Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T03:24:18.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Assignment of Property Rights on the Western Frontier: Lessons for Contemporary Environmental and Resource Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2007

Gary D. Libecap
Gary D. Libecap
Affiliation:
Donald Bren Professor, Corporate Environmental Management, 4412 Bren Hall, Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research Research Fellow, Hoover Institution. E-mail: glibecap@bren.ucsb.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I examine the assignment of private property rights during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries to five natural resources on federal lands in the Far West. Assigning property rights required adaptation from established, eastern practices. The resulting property rights and their long-term welfare effects inform over-fishing, excessive air pollution, and other natural resource and environmental problems. Allocations based on local conditions, prior use, and unconstrained by outside government mandates were most effective in both addressing the immediate threat of open-access and providing a longer-term basis for production, investment, and trade. Initial faulty property allocations and path dependencies are discussed.This is what stretched westward from the 100th meridian, this complex, misunderstood two fifths of the continental United States where men had come before law arrived and where before there were adequate maps there were warring interests, white against Indian, cattleman against sheepman and both against nester, open range notions against the use of the newly invented barbed wire, Gentile against Mormon, land rights against water rights, appropriation rights to water against riparian rights to water, legitimate small settler against speculator and land-grabber. The public domain as Powell knew it was all of these, its only unity the unity of little rain.Wallace StegnerStegner, Beyond the 100th Meridian, p. 218.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 257 - 291
Copyright
© 2007 The Economic History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina Alberto, and George-Marios Angeletos. “Fairness and Redistribution.” American Economic Review 95, no. 4 (2005): 960-80.Google Scholar
Allen Douglas W. “Homesteading and Property Rights; Or, ‘How the West Was Really Won.’” Journal of Law and Economics 34, no. 1 (1991): 1-24.Google Scholar
Alston Lee J. “Farm Foreclosures in the United States During the Interwar Period.” This JOURNAL 43, no. 4 (1983): 885-903.Google Scholar
Alston Lee J., Gary D. Libecap, and Robert Schneider. “Property Rights and the Pre-conditions for Markets: The Case of the Amazon Frontier.” Journal of Insti-tutional and Theoretical Economics 151, no. 1 (1995): 89-107.Google Scholar
Alston Lee J., Gary D. Libecap, and Robert Schneider. “The Determinants and Impact of Property Rights: Land Titles on the Brazil-ian Frontier.” The Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 12, no. 1 (1996): 25-61.Google Scholar
Anderson Terry L., and P. J. Hill. “The Evolution of Property Rights: A Study of the American West.” Journal of Law and Economics 18, no. 1 (1975): 163-79.Google Scholar
Anderson Terry L., and P. J. Hill. “The Race for Property Rights.” Journal of Law and Economics 33, no. 1 (1990): 177-98.Google Scholar
Anderson Terry L., and Ronald N. Johnson. “The Problem of Instream Flows.” Economic Inquiry 24, no. 4 (1986): 535-53.Google Scholar
Anderson Terry L., and Pamela Snyder. Water Markets: Priming the Invisible Pump. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, 1997.
Arnason Ragnar. “A Review of International Experiences with ITQ.” Annex to Future Options for UK Fishing Management, Report to the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, CEMARE, University of Ports-mouth, UK, 2002.
Brewer Jedidiah, Robert Jerome Glennon, Alan Ker, and Gary D. Libecap. “Transfer-ring Water in the American West, 1987-2005.” Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2006.
Burness H. Stuart, and James P. Quirk. “Appropriative Water Rights and the Efficient Allocation of Resources.” American Economic Review 69, no. 1 (1979): 25-37.Google Scholar
Clay Karen, and Gavin Wright. “Order Without Law? Property Rights during the California Gold Rush.” Explorations in Economic History 42 (2005): 155-83.Google Scholar
Coase Ronald. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Econom-ics 3 (1960): 1-44.Google Scholar
Dahlman Carl. “The Problem of Externality.” The Journal of Law and Econom-ics 22, no. 1 (1979): 141-62.Google Scholar
David Paul A., and Gavin Wright. “Increasing Returns and the Genesis of American Resource Abundance.” Industrial and Corporate Change 6, no. 2 (1997): 203-45.Google Scholar
Demsetz Harold. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights.” American Economic Re-view: Papers and Proceedings 57, no. 2 (1967): 347-59.Google Scholar
Dennen R. Taylor. “Cattlemen's Associations and Property Rights in Land in the American West.” Explorations in Economic History 13 (1976): 423-36.Google Scholar
Devine Jennifer A., Krista D. Baker, and Richard L. Haedrich. “Fisheries: Deep-Sea Fishes Qualify as Endangered.” Nature 439 (2006): 29.Google Scholar
Donaldson Thomas. The Public Domain: Its History and Statistics. 47th Congress, 2nd Session, House Misc. Doc 45, Pt. 4. Washington, DC: GPO, 1884.
Doyle Matthew, Rajesh Singh, and Quinn Weninger. “Fisheries Management with Stock Growth Uncertainty and Costly Capital Adjustment: Extended Appendix.” Department of Economics Working Paper, Iowa State University, 2005.
Dunbar Robert G. Forging New Rights in Western Waters. Lincoln: Univer-sity of Nebraska Press, 1983.
Dunbar Robert G.. “The Adaptability of Water Law to the Aridity of the West.” Journal of the West 24 (1985): 57-65.Google Scholar
Ellickson Robert. “Property in Land.” Yale Law Journal 102, no. 6 (1993): 1315-400.Google Scholar
Epstein Richard. “Possession as the Root of Title.” Georgia Law Review 13 (1979): 1221-44.Google Scholar
Ferrie Joseph P. “The Wealth Accumulation of Antebellum European Immigrants to the U.S., 1840-60.” This JOURNAL 54, no. 1 (1994): 1-33.Google Scholar
Fletcher Robert H. Free Grass to Fences: The Montana Cattle Range Story. New York: University Publishers, 1960.
Gates Paul W. History of Public Land Law Development. Washington Public Land Law Review Commission, 1968 reprint. New York: Arno Press, 1979.
Gerard David. “Transaction Costs and the Value of Mining Claims.” Land Eco-nomics 77, no. 3 (2001): 371-84.Google Scholar
Getches David H. Water Law in a Nut Shell. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Co., 1997.
Glennon Robert Jerome. Water Follies: Groundwater Pumping and the Fate of America's Fresh Waters. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2002.
Glennon Robert Jerome, Alan Ker, and Gary D. Libecap. Western Water Data Set, Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2006.
Gordon H. Scott. “The Economic Theory of A Common-property Resource: The Fishery.” Journal of Political Economy 62, no. 2 (1954): 124-42.Google Scholar
Grafton R. Quentin, Dale Squires, and Kevin J. Fox. “Private Property and Economic Efficiency: A Study of a Common-Pool Resource.” Journal of Law and Eco-nomics 43, no. 2 (2000): 679-713.Google Scholar
Gutmann Myron P., and Geoff Cunfer. “A New Look at the Causes of the Dust Bowl.” The Charles L. Wood Agricultural History Lecture Series 99, no. 1 (1999): 1-25.Google Scholar
Hallagan William. “Share Contracting for California Gold.” Explorations in Eco-nomic History 15 (1978): 196-210.Google Scholar
Hansen Zeynep K., and Gary D. Libecap. “The Allocation of Property Rights to Land: U.S. Land Policy and Farm Failure in the Northern Great Plains.” Explorations in Economic History 41 (2004): 103-29.Google Scholar
Hansen Zeynep K., and Gary D. Libecap. “Small Farms, Externalities, and the Dust Bowl of the 1930s.” Journal of Political Economy 112, no. 3 (2004): 665-93.Google Scholar
Hardin Garrett. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162 (1968): 1243-48.Google Scholar
Hibbard Benjamin H. History of Public Land Policies. New York: Macmil-lan, 1924, reissue 1965.
Johnson Ronald N. “Implications of Taxing Quota Value in an Individual Transfer-able Quota Fishery.” Marine Resource Economics 10, no. 4 (1995): 327-40.Google Scholar
Johnson Ronald N., Micha Gisser, and Michael Werner. “The Definition of a Surface Water Right and Transferability.” Journal of Law and Economics 24, no. 2 (1981): 273-88.Google Scholar
Johnson Ronald N., and Gary D. Libecap. “Efficient Markets and Great Lakes Tim-ber: A Conservation Issue Reexamined.” Explorations in Economic His-tory 17 (1980): 372-85.Google Scholar
Johnson Ronald N., and Gary D. Libecap. “Contracting Problems and Regulation: The Case of the Fishery.” American Economic Review 72, no. 5 (1982): 1005-22.Google Scholar
Kanazawa Mark T. “Efficiency in Western Water Law: The Development of the Cali-fornia Doctrine, 1850-1911.” Journal of Legal Studies 27, no. 1 (1998): 159-85.Google Scholar
Kanazawa Mark T.. “The Extralegal Origins of First Possession: Water Law during the California Gold Rush.” Department of Economics Working Paper, Carleton College, 2005.
Klemperer Paul. “What Really Matters in Auction Design.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16, no. 1 (2002): 169-89.Google Scholar
Leal Donald R. Evolving Property Rights in Marine Fisheries. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2005.
Libecap Gary D. “Economic Variables and the Development of the Law: The Case of Western Mineral Rights.” This JOURNAL 38, no. 2 (1978): 338-62.Google Scholar
Libecap Gary D.. “Government Support of Private Claims to Public Minerals: Western Mineral Rights.” Business History Review 53, no. 3 (1979): 362-85.Google Scholar
Libecap Gary D.. Locking up the Range: Federal Land Controls and Grazing. Cam-bridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing, 1981.
Libecap Gary D.. “Bureaucratic Opposition to the Assignment of Property Rights: Overgrazing on the Western Range.” This JOURNAL 41, no. 1 (1981): 151-58.Google Scholar
Libecap Gary D.. Contracting for Property Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Libecap Gary D.. “The Political Economy of Institutional Change: Property Rights and the General Revision Act of 1891.” In Capitalism in Context: Essays on Eco-nomic Development and Cultural Change in Honor of R. M. Hartwell, edited by John James and Mark Thomas, 265-78. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Libecap Gary D.. “Chinatown: Owens Valley and Los Angeles-The Bargaining Costs of the First Major Water Rights Exchange.” Working Paper, Bren School of En-vironmental Science and Management, UCSB, 2006.
Libecap Gary D.. Owens Valley Revisited: A Reassessment of the West's First Great Water Transfer. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, forthcoming, 2007.
Libecap Gary D., and Zeynep K. Hansen. “‘Rain Follows the Plow’ and Dryfarming Doctrine: The Climate Information Problem and Homestead Failure in the Upper Great Plains, 1890-1925.” This JOURNAL 62, no. 1 (2002): 86-120.Google Scholar
Libecap Gary D., and Ronald N. Johnson. “Property Rights, Nineteenth-Century Timber Policy, and the Conservation Movement.” This JOURNAL 39, no. 1 (1979): 129-42.Google Scholar
Libecap Gary D., and Steven N. Wiggins. “Contractual Responses to the Common Pool: Prorationing of Crude Oil Production.” American Economic Re-view 74, no. 1 (1984): 87-98.Google Scholar
Libecap Gary D., and Steven N. Wiggins. “The Influence of Private Contractual Failure on Regulation: The Case of Oil Field Unitization.” Journal of Political Economy 93, no. 4 (1985): 690-714.Google Scholar
Lueck Dean. “The Rule of First Possession and the Design of the Law.” Journal of Law and Economics 38, no. 2 (1995): 393-436.Google Scholar
Lueck Dean. “First Possession.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, Vol. 2, edited by Peter Newman, 132-44. London: Macmillan Press, 1998.
Lueck Dean “The Extermination and Conservation of the American Bison.” Journal of Legal Studies 31, no. 2 pt. 2 (2002): 609-52.Google Scholar
McAfee R. Preston, and John McMillan. “Auctions and Bidding.” Journal of Economic Literature 25, no. 2 (1987): 699-738.Google Scholar
McCurdy Charles. “Stephen J. Field and Public Land Law Development in California, 1850-1866: A Case Study of Judicial Resource Allocation in Nineteenth-Century America.” Law and Society Review 10, no. 2 (1976): 235-66.Google Scholar
McMillan John. “Selling Spectrum Rights.” Journal of Economic Perspec-tives 8, no. 3 (1994): 145-62.Google Scholar
Milgrom Paul. “Auctions and Bidding: A Primer.” Journal of Economic Perspec-tives 3, no. 3 (1989): 3-22.Google Scholar
Morriss Andrew. “Miners, Vigilantes and Cattlemen: Overcoming Free Rider Prob-lems in the Private Provision of Law.” Land and Water Law Review 33, no. 2 (1998): 581-696.Google Scholar
Morriss Andrew. “Lessons from the Development of Western Water Law for Emerging Mar-kets: Common Law vs Central Planning.” Oregon Law Review 80, no. 3 (2001): 861-946.Google Scholar
Morriss Andrew, Roger Meiners, and Andrew Dorchak. “Homesteading Rock: A De-fense of Free Access Under the General Mining Law of 1872.” Environmental Law 34, no. 3 (2004): 745-807.Google Scholar
Myers Ransom A., and Boris Worm. “Rapid Worldwide Depletion of Predatory Fish Communities.” Nature 423 (2003): 280-83.Google Scholar
Osgood Ernest Staples. The Day of the Cattleman. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1929.
Ostrom Elinor. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collec-tive Action. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Peffer E. Louise. The Closing of the Public Domain: Disposal and Reservation Policies, 1900-1950. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1951.
Pisani Donald J. From the Family Farm to Agribusiness: The Irrigation Crusade in California and the West, 1850-1931. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
Powell John Wesley. Report on the Lands of the Arid Region of the United States, 45th Congress, 2nd Session, Executive Document, No. 73. Washing-ton, DC: GPO, 1878.
Raymond Leigh. Private Rights in Public Resources: Equity and Property Alloca-tion in Market-Based Environmental Policy. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 2003.
Reid John. Law for the Elephant: Property and Social Behavior on the Overland Trail. San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1980.
Robbins Roy M. Our Landed Heritage: The Public Domain, 1776-1936. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1942.
Rose Carol M. “Possession as the Origin of Property.” University of Chicago Law Review 52, no. 1 (1985): 73-87.Google Scholar
Rose Carol M.. “Energy and Efficiency in the Realignment of Common-Law Water Rights.” Journal of Legal Studies 19, no. 2 (1990): 261-96.Google Scholar
Sedjo Roger A. A Vision for the U.S. Forest Service: Goals for its Next Cen-tury. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 2000.
Shinn Charles. Mining Camps: A Study in Frontier Government. New York: Scribners, 1948.
Stavins Robert N. “Economic Incentives for Environmental Regulation.” In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, Vol. 2, edited by Peter Newman, 6-13. London: MacMillan, 1998.
Stavins Robert N.. “Market-Based Environmental Policies: What Can We Learn from U.S. Ex-perience (and Related Research)?” Workshop, 23-24 August 2003, Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2003.
Stegner Wallace. Beyond the 100th Meridian: John Wesley Powell and the Sec-ond Opening of the West. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1953.
Stewart James I. “Migration to the Agricultural Frontier and Wealth Accumulation, 1860-1870.” Explorations in Economic History 43 (2006): 547-77.Google Scholar
Stewart James I.. “Cooperation When N is Large: Evidence from the Mining Camps of the American West, 1848-1864.” Department of Economics working paper, Reed College, 2006.
Tietenberg Tom. “Tradable Permits in Principle and Practice.” Workshop, 23-24 Au-gust 2003, Donald Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, 2003.
Umbeck John. “A Theory of Contract Choice and the California Gold Rush.” Journal of Law and Economics 20, no. 2 (1977): 421-37.Google Scholar
Umbeck John. “The California Gold Rush: A Study of Emerging Property Rights.” Explorations in Economic History 14 (1977): 197-226.Google Scholar
Umbeck John. “Might Makes Right: A Theory of the Formation and Initial Distribution of Property Rights.” Economic Inquiry 19, no. 1 (1981): 38-59.Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. The Western Range. 74th Congress, 2d Session, Senate Document 199. Washington, DC: GPO, 1936.
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of the Census. Compendium of the Elev-enth Census: 1890 Part 1 - Population. Washington, DC, GPO, 1892.
United States House of Representatives. Report of the Public Lands Commis-sion. 46th Congress, 2d Session, House Executive Document 46. Washing-ton, DC: GPO, 1880.
United States Senate. Report of the Public lands Commission. 58th Congress, 3rd Session, Senate Document 189. Washington, DC: GPO, 1905.
Webb Walter Prescott. The Great Plains. Boston: Ginn and Company, 1931.
Wiggins Steven N., and Gary D. Libecap. “Oil Field Unitization: Contractual Failure in the Presence of Imperfect Information.” American Economic Review 75, no. 3 (1985): 368-85.Google Scholar
Wright Gavin. “Natural Resource Industries.” In Historical Statistics of the United States, Earliest Times to the Present, Millennial Edition, Volume Four, Part D, “Economic Sectors,” edited by, Susan B. Carter, Scott Signmund Gartner, Michael R. Haines, Alan L. Olmstead, Richard Sutch, and Gavin Wright, 4-275-4-394. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Zerbe Richard O., and C. Leigh Anderson. “Culture and Fairness in the Development of Institutions in the California Gold Fields.” This JOURNAL 61, no. 1 (2001): 114-43.Google Scholar