Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:31:23.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Individual-based modeling as a tool for conserving connectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 May 2010

Kevin R. Crooks
Affiliation:
Colorado State University
M. Sanjayan
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy, Virginia
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Animal movement

Functional (or behavioral) connectivity has been defined as “the degree to which the landscape facilitates or impedes movement among resource patches” (Taylor et al. 1993; Forman 1997; Taylor et al. Chapter. 2). When an animal moves, it must expend energy and it may take risks such as being more visible to predators. So why should an animal move at all? The reason is that the landscape in immediate proximity to an animal may not satisfy its present or anticipated needs. Therefore, we would expect movement to have some purpose for animals; in other words, it is a goal-oriented and behavior-mediated search. Bell (1990) suggests three factors that determine searching behavior: the characteristics and abilities of the animal, the resources and risks in the external environment, and resource requirements as determined by the internal state of the animal. We could think of movement as an activity that allows an animal to match its internal needs to its external environment: if it is threatened it finds safety, if it is hungry it finds food, if it is cold it finds warmth, and if it is ready to reproduce it finds a mate. An animal, however, must weigh all of these needs simultaneously each time it moves based on which needs are most important and what it knows about the landscape. An ordered set of these decisions, which results in a movement path, determines in large part the success of the individual.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beier, P. 1993. Determining minimum habitat areas and habitat corridors for cougars. Conservation Biology 7:94–108Google Scholar
Beier, P. 1995. Dispersal of juvenile cougars in fragmented habitat. Journal of Wildlife Management 59:228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beier, P., and Barrett, R. H.. 1993. The Cougar in the Santa Ana Mountain Range, California, Final Report. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Fish and Game.Google Scholar
Beier, P., Choate, D., and Barrett, R. H.. 1995. Movement patterns of mountain lions during different behaviors. Journal of Mammalogy 76:1056–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, W. J. 1990. Searching Behavior. New York: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhamou, S., and Bovet, P.. 1992. Distinguishing between elementary orientation mechanisms by means of path analysis. Animal Behavior 43:371–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooks, K. R. 2000. Mammalian carnivores as target species for conservation in southern California. Pp. 105–112 in Keeley, J. E., Baer-Keeley, M., and Fotheringham, C. J. (eds.) Second Interface between Ecology and Land Development in California, Open-File Report 00-62. Sacramento, CA: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
Crooks, K. R. 2002. Relative sensitivities of mammalian carnivores to habitat fragmentation. Conservation Biology 16:488–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A. P., Rodriguez, J. P., Roberts, W. M., and Wilcove, D. S.. 1997. Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275:550–553CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forman, R. T. T. 1997. Land Mosaics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gustafson, E. J., and Gardner, R. H.. 1996. The effect of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. Ecology 77:94–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddad, N. M. 1999. Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. American Naturalist 153:215–227CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, R., Fisher, R., and Crooks, K.. 2003. Landscape-level connectivity in coastal southern California as assessed by carnivore habitat suitability. Natural Areas Journal 23:302–314Google Scholar
Huston, M., DeAngelis, D., and Post, W.. 1988. New computer models unify ecological theory. BioScience 38:682–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jander, R. 1975. Ecological aspects of spatial orientation. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 6:171–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lima, S. L., and Zollner, P. A.. 1996. Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:131–135CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, L. M., and Jones, R. E.. 1988. The form and consequences of random walk models. Journal of Theoretical Biology 133:113–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, G., and Peel, D.. 2000. Finite Mixture Model. New York: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, N. 1990. The biodiversity challenge: expanded hot-spots analysis. Environmentalist 10:243–256CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olden, J. D., Schooley, R. L., Monroe, J. B., and Poff, N. L.. 2004. Context-dependent perceptual ranges and their relevance to animal movements in landscapes. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:1190–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2004. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online at http://www.r-project.org/Google Scholar
Soulé, M. E. 1991. Land use planning and wildlife maintenance: guidelines for conserving wildlife in an urban landscape. Journal of the American Planning Association 57:313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., and Merriam, G.. 1993. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68:571–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracey, J. A., and Crooks, K. R.. 2004. Evaluating Landscape Connectivity in Coastal Southern California using Individual-Based Movement Models, Final Report. San Diego, CA: The Nature Conservancy and the California Department of Fish and Game.Google Scholar
Tracey, J. A., Zhu, J., and Crooks, K. R.. 2005. A set of nonlinear regression models for animal movement in response to a single landscape feature. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 10:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turchin, P. 1998. Quantitative Analysis of Movement. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Van Vuren, D. 1998. Mammalian dispersal and reserve design. Pp. 369393 in Caro, T. (ed.) Behavioral Ecology and Conservation Biology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Zollner, P. A. 2000. Comparing the landscape level perceptual abilities of forest sciurids in fragmented agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology 15:523–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×