Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:33:39.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From international system to international society: structural realism and regime theory meet the English school

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Barry Buzan
Barry Buzan
Affiliation:
Professor of International Studies at theUniversity of Warwick, England, and a Project Director at the Center for Peace and Conflict Research in Copenhagen.
Get access

Abstract

The idea of international society is an essential element in the study of international relations. International society is the core concept of the English school and has not yet been systematically integrated with American-originated structural realism and regime theory. This article brings together these three bodies of theory and shows how they complement and strengthen each other. It uses structural realism to show that international society is, like balance of power, a natural product of anarchic international relations and not, as some in the English school assume, only a result of exceptional historical circumstances. This line of analysis establishes definitional criteria for international society that enable a clear boundary to be drawn between international systems with and without international societies. It also shows how state-based international society relates to individual-based world society and supports an argument that in advanced systems, this relationship becomes complementary, not contradictory. The resulting theoretical synthesis provides an essential historical and political-legal foundation for regime theory, showing that international society is both the intellectual forebear and the necessary condition for the development of regimes. Connection strengthens all three bodies of theory and opens up useful channels that connect realist and liberal thinking. One result is that international society can be used both to conceptualize the complexities of a contemporary global international system, with its network of regimes ordered in terms of concentric circles, and to sketch out a policy-relevant research agenda for understanding it.

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , Summer 1993 , pp. 327 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I would like to thank Richard Little, James Mayall, Nick Rengger, Ole Wæver, Nick Wheeler, and the International Organization referees for comments on earlier drafts of this article.

1. Wæver, Ole, “International Society-Theoretical Promises Unfulfilled?” Cooperation and Conflict 27 (1992) pp. 97–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and in particular pp. 98–100 and 121.

2. Hurrell, Andrew, “International Law and the Study of International Regimes: A Reflective Approach,” in Rittberger, Volker, ed., Beyond Anarchy: International Cooperation and Regimes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar.

3. Cutler, Claire A., “The ‘Grotian Tradition’ in International Relations,” Review of International Studies 17 (01 1991), pp. 41–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4. Mosler, Hermann, The International Society as a Legal Community (Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Sijthoff and Noordhoff, 1980), p. xvGoogle Scholar.

5. See Carr, E. H., The Twenty Years Crisis, 2d ed. (London: Macmillan, 1946), pp. 162–69Google Scholar; Manning, C. A. W., The Nature of International Society (London: LSE, 1962)Google Scholar; Wight, Martin, “Western Values in International Relations,” in Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin, eds., Diplomatic Investigations (London: Allen and Unwin, 1966), pp. 89–131Google Scholar; Wight, Martin, Systems of States (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Wight, Martin, Power Politics (Harmonsworth, England: Penguin, 1979), pp. 105–12Google Scholar; Wight, Gabriele and Porter, Brian, eds., International Theory: The Three Traditions—Martin Wight (Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1991)Google Scholar; Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society (London: Macmillan, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bull, Hedley, Justice in International Relations, 1983–84 Hagey Lectures, University of Waterloo, 1984Google Scholar; Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam, eds., The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Gong, Gerrit W., The Standard of “Civilisation” in International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Watson, Adam, “Hedley Bull, State Systems, and International Studies,” Review of International Studies 13 (04 1987), pp. 147–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Watson, Adam, “Systems of States,” Review of International Studies 16 (04 1990), pp. 99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Watson, Adam, The Evolution of International Society (London: Routledge, 1992)Google Scholar; Vincent, John R., Nonintervention and International Order (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1974)Google Scholar; Vincent, John R., Human Rights and International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986)Google Scholar; and Mayall, James, Nationalism and International Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6. See Holsti, K. J., Peace and War: Armed Conflict and International Order 1648–89 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and K. J. Holsti, “Governance Without Government: Polyarchy in Nineteenth-century European International Politics,” and Zacher, Mark, “The Decaying Pillars of the Westphalian Temple: Implications for International Order and Governance,” in Rosenau, James N. and Czempiel, Ernst-Otto, eds., Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 30–57 and 58–101, respectivelyGoogle Scholar.

7. Watson, The Evolution of International Society.

8. See Carr, , The Twenty Years Crisis, pp. 162–69Google Scholar; and Manning, The Nature of International Society, especially chap. 3.

9. Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso, 1983)Google Scholar.

10. Buzan, Barry, Jones, Charles, and Little, Richard, The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993)Google Scholar, section 3.

11. Hedley Bull and Adam Watson, “Introduction,” in Bull, and Watson, , Expansion of International Society, pp. 1–9Google Scholar. The quotation is drawn from p. 1.

12. Little, Richard, “The Systems Approach,” in Smith, Steven, ed., International Relations: British and American Approaches (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985), pp. 70–91Google Scholar.

13. Wight, Systems of States.

14. Bull, Hedley, “The Emergence of a Universal International Society,” in Bull, and Watson, , Expansion of International Society, pp. 117–26Google Scholar.

15. Gong, The Standard of “Civilisation “ in International Society.

16. Buzan, Jones, and Little, The Logic of Anarchy, chaps. 4–9.

17. See Gong, The Standard of “Civilisation” in International Society; Watson, “Hedley Bull, State Systems, and International Studies”; and Zhang, Yongjin, “China's Entry into International Society: Beyond the Standard of Civilization,” Review of International Studies 17 (01 1991), pp. 3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18. Jones, Roy E., “The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure,” Review of International Studies 7 (01 1981), pp. 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19. See Bull, , The Anarchical Society, p. 4Google Scholar; and Bull and Watson, “Introduction.”

20. Wight, , Power Politics, p. 105Google Scholar.

21. Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., Power and Interdependence (Boston: Little, Brown, 1977)Google Scholar.

22. Buzan, Barry, People, States, and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post–Cold War Era (Hemel Hempstead, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991), pp. 166–74Google Scholar.

23. Tönnies, F., Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft (Leipzig: Fues's Verlag, 1887)Google Scholar.

24. Wight, , Systems of States, p. 33Google Scholar.

25. Ibid., pp. 83–85.

26. Ibid., chap. 5.

27. Watson, The Evolution of International Society.

28. See Mann, Michael, The Sources of Social Power, vol. 1, A History of Power from the Beginning to AD 1760 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), chaps. 3–6 and 8Google Scholar; and Watson, The Evolution of International Society, chaps. 2–4, 6, and 12.

29. Wight, Systems of States, chap. 3.

30. Bull, , The Anarchical Society, pp. 4–5Google Scholar.

31. Watson, , “Hedley Bull, State Systems, and International Studies,” p. 151Google Scholar.

32. Watson, , The Evolution ofInternational Society, p. 14Google Scholar.

33. Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979), p. 93Google Scholar.

34. See Gong, The Standard of “Civilisation “ in International Society; Bull and Watson, Expansion of International Society.

35. Ruggie, John, “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Towards a Neo-Realist Synthesis,” World Politics 35 (1983), pp. 261–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Buzan, Jones, and Little, The Logic of Anarchy, chap. 3.

36. Linklater, Andrew, “Men and Citizens in International Relations,” Review of International Studies 7 (01 1981), pp. 23–37 and especially pp. 34–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

37. Bull, , The Anarchical Society, pp. 151–53Google Scholar.

38. Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics Among Nations, 5th ed. (New York: Knopf, 1978), pp. 17–18 and 24Google Scholar.

39. Bull, , The Anarchical Society, p. 319Google Scholar.

40. Manning, The Nature of International Society, chap. 14.

41. Wight, , “Western Values in International Relations,” pp. 95–97Google Scholar.

42. Mayhew, Leon H., “Society,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 14, 1968, pp. 583–85Google Scholar.

43. See Wallerstein, Immanuel, The Politics of the World-Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984) p. 2Google Scholar; and Mann, , The Sources of Social Power, p. 2Google Scholar.

44. Wæver, Ole, Buzan, Barry, Kelstrup, Marten, Lemaitre, Pierre et al. , Identity, Migration, and the New Security Agenda in Europe (London: Pinter, 1993), especially chap. 2Google Scholar.

45. See Bull, The Anarchical Society, chap. 6; and Bull, , Justice in International Relations, pp. 11–18Google Scholar.

46. Bull, , The Anarchical Society, pp. 315–17Google Scholar.

47. Buzan, People, States, and Fear.

48. Waltz, Theory of International Politics.

49. Watson, , The Evolution of International Society, pp. 13–18Google Scholar.

50. See Waltz, , Theory of International Politics, pp. 114–16Google Scholar; Wight, Systems of States, chap. 1; Wallerstein, Immanuel, “The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 16, no. 4, 1974, especially p. 390CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Mann, The Sources of Social Power, chaps. 4 and 5.

51. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, chaps. 5 and 6.

52. Cited in Gong, , The Standard of “Civilisation,” p. 59Google Scholar.

53. Waltz, Theory of International Politics.

54. Watson, , “Hedley Bull, State Systems, and International Studies,” pp. 151–52Google Scholar.

55. Watson, , “Systems of States,” pp. 100–102Google Scholar.

56. Wight, , Systems of States, p. 135Google Scholar.

57. Bull, , The Anarchical Society, pp. 33–38Google Scholar.

58. Mayall, , Nationalism and International Society, pp. 18–21Google Scholar.

59. Holsti, Peace and War, chap. 5.

60. Bull, , The Anarchical Society, pp. 33–38Google Scholar.

61. Bull, , The Anarchical Society, chap. 9, especially pp. 200–205Google Scholar.

62. James, Alan, “The Equality of States: Contemporary Manifestations of an Ancient Doctrine,” Review of International Studies 18 (10 1992), pp. 377–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63. Holsti, Peace and War, chaps. 2 and 6.

64. Little, Richard, “Deconstructing the Balance of Power: Two Traditions of Thought,” Review of International Studies 15 (04 1989), pp. 87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65. Buzan, Jones, and Little, The Logic of Anarchy, chap. 9.

66. Hurrell, “International Law and the Study of International Regimes.”

67. Ibid.

68. Wæver et al., Identity, Migration, and the New Security Agenda in Europe, especially chap. 4.