 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarigal, K. and McComb, W. C. (1995). Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon coast range. Ecological Monographs, 65, 235–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S. E., Fahrig, L., and Merriam, H. G. (2000). Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations. Ecology, 81, 2498–2508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. (1979). Ecology. New York, NY: Chiron Press.Google Scholar
Trzcinski, M. K., Fahrig, L., and Merriam, G. (1999). Independent effects of forest cover and fragmentation on the distribution of forest breeding birds. Ecological Applications, 9, 586–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, M. G. (1989). Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×