Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T15:40:35.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Material Adverse Change Clauses and Acquisition Dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2013

David J. Denis  and
Antonio J. Macias
David J. Denis
Affiliation:
djdenis@katz.pitt.edu, Katz Graduate School of Business, University of Pittsburgh, 324 Mervis Hall, Pittsburgh, PA 15260
Antonio J. Macias
Affiliation:
a.macias@tcu.edu, Neely School of Business, Texas Christian University, TCU Box 298530, Fort Worth, TX 76129
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Material adverse change (MAC) clauses are a ubiquitous feature of acquisitions and exhibit substantial cross-sectional variation in the number and types of events that are excluded from being material adverse events (MAEs). MAEs are the underlying cause of 69% ofacquisition terminations and 80% of renegotiations. These renegotiations lead to substantial changes in the price offered to target shareholders. Acquisitions with fewer MAE exclusions are characterized by wider arbitrage spreads during the acquisition period and are associated with higher offer premiums. We conclude that MAC clauses have an economically important impact on the dynamics of corporate acquisitions.

Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , June 2013 , pp. 819 - 847
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, K. A. “A Legal-Usage Analysis of ‘Material Adverse Change’ Provisions.” Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law, 10 (2004), 9–53.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. B Jr.. “The Material Adverse Change Clause.” Practical Lawyer (Oct. 2005), 11–13.Google Scholar
American Bar Association. “First Annual Private Target Mergers & Acquisitions Deal Points Study.” American Bar Association’s Section of Business Law. Committee of Negotiated Acquisitions (2006).Google Scholar
Andrade, G.; Mitchell, M.; and Stafford, E.. “New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2001), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barclay, M. J., and Smith, C. W. Jr. “The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 609–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, T. W., and Lemmon, M. L.. “Breaking Up Is Hard to Do? An Analysis of Termination Fee Provisions and Merger Outcomes.” Journal of Financial Economics, 69 (2003), 469–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, A. L., and Mulherin, J. H.. “Do Termination Provisions Truncate the Takeover Bidding Process?” Review of Financial Studies, 20 (2007), 461–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, A. L., and Mulherin, J. H.. “Do Auctions Induce a Winner’s Curse? New Evidence from the Corporate Takeover Market.” Journal of Financial Economics, 89 (2008), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, K. C., and Raymond, M. V.. “Risk Arbitrage and the Prediction of Successful Corporate Takeovers.” Financial Management, 15 (1986), 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, T. R. “Locking Out Rival Acquirers: The Use of Lockup Options in Corporate Mergers.” Journal of Financial Economics, 60 (2001), 103–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, M. D.; Denis, D. J.; and Denis, D. K.. “Earnouts: A Study of Financial Contracting in Acquisition Agreements.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51 (2011), 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, J. C. IV, and Subramanian, G.. “A Buy-Side Model of M&A Lockups: Theory and Evidence.” Stanford Law Review, 53 (2000), 307–396.Google Scholar
Davidoff, S., and Baiardi, K.. “Accredited Home Lenders v. Lone Star Funds: A MAC Case Study.” Wayne State University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series 08-06 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eicker, F. “Limit Theorems for Regression with Unequal and Dependent Errors.” Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (1967), 59–82.Google Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.. “Industry Costs of Equity.” Journal of Financial Economics, 43 (1997), 153–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, K. P. “Why Some Firms Use Collar Offers in Mergers.” Financial Review, 38 (2003), 127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilson, R. J., and Schwartz, A.. “Understanding MACs: Moral Hazard in Acquisitions.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 21 (2005), 330–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmstrom, B., and Kaplan, S.. “Corporate Governance and Merger Activity in the United States: Making Sense of the 1980s and 1990s.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2001), 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, J., and Ryngaert, M. D.. “Equity Issuance and Adverse Selection: A Direct Test Using Conditional Stock Offers.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, P. J. “The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates under Nonstandard Conditions.” Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (1967), 221–233.Google Scholar
Klein, S. D., and Cooper, A.. Settlement Precludes Ruling in MAC Case, Mergers & Acquisitions Alert. O’Melveny & Myers LLP (2007).Google Scholar
. “The Art of Walking Away from the Deal” (2006).Google Scholar
Macias, A., and Moeller, T.. “Signaling and Risk Allocation in Mergers.” Working Paper, Texas Christian University (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddala, G. S. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, M., and Pulvino, T.. “Characteristics of Risk and Return in Risk Arbitrage.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 2135–2175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, M.; Pulvino, T.; and Stafford, E.. “Limited Arbitrage in Equity Markets.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 551–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, M.; Pulvino, T.; and Stafford, E.. “Price Pressure around Mergers.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 31–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moeller, S. B.; Schlingemann, F. P.; and Stulz, R. M.. “Wealth Destruction on a Massive Scale? A Study of Acquiring-Firm Returns in the Recent Merger Wave.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 757–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon-Peabody. “MAC Survey: A Nixon Peabody Study of Current Negotiation Trends of Material Adverse Change Clauses in M&A Transactions.” DeChiara, D.; R. Porter; and M. Abascal. http://www.nixonpeabody.com/publications_detail3.asp?ID=2474 (2007).Google Scholar
Officer, M. S. “Termination Fees in Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 69 (2003), 431–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Officer, M. S. “Collars and Renegotiation in Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 2719–2743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Economist. “Mergers Delayed: Wait & See” (Sept. 2001).Google Scholar
The Economist. “MAC the Knife. Escape Clauses in Merger Contracts Have Been Thrust into the Spotlight” (Dec. 2001).Google Scholar
The Economist. “Buy Me or I Will Sue” (Nov. 2005).Google Scholar
White, A. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, 48 (1980), 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, K. M., and Moore, C. A.. “In the Wake of the Crunch: Credit Market Turmoil and the Potential Effects on MAC Provisions.” Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (2007).Google Scholar