Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:50:59.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of body size and body condition on the ovulation rate of ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. J. Ducker  and
J. S. Boyd
M. J. Ducker
Affiliation:
Departments of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Anatomy, Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
J. S. Boyd
Affiliation:
Departments of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Anatomy, Glasgow University Veterinary School, Bearsden, Glasgow
Get access

Summary

Body size was estimated for 255 Greyface ewes using five linear body dimensions. On the basis of this calculated measure combined with a subjective measure of body size 50 small and 50 large ewes were selected for use in the experiment. Precise ovulation data were obtained by endoscopy and this technique allowed the ewes to be mated subsequently.

Body size did not affect the mean ovulation rate of the ewes although, at the same level of body condition, the large ewes were 25% heavier than the small ewes. The ovulation rates and the numbers of lambs born were influenced by changes in live weight and body condition. For these reasons live weight per se was not a good indicator of ovulation rate as ewe live weight was a combination of both body size and body condition. At the same live weight small ewes in improving body condition had a significantly higher ovulation rate than large ewes in reducing body condition.

The onset of the breeding season of the ewes was not affected by their body size. The mean date of onset of oestrous activity for both large and small ewes was 17 October 1972 at a latitude 55° 52′ N.

Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , June 1977 , pp. 377 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, D. M. and Lamming, G. E. 1961. Some effects of nutrition on the growth and sexual development of ewe lambs. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 57: 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiman, B. 1972. The effect of ewe condition at tupping on lambing performance. Expl Husb. 22:22–24.Google Scholar
Bramley, P. S., Denehy, H. L. and Newton, J. E. 1976. The effect of different planes of nutrition before mating on the reproductive performance of Masham ewes. Vet. Rec. 99: 294–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyd, J. S. and Ducker, M. J. 1973. A method of examining the cyclic changes occurring in the sheep ovary using endoscopy. Vet. Rec. 93: 40–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coop, I. E. 1962. Liveweight-productivity relationships in sheep. I. Liveweight and reproduction. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 5: 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coop, I. E. 1966. Effect of flushing on reproductive performance of ewes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 67: 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doney, J. M. and Gunn, R. G. 1973. Progress in studies on the reproductive performance of hill sheep. Rep. Hill Fmg Res. Org. 6: 69–73.Google Scholar
Ducker, M. J. 1971. Photoperiodism in the ewe. Ph.D. Thesis, Fac. Agric, Univ. Reading.Google Scholar
Ducker, M. J. and Boyd, J. S. 1972. The successful use of etorphine hydrochloride/ diprenorphine hydrochloride in sheep. Vet. Rec. 91: 458–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ducker, M. J. and Boyd, J. S. 1974. The effect of daylength and nutrition on the oestrous and ovulatory activity of Greyface ewes. Anim. Prod. 18: 159–167.Google Scholar
Edey, T. N. 1968. Bodyweight and ovulation rate in sheep. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 7: 188–191.Google Scholar
Gerring, J. C. 1954. Flushing of ewes in fat lamb production. N.Z. Jl Agric. 88: 25–27.Google Scholar
Guerra, J. C., Thwaites, C. J. and Edey, T. N. 1972. The effects of components of body weight on reproductive efficiency in the Merino ewe. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 78: 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Doney, J. M. and Russel, A. J. F. 1969. Fertility in Scottish Blackface ewes as influenced by nutrition and body condition at mating. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 73: 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Doney, J. M. and Russel, A. J. F. 1972. Embryo mortality in Scottish Blackface ewes as influenced by body condition at mating and by post-mating nutrition. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 79: 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Large, R. V. 1970. The biological efficiency of meat production in sheep. Anim. Prod. 12: 393–401.Google Scholar
Meat And Livestock Commission. 1973. Feeding the Ewe. Sheep Improvement Service— Tech. Rep. No. 2. Meat and Livestock Commission, Bletchley, Bucks.Google Scholar
Ministry Of Agriculture, Fisheries And Food, Department Of Agriculture And Fisheries For Scotland And Department Of Agriculture For Northern Ireland. 1975. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Tech. Bull., No. 33. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Nichols, C. W. and Whiteman, J. V. 1966. Productivity of farm flock ewes in relation to body size. J. Anim. Sci. 25: 460–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radford, H. M., Watson, R. H. and Wood, G. F. 1960. A crayon and associated harness for the detection of mating under field conditions. Aust. vet. J. 36: 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spedding, C. R. W. 1965. Sheep Production and Grazing Management. Baillière, Tindall and Cox, London.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. 1951. Flushing of ewes. N.Z. Jl Agric. 83: 377–380.Google Scholar
Wallace, L. R. 1961. Influence of live weight and condition on ewe fertility. Proc. Ruakura Fmrs' Conf. Week, pp. 14–25.Google Scholar