Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:51:48.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parasitoids of medfly, Ceratitis capitata, and related tephritids in Kenyan coffee: a predominantly koinobiont assemblage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R.A. Wharton ,
M.K. Trostle ,
R.H. Messing ,
R.S. Copeland ,
S.W. Kimani-Njogu ,
S. Lux ,
W.A. Overholt ,
S. Mohamed  and
J. Sivinski
R.A. Wharton*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
M.K. Trostle
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA
R.H. Messing
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii, Kauai Agricultural Research Center, 7370-A Kuamoo Road, Kapaa, Kauai, HI 96746, USA
R.S. Copeland
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), PO Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya:
S.W. Kimani-Njogu
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), PO Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya:
S. Lux
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), PO Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya:
W.A. Overholt
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), PO Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya:
S. Mohamed
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), PO Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya:
J. Sivinski
Affiliation:
Center for Medical Agricultural and Veterinary Entomology, USDA–ARS, Gainesville, FL 32604, USA
*
*Fax: (979) 847 8668 E-mail: rawbaw2@acs.tamu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Arabica coffee was sampled from two sites in the central highlands of Kenya (Rurima, Ruiru) and one site on the western side of the Rift Valley (Koru). Three species of ceratitidine Tephritidae, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann), C. rosaKarsch and Trirhithrum coffeae Bezzi, were reared from sites in the central highlands, and an additional species, C. anonae Graham, was recovered from the western-most site. Ten species of parasitic Hymenoptera were reared from these tephritids. The parasitoid assemblage was dominated by koinobionts. Eight of the species are koinobiont endoparasitoids, but only one idiobiont larval ectoparasitoid was reared, and only one idiobiont pupal endoparasitoid. The effects of sampling bias on determination of parasitoid assemblage size associated with concealed hosts are discussed. The potential for use of these parasitoids in biological control is also discussed. Most of the parasitoid species recovered during this study are capable of developing on C. capitata, while several also attack C. rosa. Both flies are notorious pests of tropical and subtropical fruits.

Type
Review Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 90 , Issue 6 , December 2000 , pp. 517 - 526
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abasa, R.O. (1973) Observations on the seasonal emergence of fruit flies on a Kenya coffee estate and studies of the pest status of Ceratitis capitata Wied. in coffee. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal 39, 144–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, E.A. & Pemberton, C.E. (1918) The Mediterranean fruit fly in Hawaii. United States Department of Agriculture Bulletin 536, 1–118.Google Scholar
Bess, H.A., van den Bosch, R. & Haramoto, F.H. (1961) Fruit fly parasites and their activities in Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 17, 367–378.Google Scholar
Bianchi, F.A. & Krauss, N.H. (1937) Fruit fly investigations in East Africa. Hawaiian Planters’ Record 41, 299–306.Google Scholar
Biliotti, E. & Delanoue, P. (1959) Contribution a l'etude biologique d’Opius concolor Szepl. (Hym. Braconidae) en elevage de laboratoire. Entomophaga 4, 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, C.P., Clancy, D.W. & Chock, Q.C. (1965) Biological control of the Oriental fruit fly (Dacus dorsalis Hendel) and other fruit flies in Hawaii. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 1322, 1–102.Google Scholar
Commonwealth Institute of Entomology (1985) Pterandrus rosa (Karsch) [Diptera: Tephritidae] Natal fruit fly. Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, Distribution Maps of Pests, series A (Agricultural) 153, 1–2. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, London.Google Scholar
Crowe, T.J., Tadesse, G.M. & Tsedeke, A. (1977) An annotated list of insect pests of field crops in Ethiopia. 73 pp. Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Étienne, J. (1973) Lutte biologique et aperçu sur les études entomologiques diverses effectuées ces dernières années à La Réunion. Agronomie Tropicale 28, 683–687.Google Scholar
Féron, M. (1952) Observation sur le parasitisme de Ceratitis capitata Wied. dans le sous Marocain. Revue de Pathologie Végétale et d'Entomologie Agricole de France 31, 99–102.Google Scholar
Fischer, M. (1958) Ueber dei Variabilitaet von taxonomisch wichtigen Merkmalen bei Opius concolor Szepl. (Hym. Braconidae). Entomophaga 3, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, M. (1972) Hymenoptera: Braconidae (Opiinae I). Das Tierreich 91, 1–620.Google Scholar
Fletcher, B.S. (1989) Life history strategies of tephritid fruit flies. pp. 195–208in Robinson, A.S. & Hooper, G. (Eds) Fruit flies, their biology, natural enemies and control. World crop pests 3B. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Gasparich, G.E., Silva, J.G., Han, J.-Y., McPheron, B.A., Steck, G.J. & Sheppard, W.S. (1997) Population genetic structure of Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) and implications for worldwide colonization patterns. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 90, 790–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, A. (1970) Fruit fly damage in Kenya coffee and its possible effects on quality. Kenya Coffee 35, 260–266.Google Scholar
Gilstrap, F.E. & Hart, W.G. (1987) Biological control of the Mediterranean fruit fly in the United States and Central America. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service ARS-56, 1–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greathead, D. (1972) Notes on coffee fruit-flies and their parasites at Kawanda (Uganda). Technical Bulletin of the Commonwealth Institute of Biological Control 15, 11–18.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D.W. (1967) Injurious and beneficial insects in coffee plantations of Costa Rica and Guatemala, 1964. Journal of Economic Entomology 60, 1409–1413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, D.L. & White, I.M. (1997) The identity of Trirhithrum nigrum (Graham) and some new combinations in Ceratitis MacLeay (Diptera: Tephritidae). Entomologist 116, 192–197.Google Scholar
Hawkins, B.A. (1988) Do galls protect endophytic herbivores from parasitoids? A comparison of galling and non-galling Diptera. Ecological Entomology 13, 473–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headrick, D.H. & Goeden, R.D. (1996) Issues concerning the eradication or establishment and biological control of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), in California. Biological Control 6, 412–421.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, T. (1990) Zur Struktur und Dynamik des Parasitoidenkomplexes der Kirschfruchtfliege Rhagoletis cerasi L. (Diptera: Tephritidae) auf Kirschen und Heckenkirschen. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie 7, 546–551.Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, T. (1992) Factors determining the structure and diversity of parasitoid complexes in tephritid fruit flies. Oecologia 89, 288–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffmeister, T., Vidal, S. (1994) The diversity of fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) parasitoids. pp. 47–76in Hawkins, B.A. & Sheehan, W. (Eds) Parasitoids community ecology. Oxford Science Publications, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, W.R. (1965) An evaluation of several insecticides against berry borer and fruit fly in Uganda robusta coffee. East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal 30, 259–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiron, L.F. & Mexzon, R.G. (1989) Parasitoid hymenopterans of Costa Rica: geographical distribution of the species associated with fruit flies [Diptera: Tephritidae]. Entomophaga 34, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapatos, E., Fletcher, B.S., Pappas, S. & Laudeho, Y. (1977) The release of Opius concolor and O. concolor var. siculus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) against the spring generation of Dacus oleae (Dipt: Trypetidae) on Corfu. Entomophaga 22, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knipling, E.F. (1992) Principles of insect parasitism analyzed from new perspectives. Practical implications for regulating insect populations by biological means. United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Agriculture Handbook 693, 1–335.Google Scholar
Kourti, A., Loukas, M. & Sourdis, J. (1992) Dispersion pattern of the medfly from its geographic centre of origin and genetic relationships of the medfly with two close relatives. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 63, 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Pelley, R.H. (1968) Pests of coffee. London, Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
Liquido, N.J., Shinoda, L.A. & Cunningham, R.T. (1991) Host plants of the Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae): an annotated world review. Miscellaneous Publications of the Entomological Society of America 77, 1–52.Google Scholar
Loni, A. (1997) Developmental rate of Opius concolor (Hym.: Braconidae) at various constant temperatures. Entomophaga 42, 359–366.Google Scholar
Lopez, M., Aluja, M. & Sivinski, J. (1999) Hymenopterous larval-pupal and pupal parasitoids of Anastrepha flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Mexico. Biological Control 15, 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchal, P. (1910) Sur un Braconide nouveau, parasite du Dacus oleae. Bulletin de la Societé Entomologique de France 1910, 243–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monastero, S. & Delanoue, P. (1966) Lutte biologique experimentale contre la mouche de l'olive (Dacus oleae Gmel.) au moyen d’Opius concolor Szepl. siculus Mon. dans les iles Eoliennes (Sicilie) en 1965. Entomophaga 11, 411–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukiama, T.K. & Muraya, J.K. (1994) Ceratitid fruitflies infesting fruit crops in Kenya. Insect Science and Application 15, 155–159.Google Scholar
Neuenschwander, P. (1982) Searching parasitoids of Dacus oleae (Gmel.) (Dipt., Tephritidae) in South Africa. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 94, 509–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlander, G. (1982) Identities and relationships of the previously confused genera Odonteucoila, Coneucoela, and Trichoplasta (Hymenoptera, Cynipoidea: Eucoilidae). Entomologica Scandinavica 13, 269–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orian, A.J.E. & Moutia, L.A. (1960) Fruit flies (Trypetidae) of economic importance in Mauritius. Revue Agricole et Sucrière de l'Ile Maurice 39, 142–150.Google Scholar
Pemberton, C.E. & Willard, H.F. (1918) A contribution to the biology of fruit-fly parasites in Hawaii. Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 419–467.Google Scholar
Purcell, M. (1998) Contributions of biological control to integrated pest management of tephritid fruit flies in the tropics and subtropics. Integrated Pest Management Reviews 3, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quaintance, A.L. (1912) The Mediterranean fruit-fly. United States Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology Circular 160, 1–25.Google Scholar
Ramadan, M.M., Wong, T.T.Y. & Beardsley, J.W. (1989) Insectary production of Biosteres tryoni (Cameron) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a larval parasitoid of Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 29, 41–48.Google Scholar
Raspi, A. & Loni, A. (1994) Alcune note sull'allevamento massale di Opius concolor Szépligeti (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) e su recenti tentativi d'introduzione della specie in Toscana e Liguria. Frustula Entomologica 30, 135–145.Google Scholar
Ritchie, A.H. (1935) Report of the entomologist, 1934. Tanganyika Territory Department of Agriculture Annual Report 1934 73–83.Google Scholar
Silvestri, F. (1913) Viaggio in Africa per cercare parassiti di mosche dei frutti. Bolletino del Laboratorio di Zoologia Generale e Agraria della R. Scuola Superiore d'Agricoltura, Portici 8, 1–164. [English version published in 1914 in Territory of Hawaii, Board of Agriculture and Forestry, Division of Entomology Bulletin 3, 1–146].Google Scholar
Sivinski, J., (1996) The past and potential of biological control of fruit flies. pp. 369–375in McPheron, B.A. & Steck, G.J. (Eds) Fruit fly pests a world assessment of their biology and management. Delray Beach, St Lucie Press.Google Scholar
Steck, G.J., Gilstrap, F.E., Wharton, R.A. & Hart, W.G. (1986) Braconid parasitoids of Tephritidae [Diptera] infesting coffee and other fruits in West-Central Africa. Entomophaga 31, 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steck, G.J., Gasparich, G.E., Han, H.-Y., McPheron, B.A. & Sheppard, W.S. (1996) Distribution of mictochondrial DNA haplotypes among Ceratitis capitata populations worldwide. pp. 291–296in McPheron, B.A. & Steck, G.J. (Eds) Fruit fly pests: a world assessment of their biology and management. Delray Beach, St Lucie Press.Google Scholar
Van Zwaluwenburg, R.H. (1937) West African notes. Hawaiian Planters’ Record 41, 57–83.Google Scholar
Waikwa, J.W. (1978) Coffee fruitfly breeding seasons in Kenya. Kenya Coffee 43, 375–381.Google Scholar
Weems, H.V. (1981) Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry, Entomological Circular 230, 1–8.Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A. (1987) Changes in nomenclature and classification of some opiine Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 89, 61–73.Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A. (1989a) Classical biological control of fruit-infesting Tephritidae. pp. 303–313in Robinson, A.S. & Hooper, G. (Eds) Fruit flies, their biology, natural enemies and control. World crop pests 3B. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A. (1989b) Biological control of fruit-infesting Tephritidae. pp. 323–332in Cavalloro, R. (Ed.) Fruit flies of economic importance 87. Rotterdam, Balkema.Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A. (1997) Generic relationships of opiine Braconidae (Hymenoptera) parasitic on fruit-infesting Tephritidae (Diptera). Contributions of the American Entomological Institute 30, 1–53.Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A. (1999) A review of the Old World genus Fopius Wharton (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Opiinae), with description of two new species reared from fruit-infesting Tephritidae (Diptera). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 8, 48–64.Google Scholar
Wharton, R.A. & Gilstrap, F.E. (1983) Key to and status of opiine braconid (Hymenoptera) parasitoids used in biological control of Ceratitis and Dacus s. l. (Diptera: Tephritidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 76, 721–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, R.A., Gilstrap, F.E., Rhode, R.H. & Fischel-M., M. (1981) Hymenopterous egg-pupal and larval-pupal parasitoids of Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha spp. [Dip.: Tephritidae] in Costa Rica. Entomophaga 26, 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharton, R.A., Quilici, S., Hurtrel, B. & Mercado, I. (1999) The status of two species of Psyttalia Walker (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Opiinae) reared from fruit-infesting Tephritidae (Diptera) on the Indian Ocean Islands of Reunion and Mauritius. African Entomology 7, 85–90.Google Scholar
White, I.M. & Elson-Harris, M.M. (1992) Fruit flies of economic significance: their identification and bionomics. Wallingford, CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willard, H.F. & Mason, A.C. (1937) Parasitization of the Mediterranean fruitfly in Hawaii, 1914–33. United States Department of Agriculture Circular 439, 1–17.Google Scholar