Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:35:51.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Motions at subcritical values of the Rayleigh number in a rotating fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

G. Veronis
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 39, Mass.

Abstract

A simple analysis is presented for the finite-amplitude, steady motions in a rotating layer of fluid which is heated uniformly from below and cooled from above. The boundaries are considered to be ‘free’ and a solution is obtained for the two-dimensional problem using the eigenfunctions of the stability problem plus the smallest number of higher modes required to represent non-linear interactions. In his analysis of the stability problem Chandrasekhar (1953) concluded that in mercury overstable motions can occur for a value of the Rayleigh number which is as little as 1/67 of the value required for instability to steady motions. In the present paper it is shown that, for a restricted range of Taylor number, steady finite-amplitude motions can exist for values of the Rayleigh number smaller than the critical value required for overstability. The horizontal scale of these finite-amplitude steady motions is larger than that of the overstable motions. A more exact solution to the finite-amplitude problem confirms the above results. The latter solution together with additional physical results will be presented in a later paper.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1966 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chandrasekhar, S. 1953 The instability of layer of fluid heated below and subject to coriolis forces. Proc. Roy. Soc., A 217, 306.Google Scholar
Veronis, G. 1959 Cellular convection with finite amplitude in a rotating fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 5, 401.Google Scholar