Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:40:24.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing Common Markets: A Revised Neo-Functionalist Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

J. S. Nye
Get access

Extract

There are several approaches to regional integration, both in actor's strategies and in academic analysis. One of the pioneering political science efforts at providing a causal model of regional integration was developed under the stimulus of events in Western Europe in the late 1950's and not surprisingly it reflects these origins. We will refer to it as academic neo-functionalism.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Organization , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , Autumn 1970 , pp. 796 - 835
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

A member of the Board of Editors of International Organization, is an associate professor in the Government Department at Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. The author is grateful to Hayward Alker, Lawrence Finkelstein, Ernst Haas, Stanley Hoffmann, Harold Jacobson, Peter Katzenstein, Robert Keohane, Uwe Kitzinger, Leon Lindberg, Stuart Scheingold, Philippe Schmitter, and Robert van Schaik for their comments on an earlier version of this paper.

References

1 A pioneering work of the same period which gave rise to the broader “transactional” approach was Deutsch, Karl W., and others, Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1957Google Scholar). For the differences between federal, functional, and neo-functional strategies see Nye, J. S., Peace In Parts (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., forthcoming), chapter 2Google Scholar.

2 Nor is it well suited for the analysis of hegemonic (e.g., France-Monaco) and coercive integration (e.g., nineteenth-century Germany) in which the preferences of one partner tend to determine the process. We deal with the ambiguities of symmetry in some detail below.

3 Haas, Ernst B., The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950—1957 (Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1958)Google Scholar.

4 Lindberg, Leon N., The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration (Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press, 1963)Google Scholar; Haas, Ernst B. and Schmitter, Philippe C., “Economics and Differential Patterns of Political Integration: Projections about Unity in Latin America,” International Organization, Autumn 1964 (Vol. 18, No. 4), pp. 705–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 See, for example, Nye, J. S., “Patterns and Catalysts in Regional Integration, ” International Organization, Autumn 1965 (Vol. 19, No. 4), pp. 870–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hoffmann, Stanley, “Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation-State and the Case of Western Europe,” Daedalus, Summer 1966 (Vol. 95, Nos. 3–4), pp. 862–916Google Scholar; Hansen, Roger D., “Regional Integration: Reflections on a Decade of Theoretical Efforts,” World Politics, 01 1969 (Vol. 21, No. 2), pp. 257–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Barrera, Mario and Haas, Ernst B., “The Operationalization of Some Variables Related to Regional Integration: A Research Note,” International Organization, Winter 1969 (Vol. 23, No. 1), pp. 150–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and Schmitter, Philippe C., “Further Notes on Operationalizing Some Variables Related to Regional Integration,” International Organization, Spring 1969 (Vol. 23, No. 2), pp. 327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 See Nye, Joseph S., “Comparative Regional Integration: Concept and Measurement,” International Organization, Autumn 1968 (Vol. 22, No. 4), pp. 855–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In several places below I refer to terms defined in the earlier article.

8 Haas, and Schmitter, , International Organization, Vol. 18, No. 4, p. 705CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Servan-Schreiber, J. J., The American Challenge, trans, by Steel, Ronald (New York: Atheneum, 1969)Google Scholar.

10 Pinder, John, “Problems of Economic Integration,” in Denton, G. R. (ed.), Economic Integration in Europe (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1969), p. 145Google Scholar.

11 In practice this could be done by applying Leon Lindberg's scale of locus of decision (see Lindberg, Leon N., “The European Community as a Political System: Notes toward the Construction of a Model,” Journal of Common Market Studies, 06 1967 [Vol. 5, No. 4], p. 359CrossRefGoogle Scholar) to the following policies which are regarded by Bela Balassa as part of economic union: 1) free trade (percentage of trade included); 2) customs union (percentage of imports covered by common external tariff); 3) degree of freedom of flow of labor and capital; 4) fiscal policy; 5) countercyclical policy; 6) monetary policy; 7) social policies. See Balassa, Beta, Theory of Economic Integration (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1962), p. 1Google Scholar. Pinder would add: 1) industrial investment and location policy; 2) coordination of managed or regulated markets (e.g., agriculture, transport, energy); 3) scientific and technological research; 4) external commercial policy; 5) internal regional incomes equalization policy. This gives us a list of twelve economic policies (instead of Lindberg's more varied seventeen) for constructing an index of extent of economic policy coordination as a measure of our dependent variable.

12 In his article in this issue Lindberg lists 22 external, political-constitutional, sociocultural, and economic issue areas. Twelve of the 22 are economic and very similar to my list. The two approaches are very similar. The broader list has the advantage of completeness but also raises more problems about weighting the issue areas.

13 Haas, Ernst B., “The Uniting of Europe and the Uniting of Latin America,” Journal of Common Market Studies, 06 1967 (Vol. 5, No. 4), pp. 315–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 See Graubard, Stephen (ed.), A New Europe? (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1964)Google Scholar.

15 Nye, Joseph S. Jr, “Central American Regional Integration,” International Conciliation, 03 1967 (No. 562), p. 27Google Scholar. Mitchell, Christopher, “The Role of Technocrats in Latin American Integration,” Inter-American Economic Affairs, Summer 1967 (Vol. 21, No. 1), pp. 3–30Google Scholar.

16 Hoffmann, Stanley, “The European Process at Atlantic Crosspurposes,” Journal of Common Market Studies, 02 1965 (Vol. 3, No. 2), pp. 85–101Google Scholar.

17 See Lindberg, Leon and Scheingold, Stuart, Europe's Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community (Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1970)Google Scholar.

18 Rabier, Jacques-René, L'Opinion publique et l'Europe (Brussels: Institute of Sociology, University of Brussels, 1966).Google Scholar

19 Deutsch found a close association between the rise of a new elite and integration in the historical cases in Deutsch, and others.

20 European Community, 06 1967 (No. 103), p. 11Google Scholar.

21 The crisis-torn Italian government delayed in following this course.

22 Pryor, Frederic L., The Communist Foreign Trade System (Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press, 1963), p. 199Google Scholar.

23 There is an excellent account in Leon Lindberg's and Stuart Scheingold's book cited above.

24 See Etzioni, Amitai, The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes (New York: Free Press, Collier-Macmillan, 1968), p. 564Google Scholar.

25 Robson, Peter, Economic Integration in Africa (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1968)Google Scholar, chapter 4, and Hazelwood, Arthur, African Integration and Disintegration (London: Oxford University Press, 1967), chapter 3Google Scholar.

26 Lindberg and Scheingold. See also Lindberg, , Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 5, No. 4Google Scholar.

27 See Lambert, John, “The Constitutional Crisis 1965–66,” Journal of Common Market Studies, 05 1966 (Vol. 4, No. 3), pp. 195–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 See Yondorf, Walter, “Monnet and the Action Committee: The Formative Period of the European Communities,” International Organization, Autumn 1965 (Vol. 19, No. 4), pp. 885–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Monnet relied on center-left groups whose importance declined somewhat in the 1960's.

29 See Scheinman, Lawrence, “Some Preliminary Notes on Bureaucratic Relationships in the European Economic Community,” International Organization, Autumn 1966 (Vol. 20, No. 4), pp. 750–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Lindberg and Scheingold, chapter 4.

30 I am indebted to Andrew Taussig for this point.

31 Holt, Stephen, The Common Market (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1967), p. 60Google Scholar. See also Coombes, David, Towards a European Civil Service (European Series No. 7) (London: Chatham House, Political and Economic Planning, 1968)Google Scholar.

32 Interview with Jorge Viteri, UN official, June 1966; Nye, , International Conciliation, No. 562, p. 45Google Scholar.

33 Interview, Dar-es-Salaam, August 1969.

34 Holt, p. 60.

35 On European groups see Feld, Werner, “National Economic Interest Groups and Policy Formation in the EEC,” Political Science Quarterly, 09 1966 (Vol. 81, No. 3), pp. 392—411CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Meynaud, Jean and Sidjanski, Dusan, Les groups de pression dans la Communauté européenne (Montreal: University of Montreal Press, 1969), pp. 473–491Google Scholar; for East Africa see Nye, Joseph S. Jr, Pan-Africanism and East African Integration (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press [under the auspices of the Center for International Affairs], 1965), chapter 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; for Central America see Cochrane, James D., The Politics of Regional Integration: The Central American Case (Tulane Studies in Political Science, Vol. 12) (New Orleans, La: Tulane University Press, 1969), chapter 4Google Scholar.

36 See International Institute for Labor Studies, International Collective Bargaining Symposium held in Geneva, May 1969.

37 Ironically, a 1968 demonstration in Brussels by 5,000 farmers (many of them French) against the EEC can be seen as a better tribute to power in that sector. New York Times, May 28, 1968.

38 See Nye, , International Conciliation, No. 562, p. 50Google Scholar.

39 Lindberg and Scheingold.

40 Lamfalussy, Alexandre, “Europe's Progress: Due to the Common Market?” in Krause, Lawrence B. (ed.), The Common Market: Progress and Controversy (Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1964), pp. 90–107Google Scholar.

41 Anderson, Charles W., Politics and Economic Change in Latin America (Princeton, N.J: D. Van Nostrand, 1967), p. 61Google Scholar; Mazrui, Ali. “Tanzania versus East Africa: A Case of Unwitting Federal Sabotage,” Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies, 11 1965 (Vol. 3, No. 3), pp. 209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 For a distinction between symbolic, normative, and functional nationalism and their different propensilies for international organization see DeLamater, John, Katz, Daniel, and Kelman, Herbert C., “On the Nature of National Involvement: A Preliminary Study,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 09 1969 (Vol. 13, No. 3), pp. 321–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

43 Nye, , International Organization, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 870–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Nye, , International Conciliation, No. 562Google Scholar.

45 See Vernon, Raymond, “The Role of U.S. Enterprise Abroad,” Daedalus, Winter 1969 (Vol. 98, No. 1), p. 123Google Scholar.

46 For an example concerning United States shipping interests see Wionczek, Miguel, “Latin American Integration and United States Economic Policies,” in Gregg, Robert (ed.), International Organization in the Western Hemisphere (Syracuse, N.Y: Syracuse University Press, 1968), pp. 116–117Google Scholar.

47 Cochrane, James D., “Central American Economic Integration: The ‘Integrated Industries’ Scheme,” Inter-American Economic Affairs, Autumn 1965 (Vol. 19, No. 2), pp. 63–74Google Scholar.

48 See the comment by Mikesell, Raymond F. on Allen, Robert Loring, “Integration in Less Developed Areas,” Kyklos, 1961 (Vol. 14, No. 3), p. 334Google Scholar, to the effect that large-scale import substitution under high protection is going to take place anyway, so the larger the market the better.

49 Russett, Bruce M., International Regions and the International System: A Study in Political Ecology (Chicago: Rand McNally & Co., 1967), p. 21Google Scholar.

50 Contrary to the “balance of power” theory, security-communities seem to develop most frequently around cores of strength. …

Deutsch, and others, p. 10.

51 Etzioni, Amitai, Political Unification: A Comparative Study of Leaders and Forces (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1965), p. 297Google Scholar.

52 Dell, Sidney, A Latin American Common Market? (London: Oxford University Press [under the auspices of the Royal Institute of International Affairs], 1966), p. 164ffGoogle Scholar.

53 Schmitter, , International Organization, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

54 My calculation, leaving out military expenditure.

55 See Anderson on the importance of modern groups as a feedback link that contributes to realistic rather than ideological formulation of economic policy.

56 Barrera, and Haas, , and Schmitter, , International Organization, Winter 1969 (Vol. 23, No. 1), pp. 150–160 and 161–166, respectivelyCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

57 See Korbonski, Andrzej, “COMECON,” International Conciliation, 09 1964 (No. 549)Google Scholar. Also Kaser, Michael, COMECON (London: Oxford University Press, 1965), chapters 5 and 6Google Scholar.

58 See Deutsch, Karl, “Communication Theory and Political Integration,” in Jacob, Philip and Toscano, James (ed.), The Integration of Political Communities (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co., 1964), pp. 46–74Google Scholar.

59 Wionczek, in Gregg.

60 See Hansen, Roger D., Central America: Regional Integration and Economic Development (National Planning Association Studies in Development Progress, No. 1) (Washington: National Planning Association, 1967), p. 63Google Scholar.

61 See Kaiser, Karl, “The Interaction of Regional Subsystems: Some Preliminary Notes on Recurrent Patterns and the Role of Superpowers,” World Politics, 10 1968 (Vol. 21, No. 1), pp. 84–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 Hansen, , World Politics, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 257–270Google Scholar, and Schmitter, , International Organization, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 161–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Hoffmann, , Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 Johnson, Harry G., Economic Nationalism in Old and New States (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1968), chapter 1Google Scholar.

65 Lindberg and Scheingold.

66 Banfield, E. C., in A Dictionary of the Social Sciences, ed. by Gould, Julius and Kolb, William L. (Glencoe, Ill: Free Press [compiled under the auspices of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization], 1964)Google Scholar.

67 See Pfaltzgraff, Robert L. and Deghand, James L., “European Technological Collaboration: The Experience of the European Launcher Development Organization,” Journal of Common Market Studies, 09 1968 (Vol. 7, No. 1), pp. 22–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Also Gilpin, Robert, France in the Age of the Scientific State (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1968), chapter 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Haas, and Schmitter, , International Organization, Vol. 18, No. 4, p. 715Google Scholar.

69 Brown, A. J., “Economic Separatism versus a Common Market in Developing Countries,” Yorkshire Bulletin of Economic and Social Research, 05 1961 (Vol. 13, No. 1), pp. 38ffGoogle Scholar.

70 Blough, Roy and Behrman, Jack N., “Problems of Regional Integration in Latin America,” (Committee for Economic Development, Supplementary Paper No. 22), in Regional Integration and the Trade of Latin America (New York: Committee for Economic Development, 1968), p. 31Google Scholar.

71 Lindberg, Leon N., “Integration as a Source of Stress on the European Community System,” in Nye, Joseph S. Jr, (ed.), International Regionalism: Readings (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1968), pp. 231–268Google Scholar.

72 Hoffmann, , Daedalus, Vol. 95, Nos. 3–4, pp. 892–916Google Scholar.

73 Schmitter, Philippe C., “Three Neo-Functionalist Hypotheses about International Integration,” International Organization, Winter 1969 (Vol. 23, No. 1), p. 165CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

74 In Etzioni's view the problem with high-level economic unions is that their need for consensus is out of balance with this capacity to generate it. Etzioni, Amitai, “The Dialectics of Supranational Unification,” American Political Science Review, 12 1962 (Vol. 56, No. 4), p. 933Google Scholar.

75 This does not mean that minor coordination of foreign policies cannot be undertaken at low levels of integration—witness the Scandinavian states at the UN.

76 Hoffmann, , Daedalus, Vol. 95, Nos. 3–4, p. 915Google Scholar.

77 Lindberg, in ibid., pp. 231–268. Krause, Lawrence, European Economic Integration and the United States (Washington: Brookings Institution, 1968)Google Scholar.

78 MacDonald, Robert W., The League of Arab States: A Study in the Dynamics of Regional Organization (Princton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1965), p. 284CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gordon, Bernard K., The Dimensions of Conflict in Southeast Asia (Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1966), p. 142Google Scholar; Dell, Sidney, “Regional Integration and the Industrialization of Less Developed Countries,” Development Digest, 10 1965 (Vol. 3, No. 3), p. 45Google Scholar.

79 Schmitt, Hans O., “Capital Markets and the Unification of Europe,” World Politics, 01 1968 (Vol. 20, No. 2), pp. 228–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

80 Hansen, , World Politics, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 257–270Google Scholar.

81 See Segal, Aaron, The Politics of Caribbean Economic Integration (Puerto Rico: Institute of Caribbean Studies, 1968)Google Scholar.

82 For details see Nye, , International Conciliation, No. 562Google Scholar.

83 Hazelwood, Arthur, “Notes on the Treaty for East African Cooperation,” East African Economic Review, 12 1967 (Vol. 3, No. 2), pp. 63–80Google Scholar; also Robson.

84 See I.M.D. Little, “Regional Integration Companies as an Approach to Economic Integration”; Jaroslav Vanek, “Payments Unions among the Less Developed Countries and their Economic Integration”; and Herrera, Felipe, “The Inter-American Development Bank and the Latin American Integration Movement,” all in journal of Common Market Studies, 12 1966 (Vol. 5, No. 2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

85 See International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, “Multilateral Regional Financing Institutions,” 1968 (mimeographed)Google Scholar; and Singh, Manmohan, “Regional Development Banks,” International Conciliation, 01 1970 (No. 576)Google Scholar.

86 See Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, International Economic Integration among Developing States (CD/R/68.1), Paris, 1968, pp. 71–86. (Mimeographed.)Google Scholar Also Culbert, William, Regionalism in the Northern Tier: The Implications of RCD (Washington: Foreign Service Institute, 1969)Google Scholar.

87 For an example of the restricted possibilities for coalition formation in a single sector approach see Scheinman, Lawrence, “Euratom: Nuclear Integration in Europe,” in Nye, , International Regionalism, pp. 269–281Google Scholar.

88 On the desire of the less developed Romanians to control their own planning see Montias, John, “Background and Origins of the Rumanian Dispute with COMECON,” Soviet Studies, 10 1964 (Vol. 16, No. 2), pp. 125–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

89 See UN Document E/AC.54/L.35, March 20, 1969, p. 16.