Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T23:14:42.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Ruling against Rules*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Adam Przeworski
Affiliation:
New York University
Tom Ginsburg
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Alberto Simpser
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access

Summary

The Polish Constitution of 1952 appears in all substantive aspects to be a constitution of democracy. Most importantly, it does not contain the clause giving the communist party “the leading role in the state,” a clause standard in communist constitutions, beginning with the Soviet one of 1936. This fact is puzzling because Communist Party had a de facto monopoly of power, and exercising de facto power against written rules creates unnecessary difficulties. Indeed, it may not be accidental that the communist rule in Poland was most vulnerable to political crises, including the first breakdown of communist regimes.

A CONSTITUTION

Here are some articles from a constitution:

Article 15.

§1. The highest organ of State power is the Parliament.

§3. The Parliament adopts laws and executes control of activities of other organs of power and public administration.

Article 16.

§3. A deputy to the Parliament cannot be prosecuted or arrested without the consent of the Parliament or, during periods when the Parliament is not in session, of the Council of State.

Article 28a.

§1. The HighestControl Chamber oversees economic, financial, and organizational organs of public administration.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barros, Robert. 2002. Constitutionalism and Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenan, Gerald. 1943. The Spanish Labyrinth: The Social and Political Background of the Spanish Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Czubiński, Antoni. 1992. Dzieje Najnowsze Polski, 1944–1989. Poznań: Wielkopolska Agencja Wydawnicza.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Stanisław. 1956. Praworzdność, Sejm. Warszawa.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1984. Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2000. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargarella, Roberto. 2000. Los fundamentos legales de la desigualidad: El constitucionalismo en América (1776–1860). Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. 1995. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. 2011. Constitutions and Constitutionalism. Ms. Law School, New York University.Google Scholar
Komarnicki, W. 1938. Nowy ustrój państwowy Zwizku Sowietów. Wilno.Google Scholar
Krukowski, Stanislaw. 1990. “Mala Konstytucja z 1919 r,” in Konstytucje Polski: Studja monograficzne z dziejów polskiego konstytucjonalizmu vol. 2. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, pp. 7–18.Google Scholar
Łopatka, Adam. 1963. Kierownicza Rola Partii Komunistycznej w Stosunku do Państwa Socjalistycznego. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. 1989 [1971]. The Rights of Man, in Paine: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Poulantzas, Nicos. 1973. Political Power and Social Classes. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
Rozmaryn, Stefan. 1961. Konstytucja Jako Ustawa Zasadnicza PRL. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
Rybicki, Marian. 1990. “Konstytucja Polskiej Rzeczypospolitej Ludowej z 1952r,” in Kallas, Marian, ed., Konstytucje Polski, vol. 2. Warszawa: PWN, pp. 311–43.Google Scholar
Vlahović, Veljko. 1963. “Role of the Leading Factors of the Social Consciousness. Beograd.” Review of International Affairs 1: 49–53.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×