Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T16:19:15.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Axioms for convexity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

W.A. Coppel
W.A. Coppel
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Advanced Studies Australian National University, GPO Box 4 Canberra ACT 2601, Australia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The basic elementary results about convex sets are derived successively from various properties of segments. The complete set of properties is shown to form a natural set of axioms characterising the convex sets in a real vector space.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 1993 , pp. 179 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1993

References

[1]Boltyanskii, V.G., ‘The method of tents in the theory of extremal problems’, Russian Math. Surveys 30 (1975), no.3, 1–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Boltyanskii, V.G. and Soltan, P.S., ‘Combinatorial geometry and convexity classes’, Russian Math. Surveys 33 (1978), no.1, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cohn, P.M., Universal algebra, revised edition (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Edelman, P.H. and Jamison, R.E., ‘The theory of convex geometries’, Geom. Dedicata 19 (1985), 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Eggleston, H.G., Convexity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Ellis, J.W., ‘A general set-separation theorem’, Duke Math. J. 19 (1952), 417–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Euclid, , The thirteen books of Euclid's elements, English translation by Heath, T.L., second edition (Dover, New York, 1956).Google Scholar
[8]Hammer, R., ‘Konvexitätsraum und affiner Raum’, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 43 (1975), 105–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Hilbert, D., Foundations of geometry, English translation of tenth German edition (Open Court, LaSalle, Illinois, 1971).Google Scholar
[10]Jamison-Waldner, R.E., ‘A perspective on abstract convexity: classifying alignments by varieties’, in Convexity and related combinatorial geometry, (Kay, D.C. and Breen, M., Editors) (M. Dekker, New York, 1982), pp. 113–150.Google Scholar
[11]Lassak, M., ‘A general notion of extreme subset’, Compositio Math. 57 (1986), 61–72.Google Scholar
[12]Lay, S.R., Convex sets and their applications (John Wiley, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
[13]Martinez-Legaz, J.E. and Singer, I., ‘The structure of hemispaces in R n’, Linear Algebra Appl. 110 (1988), 117–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Monna, A.F., Analyse Non-archimédienne (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Prenowitz, W. and Jantosciak, J., Join geometries (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Sierksma, G., ‘Extending a convexity space to an aligned space’, Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Indag. Math. 46 (1984), 429–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Soltan, V.P., ‘d−convexity in graph’, Soviet Math. Dokl. 28 (1983), 419–421.Google Scholar
[18]Vaisman, I., Foundations of three-dimensional Euclidean geometry (M. Dekker, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
[19]Valentine, F.A., Convex sets (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964).Google Scholar
[20]Whitfield, J.H.M. and Yong, S., ‘A characterization of line spaces’, Canad. Math. Bull. 24 (1981), 273–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar