Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Miler, Kristina C.
2009.
The Limitations of Heuristics for Political Elites.
Political Psychology,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 6,
p.
863.
Klepetar, Dillon
2012.
The Electoral Encounter: Legislative Responsiveness to Challenger Campaign Issues in the U.S. House.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Peoples, Clayton D.
2013.
Campaign Finance and Policymaking: PACs, Campaign Contributions, and Interest Group Influence in Congress.
Sociology Compass,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 11,
p.
900.
Broockman, David E.
2014.
Distorted Communication, Unequal Representation: Constituents Communicate Less to Representatives Not of Their Race.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 2,
p.
307.
Karol, David
2015.
American Gridlock.
p.
68.
Christenson, Dino
and
Makse, Todd
2015.
Mass Preferences on Shared Representation and the Composition of Legislative Districts.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 3,
p.
451.
Naurin, Elin
2016.
Do They Really Know? On Party Representatives’ Knowledge of the Extent to Which Their Parties Make Election Pledges.
Scandinavian Political Studies,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 4,
p.
388.
Kalla, Joshua L.
and
Broockman, David E.
2016.
Campaign Contributions Facilitate Access to Congressional Officials: A Randomized Field Experiment.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 3,
p.
545.
Buzogány, Aron
2016.
Wer hat Angst vor Abgeordnetenwatch? Repräsentation, Responsitivität und Transparenzforderungen an Abgeordnete des Deutschen Bundestages.
Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft,
Vol. 10,
Issue. S2,
p.
67.
Broockman, David E.
and
Ryan, Timothy J.
2016.
Preaching to the Choir: Americans Prefer Communicating to Copartisan Elected Officials.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 4,
p.
1093.
Harden, Jeffrey J.
and
Kirkland, Justin H.
2016.
Do Campaign Donors Influence Polarization? Evidence from Public Financing in the American States.
Legislative Studies Quarterly,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 1,
p.
119.
Buzogány, Aron
2016.
Web 2.0 – Demokratie 3.0.
p.
67.
Esaiasson, Peter
and
Wlezien, Christopher
2017.
Advances in the Study of Democratic Responsiveness: An Introduction.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 6,
p.
699.
Broockman, David E.
and
Skovron, Christopher
2017.
Conservative Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion Among American Political Elites.
SSRN Electronic Journal ,
Esaiasson, Peter
Gilljam, Mikael
and
Persson, Mikael
2017.
Responsiveness Beyond Policy Satisfaction: Does It Matter to Citizens?.
Comparative Political Studies,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 6,
p.
739.
Karol, David
and
Thurston, Chloe
2017.
From Personal to Partisan: Abortion, Party and Religion in the California State Assembly, 1967-1996.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Cluverius, John
2017.
How the Flattened Costs of Grassroots Lobbying Affect Legislator Responsiveness.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 70,
Issue. 2,
p.
279.
Adler, E. Scott
Cayton, Adam F.
and
Griffin, John D.
2018.
Representation When Constituent Opinion and District Conditions Collide.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 71,
Issue. 3,
p.
681.
BROOCKMAN, DAVID E.
and
SKOVRON, CHRISTOPHER
2018.
Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elites.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 112,
Issue. 3,
p.
542.
Leighley, Jan E.
and
Oser, Jennifer
2018.
Representation in an Era of Political and Economic Inequality: How and When Citizen Engagement Matters.
Perspectives on Politics,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 2,
p.
328.