Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:12:04.329Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Misrule of Law: Land and Usurpation in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

James Holston
James Holston
Affiliation:
University of California at San Diego
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

How do we conceive of law if litigation does not aim to settle conflict, if it is a means to perpetuate and obscure rather than resolve disputes? In this essay, I shall demonstrate the power of an unsettling norm: The Brazilian legal system aims neither to solve land conflicts justly nor to decide their legal merits through adjudication. My argument stresses intention and norm because land law in Brazil is so confusing, indecisive, and dysfunctional in its own terms that one suspects that the cause of these characteristics is not incompetence or corruption alone but rather the force of a set of intentions concerning its construction and application different from those aimed at resolution. Thus, I argue that Brazilian law regularly produces unresolvable procedural and substantive complexity in land conflicts; that this jural-bureaucratic irresolution dependably initiates extrajudicial solutions; and that these political impositions inevitably legalize usurpations of one sort or another. In short, land law in Brazil promotes conflict, not resolution, because it sets the terms through which encroachments are reliably legalized. It is thus an instrument of calculated disorder by means of which illegal practices produce law and extralegal solutions are smuggled into the judicial process. In this paradoxical context, law itself is a means of manipulation, complication, stratagem, and violence by which all parties—public and private, dominant and subaltern—further their interests. It therefore defines an arena of conflict in which distinctions between legal and illegal are temporary and their relations unstable.

Type
Twisting the Arm of the Law
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , October 1991 , pp. 695 - 725
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amnesty International. 1988. Report on Brazil. London: Amnesty International Publications.Google Scholar
Barnes, J.A. 1961. “Law as Politically Active: An Anthropological View,” in Studies in the Sociology of Law, Geoffrey, Sawer, ed., 167–96. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Batalha, Wilson de Souza Campos. 1984. Comentários à Lei de Registros Públicos, vols. 1–2, 3rd ed., rev. and exp. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense.Google Scholar
Bomtempi, Sylvio. 1970. O Bairro de Sāo Miguel Paulista: A Aldeia de Sāo Miguel de Ururaí na História de Sāo Paulo. São Paulo: Prefeitura Municipal de Sāo Paulo.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Teresa Pires do Rio. 1984. A Político dos Outros: O Cotidiano dos Moradores da Periferia e o que Pensam do Poder e dos Poderosos. Sāo Paulo: Editora Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Teresa Pires do Rio. 1986. “Electoral Struggles in a Neighborhood on the Periphery of Sāo Paulo.” Politics and Society, 15:1, 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, José Murilo de. 1981. “Modernização frustrada: a política de terras no império.” Revista Brasileira de História, 03 1981, 39–57.Google Scholar
Chaloub, Sidney. 1990. Visōes da Liberdade. Sāo Paulo: Companhia das Letras.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard S. 1989. “Law and the Colonial State in India,” in History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology, June, Starr and Collier, Jane F. eds., 131–52. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Código Civil Brasileiro. 1990. Edited Notes and Indices by Juarez de Oliveira. Sāo Paulo: Editora Saraiva.Google Scholar
DaMatta, Roberto. 1991 [1979]. Carnivals, Rogues, and Heroes: An Interpretation of the Brazilian Dilemma, John, Drury, trans. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Reprint. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores.Google Scholar
Dean, Warren. 1971. “Latifundia and Land Policy in Nineteenth-Century Brazil.” Hispanic Historical American Review, 51:4, 606–25.Google Scholar
Estado de, Sāo Paulo. 1935. Anais da Assembleia Constituinte. Sāo Paulo: Imprensa Oficial.Google Scholar
Faoro, Raymundo. 1975. Os Donos do Poder: Formaçāo do Patronato Político Brasileiro, 2nd ed.SāoPaulo: Editora da Universidade de Sāo Paulo.Google Scholar
França, , , Rubens Limongi, ed. 1977. Enciclopédia Saraiva do Direito. Sāo Paulo: Editora Saraiva.Google Scholar
Gluckman, Max. 1955. The Judicial Process among the Barotse of Northern Rhodesia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Gluckman, Max 1956. Custom and Conflict in Africa. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J. 1989. “Interpreting American Litigiousness,” in History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology, June, Starr and Collier, Jane F., eds., 252–73. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gulliver, Philip H. 1963. Social Control in an African Society. Boston: Boston University Press.Google Scholar
Holston, James. 1989. The Modernist City: An Anthropological Critique of Brasília. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holston, James. 1991. “Autoconstruction in Working-Class Brazil.” Cultural Anthropology, 6:4, 446–63.Google Scholar
Holston, James n.d. “The Illegal Periphery: Social Movements and the Politics of Property in Sāo Paulo.”Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund. 1963. “Law as a Condition of Freedom,” in The Concept of Freedom in Anthropology, David, Bidney, ed., 74–90. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund. 1977. Custom, Law, and Terrorist Violence. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Levenhagen, Antônio José de Souza. 1982. Posse, Possessória e Usucapiāo. Sāo Paulo: Editora Atlas.Google Scholar
Lima, Ruy Cirne. 1988 [1954]. Pequena História Territorial do Brasil: Sesmarias e Terras Devolutas, 4th ed.Brasília: Escola de Administraçāo Fazendária.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl; and Hoebel, E.A.. 1941. The Cheyenne Way: Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1926. Crime and Custom in Savage Society. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Metrô, Companhia do Metropolitano de Sāo Paulo. 1990. Pesquisa OD/87 (Pesquisa Origem e Destino 1987): Regiāo Metropolitana de Sāo Paulo, Síntese das Informaçōes. Sāo Paulo: Metrô.Google Scholar
Miranda, Pontes de. 1928. Fontes e Evolucāo do Direito Civil Brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Pimenta de Mello and C.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk. 1989. “History and the Redefinition of Custom on Kilimanjaro,” in History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology, June, Starr and Collier, Jane F., eds., 277–301. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Laura, Nader. 1965. “The Anthropological Study of Law.” American Anthropologist, 67, no. 6, pt. 2, 3–32.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. 1969. “Styles of Court Procedure: To Make the Balance,” in Law in Culture and Society, Laura, Nader, ed., 69–91. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura 1989. “The Crown, the Colonists, and the Course of Zapotec Village Law,” in History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology, June, Starr and Collier, Jane F., eds., 320–44. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nascimento, Tupinambá Miguel Castro do. 1986. Posse e Propriedade. Rio de Janeiro: Aide Editora.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A.R. 1933. “Primitive Law,” in Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 9, 202–6. New York: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Silvio. 1987. Direito das Coisas, vol. 5 of Direito Civil. Sāo Paulo: Editora Saraiva.Google Scholar
Rolnik, Raquel; Lucio, Kowarik and Somekh, Nadia93:95, eds. 1990. Sāo Paulo: Crise e Mudança. Sāo Paulo: Brasiliense.Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1988. O Discurso e o Poder: Ensaio sobre a Sociologia da Retórica Juródica. Porto Alegre: Sergio Antonio Fabris Editor.Google Scholar
Schapera, Isaac. 1955 [1938]. A Handbook of Tswana Law and Custom, 2nd ed.London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seade, Fundaçāo Sistema Estadual de Analise de Dados. 1989. Dados do Municipio de Sāo Paulo. Sāo Paulo: Seade.Google Scholar
Shirley, Robert Weaver. 1987. Antropologia Jurídica. Sāo Paulo: Editora Saraiva.Google Scholar
Silva, De Plácido e. 1967. Vocabulário Jurídico, 4 vols., 2nd ed.Rio de Janeiro: Editora Forense.Google Scholar
Starr, June; and Collier, Jane F.. 1989. “Introduction: Dialogues in Legal Anthropology,” in History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology, June, Starr and Collier, Jane F., eds., 1–28. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Viana, Marco Aurelio S. 1985. Das Ações Possessórias. Sāo Paulo: Editora Saraiva.Google Scholar
Vincent, Joan. 1989. “Contours of Change: Agrarian Law in Colonial Uganda, 1895–1962,” in History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology, June, Starr and Collier, Jane F., eds., 153–67. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Viotti da Costa, Emilia. 1985. The Brazilian Empire: Myths and Histories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar