Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:01:00.054Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Vygotsky's Doctrine of Scientific Concepts

Its Role for Contemporary Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Yuriy V. Karpov
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Education and Psychology, Touro College, New York, New York
Alex Kozulin
Affiliation:
International Center for the Enhancement of Learning Potential, Jerusalem
Boris Gindis
Affiliation:
Touro College, New York
Vladimir S. Ageyev
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Suzanne M. Miller
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Get access

Summary

Vygotsky's doctrine of scientific concepts as the content of school instruction is a direct elaboration of his general theoretical view of mediated learning as the major determinant of human development (see Kozulin, this volume). According to Vygotsky (1978, 1981, 1986), all specifically human mental processes (so-called higher mental processes) are mediated by psychological tools such as language, signs, and symbols. These tools are invented by human society, and they are acquired by children in the course of interpersonal communication with adults and more experienced peers. Having been acquired and internalized by children, these tools then function as mediators of the children's high mental processes.

Vygotsky viewed school instruction as the major avenue for mediated learning and, therefore, as the major contributor to children's development during the period of middle childhood. He emphasized, however, that such a development-generating effect of instruction would take place only if the process of instruction were organized in the proper way: “The only good kind of instruction is that which marches ahead of development and leads it; it must be aimed not so much at the ripe as at the ripening functions” (Vygotsky, 1986, p. 188). According to Vygotsky (1978, 1986), the major reason for the development-generating effect of properly organized school instruction relates to students' acquisition of “scientific concepts,” which can be contrasted with “spontaneous concepts” of preschoolers.

Spontaneous concepts are the result of generalization of everyday personal experience in the absence of systematic instruction. Therefore, such concepts are unsystematic, not conscious, and often wrong.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aidarova, L. I. (1978). Psikhologicheskie problemy obucheniya mladshikh shkolnikov russkomu yazyku [Psychological problems of teaching Russian language to elementary-school pupils]. Moscow: Prosveschenie
Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1995). Applications and misapplications of cognitive psychology to mathematics education. Available at: http://www.psy.cmu.edu/∼mm4b/misapplied.html
Arievitch, I. M., & Stetsenko, A. (2000). The quality of cultural tools and cognitive development: Gal'perin*s perspective and its implications. Human Development, 43, 69–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassok, M., & Holyoak, K. J. (1993). Pragmatic knowledge and conceptual structure: Determinants of transfer between quantitativedomains. In D. K. Detterman &R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 68–98). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Biederman, I., & Shiffrar, M. (1987). Sexing day-old chicks: A case study and expert systems analysis of a difficult perceptual learning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 640–645Google Scholar
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1990). Communities of learning and thinking: Or a context by any other name. Contributions to Human Development, 21, 108–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., Reeve, R. A., Ferrara, R. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (1991). Interactive learning and individual understanding: The case of reading andmathematics. In L. T. Landsman (Ed.), Culture, schooling, and psychological development (pp. 136–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Bruer, J. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Some elements ofdiscovery. In L. S. Shulman &E. R. Keislar (Eds.), Learning by discovery: A critical appraisal (pp. 101–113). Chicago: Rand McNally
Chang-Wells, G. L. M., & Wells, G. (1993). Dynamics of discourse: Literacy and the construction of knowledge. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, &C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children*s development (pp. 58–90). New York: Oxford University Press
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroompractice. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, &C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children*s development (pp. 91–120). New York: Oxford University Press
Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatti, B., & Perlwitz, M.Assessment of a problem-centered second grade mathematics project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 3–29CrossRef
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 2–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2–10CrossRef
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 65–80CrossRef
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1994). From visual word problems to learning communities: Changing conceptions of cognitive research. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 157–200). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Davydov, V. V. (1986). Problemy razvivayuschego obucheniya [Problems of development-generating learning]. Moscow: Pedagogika
Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics
Detterman, D. K. (1993). The case for the prosecution: Transfer as anepiphenomenon. In D. K. Detterman &R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, Cognition, and Instruction (pp. 1–24). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Dewey, J. (1902). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
DiSessa, A. A. (1982). Unlearning Aristotelian physics: A study of knowledge-based learning. Cognitive Science, 6, 37–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkonin, D. B. (1976). Kak uchit detei chitat [How to teach children to read]. Moscow: Znanie
Elkonin, D. B. (1989). Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy [Selected psychological works]. Moscow: Pedagogika
Elkonin, D. B., & Davydov, V. V. (Eds.) (1966). Vozrastnye vozmozhnosti usvoeniya znanii [Age-dependent potentialities of acquiring knowledge]. Moscow: Prosveschenie
Gagné, R. M. (1966). Varieties of learning and the concept ofdiscovery. In L. S. Shulman &E. R. Keislar (Eds.), Learning by discovery: A critical appraisal (pp. 135–150). Chicago: Rand McNally
Galperin, P. Y. (1957). Umstvennoe deistviye kak osnova formirovaniya mysli i obraza [Mental act as the basis for formation of thought and image]. Voprosy Psikhologii, 6, 58–69Google Scholar
Galperin, P. Y. (1969). Stages in the development of mental acts. In M. Cole & I. Maltzman (Eds.), A handbook of contemporary Soviet psychology (pp. 34–61). New York: Basic Books
Galperin, P. Y. (Ed.) (1977). Upravlyaemoe formirovanie psikhicheskikh protsessov [Guided formation of the mental processes]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU
Galperin, P. Y. (1985). Metody obucheniya i umstvennoe razvitie rebenka [Methods of instruction and the child*s mental development]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU
Galperin, P. Y., & Talyzina, N. F. (1961). Formation of elementary geometrical concepts and their dependence on directed participation by the pupils. In N. O'Connor (Ed.), Recent Soviet psychology (pp. 247–272). New York: LiverightCrossRef
Galperin, P. Y., & Talyzina, N. F. (Eds.) (1972). Upravlenie poznavatelnoi deyatelnostyu uchaschikhsya [Guidance of cognitive activity of students].Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU
Kozulin, A. (1995). The learning process: Vygotsky*s theory in the mirror of its interpretations. School Psychology International, 16, 117–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontiev, A. N. (1983). Ovladenie uchaschimisya nauchnymi poniatiyami kak problema pedagogicheskoi psikhologii [Mastering scientific concepts by students as a problem of educational psychology]. In A. N. Leontiev, Izbrannye psikhologicheskie proizvedeniya (Tom 1, pp. 324–347). Moscow: Pedagogika
Morine, H., & Morine, G. (1973). Discovery: A challenge to teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Panofsky, C. P., John-Steiner, V., & Blackwell, P. J. (1992). The development of scientific concepts anddiscourse. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications of sociohistorical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Pantina, N. S. (1957). Formirovanie dvigatelnogo navyka pisma v zavisimosti ot tipa orientirovki v zadanii [Formation of writing skills depending on the type of task orientation]. Voprosy Psikhologii, 4, 117–132Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1970). Genetic epistemology. New York: Columbia University Press
Prawat, R. S. (1995). Misreading Dewey: Reform, projects, and the language game. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmina, N. G., & Sokhina, V. P. (1975). Obuchenie matematike v nachalnoi shkole [Teaching mathematics in elementary school]. Moscow: Pedagogika
Schmittau, J. (1993). Vygotskian scientific concepts: Implications for mathematics education. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 15(2, 3), 29–39Google Scholar
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making inmathematics. In P. H. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 334–370). New York: MacMillan
Shulman, L. S., & Keislar, E. R. (Eds.) (1966). Learning by discovery: A critical appraisal. Chicago: Rand McNally
Talyzina, N. F. (1981). The psychology of learning. Moscow: Progress
Tudge, J. (1992). Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development, and peer collaboration: Implications for classroompractice. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 155–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Venger, L. A. (Ed.) (1986). Razvitie poznavatelnykh sposobnostei v protsesse doshkolnogo vospitaniya [Development of cognitive abilities in the course of preschool education]. Moscow: Pedagogika
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mentalfunctions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987).R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology. New York: Plenum
Wells, G., Chang, G. L., & Maher, A. (1990). Creating classroom communities of literate thinkers. In S. Sharan (Ed.), Cooperative learning: Theory and research (pp. 95–121). New York: Praeger
Zaporozhets, A. V. (1986). Razvitie myshleniya [The development of thinking]. In A. V. Zaporozhets, Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy, Tom 1 (pp. 200–215). Moscow: Pedagogika
Zhurova, L. E. (1978). Obuchenie gramote v detskom sadu [Teaching reading and writing at the kindergarten]. Moscow: Pedagogika

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×