Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T19:36:55.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Periodic transonic flow and control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2016

S. Raghunathan ,
J.M. Early ,
C. Tulita ,
E. Benard  and
J. Quest
S. Raghunathan
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queens University, Belfast, UK
J.M. Early
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queens University, Belfast, UK
C. Tulita
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queens University, Belfast, UK
E. Benard
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queens University, Belfast, UK
J. Quest
Affiliation:
European Transonic Windtunnel, Cologne, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current understanding of periodic transonic flow is reviewed briefly. The effects of boundary-layer transition, non-adiabatic wall conditions and modifications to the aerofoil surface geometry at the shock interactions on periodic transonic flow are discussed. Through the methods presented, it is proposed that the frequency of periodic motion can be predicted with reasonable accuracy, but there are limitations on the prediction of buffet boundaries associated with periodic transonic flows. Several methods have been proposed by which the periodic motion may be virtually eliminated, most relevantly by altering the position of transition fix, contouring the aerofoils surface or adding a porous surface and a cavity in the region of shock interaction. In addition, it has been shown that heat transfer can have a significant effect on buffet.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Aeronautical Journal , Volume 112 , Issue 1127 , January 2008 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Aeronautical Society 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Arguelles, P., Bischoff, M., Busquin, P., Droste, B.A.C., Evans, R., Kroll, W., Lagardere, J.L., Lina, A., Lumsden, J., Ranque, D., Rasmusseen, S., Reutlinder, P., Robins, R., Terho, H. and Wittlov, A., European Aeronautics: A Vision for 2020, Report of the Group of Personalities, The European Commission, January 2001 Google Scholar
2. McDewitt, J.B., Levy, L.L. Jr. and Diewart, G.S., Transonic periodic flow about a thick bi-convex aerofoil, AIAA J, 14, 1976, pp 606–613 Google Scholar
3. Magnus, R. and Yoshikara, H., Transonic oscillating flap, AIAA 9th Fluid and Plasma Dynamics Conference, San Diego, USA, paper 76-327, July 1976.Google Scholar
4. Tijdeman, H., Investigation of the transonic flow around oscillating airfoils, National Aerospace Lab, The Netherlands, NLR TR-77-090U, 1977.Google Scholar
5. Seegmiller, H.L., Marvin, J.G. and Levy, L.L. Jr, Steady and unsteady transonic flow, AIAA paper 78-160, 1978.Google Scholar
6. Levy, L.L Jr. Experimental and computational steady unsteady transonic flows about a thick airfoil, AIAA J, 1978, 16, pp 564–572.Google Scholar
7. Wang, H., Hwang, H.C. and Pi, W.S., Transonic buffet behaviour of Northrop F-5A Aircraft AGARD R624, 1974.Google Scholar
8. McDevitt, J.B., Supercritical flow about a thick circular-arc airfoil. NASA-TM-78549, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, January 1979.Google Scholar
9. Mabey, D.G., Oscillatory flow from shock induced separation on biconvex airfoils of varying thickness in ventilated wind-tunnels. AGARD CP 296, boundary-layer effects on unsteady air-loads, Aix-en-Provence, France, paper 11, 14-19 September 1980, pp 1–14.Google Scholar
10. Le Balleur, C., Computation of flows including viscous interactions with coupling methods. General Introduction Lecture 1, AGARD CP-291, computation of viscous-inviscid interactions, United States Air Force Academy. Colorado Springs Colorado, USA, 29 September-1 October 1980.Google Scholar
11. Selerowicz, W.C. and Szumowski, A.P., Airflow unstabilities induced by background flow oscillations. Experiments in fluids, 2002, 32, pp 441–446.Google Scholar
12. Mabey, D.G., Welsh, B.L. and Cripps, B.E., Periodic flows on a rigid 14% thick biconvex wing at transonic speeds. TR 81059, Royal Aircraft Establishment, May 1981.Google Scholar
13. McDevitt, J.B. and Okuno, A.F., Static and dynamic pressure measurements on a NACA 0012 Airfoil in the Ames High Reynolds Number Facility, NASA TP-2485, June 1985.Google Scholar
14. Raghunathan, S., Passive control of shock boundary-layer interaction, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1988, 25, pp 271–296.Google Scholar
15. Girodroux-Lavigne, P. and Le Balleur, J.C., Time-consistent computation of transonic buffet over airfoils. Proceedings of 16th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS 88-5.52, 1988, pp 779–787.Google Scholar
16. Gibb, J., The cause and cure of periodic Flows at transonic speeds, ICAS, Paper 3, 1988, 10, (1).Google Scholar
17. Lee, B.H.K., Oscillatory shock motion caused by transonic shock boundary-layer interaction. AIAA J, 1990, (28), pp 942–944.Google Scholar
18. Raghunathan, S., Hall, D.E. and Mabey, D.G., Alleviation of Shock oscillations in transonic flow by passive control. Aeronaut J, 1990, 94, (937), pp 245–250.Google Scholar
19. Mabey, D.G., Effects of heat transfer in aerodynamics and possible implications for wind-tunnel tests, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 27, (4), pp 267–303, 1991.Google Scholar
20. Bennet, M.R., Dansberry, B.E., Farmer, M.G., Eckstrom, C.V., Seidel, D.A. and Rivera, J.A., Transonic shock-induced dynamics of flexible wing with a thick circular-arc aerofoil, AIAA paper 91-1107, 1991.Google Scholar
21. Raghunathan, S., Zarifi-Rad, F. and Mabey, D.G., Effect of model cooling in transonic periodic flow. AIAA J, 1992, 30, (8), pp 2080–2089.10.2514/3.11182Google Scholar
22. Edwards, J., Transonic shock oscillations calculated with a new interactive boundary-layer coupling method, AIAA paper 93-0777, 1993.Google Scholar
23. Raghunathan, S. and Mitchell, D., Computed effects of heat transfer on transonic flows. AIAA J, 1995, 33, (11), pp 2120–2127.Google Scholar
24. Rumsey, C.L., Sanetrik, M.D., Biedron, R.T., Melson, N.D. and Parlette, E.B., Efficiency and accuracy of time-accurate turbulent Navier-Stokes computations. AIAA paper 95-1835, 1995.Google Scholar
25. Bartel, R.E. and Rothmayer, A.P., An IBL approach to multi-scaled shock induced oscillations, AIAA 26th Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, USA, paper 95-2157, 1995.Google Scholar
26. Stanewsky, E., Euroshock I AND II: A SURVEY. Drag reduction by shock and boundarylayer control, IUTAM Symposium on Mechanics of passive and active flow control, Göttingen, 1998, pp 35–43.Google Scholar
27. Raghunathan, S., Mitchell, R.D. and Gillan, M.A., Transonic shock oscillations on NACA0012 aerofoil, Shock Waves, 1998, 8, pp 191–202.Google Scholar
28. Lee, B.H.K., Oscillatory shock motion caused by transonic shock boundary-layer interaction. AIAA J, 1989, 28, (5), pp 942–944.Google Scholar
29. Raghunathan, S., Gillan., M.A., Cooper, R.K., Mitchell, R.D. and Cole, J.S., Shock Oscillations on biconvex aerofoils, Aerospace Science and Technology, 1999, 3, (1), pp 1–9.10.1016/S1270-9638(99)80017-0Google Scholar
30. Mitchell, D.A., Cooper, R.K. and Raghunathan, S., Effect of heat transfer on periodic transonic flows, Aeronaut J, July 1999, 103, (1025), pp 329–337.Google Scholar
31. Lee, B.H.K. Self-sustained shock oscillations on airfoils at transonic speed, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2001, 37, pp 147–196.Google Scholar
32. Lee, B.H.K., Transonic buffet on a supercritical aerofoil, Aeronaut J, 1990, 94, (935), pp 143–152.Google Scholar
33. Lee, B.H.K., Ellis, F.A. and Bureau, J., Investigation of the buffet characteristics of two supercritical airfoils, J Aircr, 1989, 26, (8), pp 731–736.Google Scholar
34. Lee, B.H.K., Murty, H., and Jiang, H., Role of kutta waves on oscillatory shock motion on an airfoil, AIAA J, 1994, 32, (4), pp 789–795.Google Scholar
35. Bartels, R.E., Flow and turbulence modeling and computation of shock buffet onset for conventional and supercritical airfoils, NASA TP-1998-206908, February 1998.Google Scholar
36. Bartels, R.E. and Edwards, J.W., Cryogenic tunnel pressure measurements on a supercritical airfoil for several shock buffet conditions, NASA TM-110272, 1997.Google Scholar
37. Bartel, R.R., Computation of shock buffet onset on conventional and supercritical aerofoil., AIAA Aerospace Sciences meeting, AIAA paper 97-0833, Reno, Nevada, USA, January 1997.Google Scholar
38. Tulita, C., Raghunathan, S. and Benard, E., Control of transonic periodic flow on NACA0012 aerofoil by contour bumps. IUTAM Symposium Transsonicum IV, pp 291–297, Göttingen, 2002.Google Scholar
39. Tulita, C., Benard, E. and Raghunathan, S., Transonic periodic flow subject to adaptive bump. AIAA 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, USA, paper 2003-0444, 2003.Google Scholar
40. Tulita, C., Turkbeyer, E. and Raghunathan, S., Investigation of the influence of turbulent transition on periodic transonic flow. Symposium Integrated CFD and Experimental Aerodynamics, Cranfield, UK, 5–6 September 2005.Google Scholar
41. Barakos, G. and Drikakis, D., Numerical simulation of transonic buffet flows using various turbulence closures, Int J Heat and Fluid Flow, 21, (5), 2000, pp 620–626.Google Scholar
42. Xiao, Q., Tsai, H.M., Liu, F., Numerical study of transonic buffet on a supercritical airfoil, AIAA J, 44, (3), March 2006, pp 620–628 Google Scholar
43. Raghunthan, S., Gillan, M.A. and Mitchell, R.D., Studies on alleviation of buffet in periodic transonic flow, AIAA J, 35, (12), 1997, pp 1890–1891.Google Scholar
44. Pulliam, T., Time accuracy and the use of implicit methods, AIAA paper 93-3360-CP, July 1993.Google Scholar
45. Jameson, A., Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings, AIAA paper 91-1596.Google Scholar
46. Baldwin, B. and Lomax, H., Thin layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flow, AIAA paper 78-257.Google Scholar
47. Spalart, P.S. and Allmaras, S., A one equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows, AIAA paper 92-0439, 1992.Google Scholar
48. Van Leer, B., Flux vector splitting for the Euler equations, ICASE Report 82-30, 1982.Google Scholar
49. Mulder, W.A. and Van Leer, B., Implicit upwind methods for the Euler equations, AIAA paper 83-1930, 1983.Google Scholar
50. Koch, S. and Rosemann, H., Experimental investigations of shock oscillations in cryogenic Ludweig tube, DLR report, 1B, 224-2002CO3, 2002.Google Scholar
51. Deiwert, G.S., Numerical simulation of high Reynolds number transonic flows, AIAA J, 1975, 13, pp 1354–1359.Google Scholar
52. Steger, J.L., Implicit finite-difference simulation of flow about arbitrary two-dimensional geometries. AIAA J, 1978, 16, pp 679–686.Google Scholar
53. Batina, J.T., Unsteady transonic small-disturbance theory including entropy and vorticity effects, J Aircr, June 1989, 26, pp 531–538.Google Scholar
54. Green, J.E., Weeks, DJ. and Brooman, J.W.F., Prediction of turbulent boundary layers and wakes in compressible flow by a lag-entrainment, method. R&M No. 3791, British Aeronautical research Council, 1977.Google Scholar
55. Melnik, R.E. and Brook, J.W., The Computation of Viscid/Inviscid Interaction on Airfoils With Separated Flow. Third Symposium on Numerical and Physical aspects of Aerodinamic Flows, California State University, 1985, pp 1–21–1–37.Google Scholar
56. Carter, J.E., A new boundary-layer inviscid interaction technique for separated flows. AIAA paper 791-1450.Google Scholar
57. Pappas, C.C., Measurement of heat transfer in the turbulent boundary layer on a flat plate in supersonic flow and comparison with skin friction results, NACA TN 3222.Google Scholar
58. Spalding, D.B. and Chi, S.W., The drag of a compressible turbulent boundary layer on a smooth flat plate with and without heat transfer, J Fluid Mechanics, 18, pp 117–143.Google Scholar
59. Back, L.H. and Cuffel, R.F., Shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interactions with and without surface cooling, AIAA J, 14, (4), pp 526–532.Google Scholar
60. Van Driest, E.R., Convective heat transfer in gases. Turbulent flows and heat Transfer in High Speed Aerodynamics and Jet Propulsion, Section F, 5, Oxford University Press, 1969, UK.Google Scholar
61. Green, J.E., Weeks, D.J. and Pugh, P.G., Heat transfer as a source of spurious scale effects in subsonic and transonic wind-tunnels, ARC 38182, May 1979.Google Scholar
62. Dougherty, N.S. and Fisher, D.F., boundary-layer transition on a 10 cone: wind-tunnel and flight test correlation. AIAA paper 80-01544, 1980.Google Scholar
63. Liepmann, H.W. and Fila, G.H., Investigations of effect of surface temperature and single roughness elements on boundary-layer transition. NACA TN 1196, 1947.Google Scholar
64. Frishett, J.C., Incipient Separation of a Supersonic Turbulent Boundary Layer Including Effects of Heat Transfer, PhD Thesis, University of California, USA, 1971.Google Scholar
65. Inger, G.R., Lynch, F.T and Faucher, M.F., A theoretical and experimental study on non-adiabatic wall effects on transonic shock-boundary-layer interaction. AIAA paper 83-1421, 1983.Google Scholar
66. Delery, J.M., Shock wave-turbulent boundary-layer interaction and its control. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1985, 22, pp 209–280.Google Scholar
67. Raghunathan, S., Passive control of shock boundary-layer Interaction, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 1988, 25, pp 271–296.Google Scholar
68. Ashill, P.R., Fulker, J. and Shires, A., A novel technique for controlling shock strength of laminar-flow aerofoil sections, Proceed of the First European Forum on Laminar Flow Technology, DGLR-Bericht 92-06, 1992.Google Scholar
69. Stanewsky, E., Fulker, J., Delery, J. and Geibler, J., Drag Reduction by passive Shock Control-Results of the project EUROSHOCK, AER2-CT92-0049, Notes on Num Fluid Mech, 56, Vieweg Verlag, 1997.Google Scholar
70. Stanewsky, E., Euroshock I AND II: A SURVEY. Drag Reduction by Shock and boundary-layer Control, IUTAM Symposium on Mechanics of Passive and Active Flow Control, Gottingen, 35–43, 1998.Google Scholar
71. Delery, J. and Bur, R., The physics of shock wave/boundary-layer interaction control: last lessons learned. ECCOMAS TP2000-181, Barcelona, Spain, 11-14 September 2000.Google Scholar
72. Sommerer, A., Lutz, T. and Wagner, S., Design of adaptive transonic airfoils by means of numerical optimization, ECCOMAS 2000, Barcelona, Spain, September 2000.Google Scholar
73. Stanewsky, E., Delery, J., Fulker, J. and Matteis, P., DE DRAG, reduction by shock and boundary-layer control. Results of the project EUROSHOCK II BRPR-95-76, Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design, 80, Springer, 2002.Google Scholar
74. Ashill, P.R., Fulker, J.L. and Hackett, K.C., A review of recent developments in flow control, Aeronaut J, May 2005, 105, (1095), pp 205–232.Google Scholar
75. Wadehn, A., Sommerer, Th Lutz, Fokin, D., Prischow, and Wagner, S., Structural concepts and aerodynamic design of shock control bumps, ICAS Proceedings, Canada, September 2002.Google Scholar