Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T17:03:30.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2009

Jeffrey T. Checkel
Affiliation:
Professor of Political Science, University of Oslo; Research Associate, Centre for the Study of Civil War, International Peace Research Institute, Oslo
Jeffrey T. Checkel
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Get access

Summary

Is Europe different? For many theorists, policy analysts, and politicians, the answer is obvious: “Of course!” Europe's degree of integration, level of political community, and pooling of sovereignty far outstrip those seen anywhere else. If there is any place in the world where the nation-state would seem to be in retreat, it is in Europe. Moreover, recent years have witnessed a seeming acceleration of the continent's “specialness.” A common currency has been successfully introduced, a constitutional convention held, and a (supranational) constitution is now being discussed and debated. This all looks and sounds more like federalism and supranational polity building than the anarchy and Westphalian system that have so fascinated theorists of international politics over the centuries.

As with many headline stories, this one, which emphasizes Europe's sui generis nature, is overstated. Yet, as most would admit, there is something to it; Europe is different. Contributors to this volume do not so much disagree with this claim as approach it from a different angle. Leaving the scripting of headlines to others, we are—to continue the journalism metaphor—the investigative reporters, working down in the trenches, exploring the how and why.

Europe is thus our laboratory for getting at some bigger issues concerning the relation of institutions, states, and individuals. When do international institutions create senses of community and belonging? If and when this happens, what does it mean for individual and state allegiances, interests, and identities? What processes underlie such transformative dynamics?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, Amitav, and Alastair Iain Johnston. 2007. Crafting Cooperation: The Design and Effect of Regional Institutions in Comparative Perspective. In (Regional International Institution in Global Politics), edited by Acharya, Amitav and Johnston, Alastair Iain, chapter 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 1997. Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations 3 (3):319–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2002. Constructivism and International Relations. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth, 95–118. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Barnett, Michael, eds. 1998. Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderson, Kai. 2001. Making Sense of State Socialization. Review of International Studies 27 (3):415–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banchoff, Thomas. 1999. German Identity and European Integration. European Journal of International Relations 5 (3):259–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 1993. Institutions, Roles and Disorder: The Case of the Arab States System. International Studies Quarterly 37 (3):271–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 1999. The Politics, Power and Pathologies of International Organizations. International Organization 53 (4):699–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Finnemore, Martha. 2004. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cor nell University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and George, Alexander. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bernauer, Thomas, and Mitchell, Ronald. 1998. Empirical Research on International Environmental Policy: Designing Qualitative Case Studies. Journal of Environment and Development 1 (1):4–31.Google Scholar
Beyers, Jan. 1998. Where Does Supranationalism Come from? The Ideas Floating through the Working Groups of the Council of the European Union. Paper Presented at the Third Pan-European Conference on International Relations, September, Vienna.
Beyers, Jan, and Dierickx, Guido. 1997. Nationality and European Negotiations: The Working Groups of the Council of Ministers. European Journal of International Relations 3 (4):435–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, Jan, and Dierickx, Guido. 1998. The Working Groups of the Council of the European Union: Supranational or Intergovernmental Negotiations?Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (3):289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Richard, Mutz, Diana, and Sniderman, Paul, eds. 1996. Political Persuasion and Attitude Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caporaso, James. 1998. Regional Integration Theory: Understanding Our Past and Anticipating Our Future. Journal of European Public Policy 5 (1):1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caporaso, James, and Jupille, Joseph. 1999. Institutionalism and the European Union: Beyond International Relations and Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 2:429–44.Google Scholar
Caporaso, James, Checkel, Jeffrey T., and Jupille, Joseph, eds. 2003a. Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism and the Study of the European Union. Special issue of Comparative Political Studies 36 (l–2):5–231.Google Scholar
Caporaso, James, Checkel, Jeffrey T., and Jupille, Joseph. 2003b. Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism and the Study of the European Union—Introduction. Comparative Political Studies 36 (1–2):7–41.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler. 1995. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 2000a. Compliance and Conditionality. Working Paper Series 00/18. Oslo, Norway: ARENA Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo.
Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2000b. Review of The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Comparative Political Studies 33 (10):1337–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2001. Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change. International Organization 55 (3):553–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2003. ‘Going Native’ in Europe? Theorizing Social Interaction in European Institutions. Comparative Political Studies 36 (1–2):209–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2004. Social Constructivisms in Global and European Politics. A Review Essay. Review of International Studies 30 (2):229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T., and Moravcsik, Andrew. 2001. A Constructivist Research Program in EU Studies? (Forum Debate). European Union Politics 2 (2):219–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Richard, and Prewitt, Kenneth. 1969. Political Socialization. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Egeberg, Morten. 1999. Transcending Intergovernmentalism? Identity and Role Perceptions of National Officials in EU Decision-Making. Journal of European Public Policy 6 (3):456–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egeberg, Morten. 2004. An Organizational Approach to European Integration: Outline of a Complementary Perspective. European Journal of Political Research 43 (2):199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon, ed. 1998. Deliberative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Henry, and Flynn, Gregory. 1999. Piecing Together the Democratic Peace: The CSCE and the ‘Construction’ of Security in Post–Cold War Europe. International Organization 53 (3): 505–36.Google Scholar
Fearon, James. 1998. Deliberation as Discussion. In Deliberative Democracy, edited by Elster, Jon, 44–68. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James, and Alexander Wendt. 2002. Rationalism v. Constructivism: A Skeptical View. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth, 52–72. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (3):887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabbe, Heather. 1999. A Partnership for Accession? The Implications of EU Conditionality for the Central and East European Applicants. Robert Schuman Centre Working Paper 99/12. Florence, Italy: European University Institute.
Grabbe, Heather. 2001. How Does Europeanization Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion and Diversity. Journal of European Public Policy 8 (6):1013–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst. 1990. “When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hedstroem, Peter, and Swedberg, Richard, eds. 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmer, Christopher, and Katzenstein, Peter. 2002. Why Is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism and the Origins of Multilateralism. International Organization 56 (2):575–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet. 1999. Supranational Activists or Intergovernmental Agents? Explaining the Orientations of Senior Commission Officials Toward European Integration. Comparative Political Studies 32 (4):435–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet. 2001a. Top Commission Officials on Capitalism: An Institutionalist Understanding of Preferences. In The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe, edited by Aspinwall, Mark and Schneider, Gerald, 152–73. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet. 2001b. The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hovi, Jon. 2004. Causal Mechanisms and the Study of International Environmental Regimes. In Regime Consequences: Methodological Challenges and Research Strategies, edited by Underdal, Arild and Young, Oran, 71–86. Boston: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 1999. Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics. International Organization 53 (2):379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John, and Kupchan, Charles. 1990. Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization 44 (3):283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, Christian, and Neyer, Juergen. 1997a. From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology. European Law Journal 3 (3):273–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, Christian, and Neyer, Juergen. 1997b. Transforming Strategic Interaction into Deliberative Problem-Solving: European Comitology in the Foodstuffs Sector. Journal of European Public Policy 4 (4):609–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, James. 2002. How Conceptual Problems Migrate: Rational Choice, Interpretation and the Hazards of Pluralism. Annual Review of Political Science 5:223–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. 2001. Treating International Institutions as Social Environments. International Studies Quarterly 45 (4):487–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain. Forthcoming. Social States: China in International Institutions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, ed. 1997. Tamed Power: Germany in Europe. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter, Keohane, Robert, and Krasner, Stephen, eds. 1998. International Organization at Fifty: Exploration and Contestation in the Study of World Politics. International Organization 52 (3):645–1061.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2004. Ethnic Politics in Europe: The Power of Norms and Incentives. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, King, Gary, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert, Nye, Joseph, and Hoffmann, Stanley, eds. 1993. After the Cold War: International Institutions and State Strategies in Europe, 1989–1991. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kopstein, Jeffrey, and Reilly, David. 2000. Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Post-communist World. World Politics 53 (l):1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffan, Brigid. 1998. The European Union: A Distinctive Model of Internationalization. Journal of European Public Policy 5 (2):235–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned. 2001. Thucydides the Constructivist. American Political Science Review 95 (3):547–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepgold, Joseph, and Lamborn, Alan. 2001. Locating Bridges: Connecting Research Agendas on Cognition and Strategic Choice. International Studies Review 3 (3):3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey. 1998. Is the ‘Hard Bargaining’ Image of the Council Misleading? The Committee of Permanent Representatives and the Local Elections Directive. Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (4):479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, Marc. 1999. State Interests and Public Spheres: The International Politics of Jordan's Identity. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Marc. 2002. Why Engage? China and the Logic of Communicative Engagement. European Journal of International Relations 8 (2): 187–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, James, and Johan P. Olsen. Forthcoming. The Logic of Appropriateness. In Handbook of Public Policy, edited by Goodin, Robert, Moran, Michael and Rein, Martin. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
March, James, and Herbert Simon. 1981. Decision-Making Theory. In The Sociology of Organizations. Basic Studies, 2d ed., edited by Grusky, O. and Miller, G. A.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa, and Simmons, Beth. 1998. Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions. International Organization 52 (3):729–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayntz, Renate. 2003. Mechanisms in the Analysis of Macro-Social Phenomena. MPIfG Working Paper 03/3. Cologne, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
Merton, Robert. 1968 [1949]. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, John, and Strang, David. 1993. Institutional Conditions for Diffusion. Theory and Society 22:487–511.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 1995. Explaining International Human Rights Regimes: Liberal Theory and Western Europe. European Journal of International Relations 1 (2):157–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe. International Organization 54 (2):217–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2001. Constructivism and European Integration: A Critique. In The Social Construction of Europe, edited by Christiansen, Thomas, Joergensen, Knud Erik, and Wiener, Antje, 176–88. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Odell, John. 2000. Negotiating the World Economy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Olsen, Johan P. 2001. Garbage Cans, New Institutionalism and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 95 (l):191–98.Google Scholar
Olsen, Johan P.. 2002. The Many Faces of Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (5):921–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbell, John, Dawes, Robyn and Kragt, Alphons. 1988. Explaining Discussion-Induced Cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54 (5):811–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon. 2002. Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization. International Organization 56 (3):515–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, Mark. 1998. Constructivism, Social Psychology and Elite Attitude Change: Lessons from an Exhausted Research Program. Paper Presented at the llth International Conference of Europeanists, February, Baltimore.
Pollack, Mark. 2003. Deliberative Democracy or Member-State Control Mechanism? Two Images of Comitology. Comparative Political Studies 36 (l–2):125–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard. 1998. Reversing the Gun Sights: Transnational Civil Society Targets Land Mines. International Organization 52 (3):613–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. ‘Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1):1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen, and Sikkink, Kathryn, eds. 1999. The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas. 1995a. Cooperation among Democracies: The European Influence on US Foreign Policy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Risse-Kappen, Thomas, ed. 1995b. Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge. International Organization 52 (4):855–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2003. The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe: Rules and Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank, and Sedelmeier, Ulrich. 2002. Theorizing EU Enlargement: Research Focus, Hypotheses and the State of Research. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (4):500–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, R. 1965. Assumptions about the Learning of Political Values. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 361.Google Scholar
Smith, Michael. 2004. Institutionalization, Policy Adaptation and European Foreign Policy Cooperation. European Journal of International Relations 10 (1):95–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 2002. Anarchy and Culture: Insights from the Anthropology of War. International Organization 56 (1):7–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sterling-Folker, Jennifer. 2000. Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neo-liberal Institutionalism Compared. International Studies Quarterly 44 (1):97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon. 1980. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Perspective. Reading, Mass.: Benjamin-Cummings.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas. 2002. Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management and the European Union. International Organization 56 (3):609–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 2001. Mechanisms in Political Processes. Annual Review of Political Science 4:21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallander, Celeste. 1999. Mortal Friends, Best Enemies: German-Russian Cooperation after the Cold War. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wallander, Celeste. 2000a. What NATO Is and How It Can Cooperate with Russia. Policy Memo, No. 127. Washington, D.C.: Program on New Approaches to Russian Security, Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Wallander, Celeste. 2000b. Institutional Assets and Adaptability: NATO after the Cold War. International Organization 54 (4):705–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Weber, Steven. 1994. Origins of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. International Organization 48 (l):1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 2001. Driving with the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design. International Organization 55 (4):1019–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessels, Wolfgang. 1998. Comitology: Fusion in Action—Politico-Administrative Trends in the EU System. Journal of European Public Policy 5 (2):209–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Colin. 2002. Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations. In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth, 23–51. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, Philip, and Leippe, Michael. 1991. The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×