Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T07:53:40.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wake curvature and the Kutta condition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

D. A. Spence
Affiliation:
Mathematics Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706

Abstract

The potential problem for the flow at high Reynolds numbers R outside the boundary layer and wake of a thin flat plate at small incidence with allowance for displacement thickness is not fully denned unless the position of the wake is known in advance. The Kutta–Joukowski hypothesis does not provide a satisfactory first approximation to this because of the singularity in curvature of the streamline springing from the trailing edge in inviscid flow, which implies that the initial curvature of the wake in the real flow will be large enough to cause a modification to the potential flow. The net vorticity per unit length in a curved wake is approximately U∞ δ2∞dθ0/ds, where U∞, δ2∞ and dθ0/ds are respectively the undisturbed stream velocity, momentum thickness at infinity and curvature. The outer potential problem is set up with a vortex sheet of this strength to represent the wake, leading to a singular integro-differential equation for θ0(s). From the particular solution we obtain a proportionate correction – (CD/4π) (log4/CD) to the Kutta–Joukowski circulation, where CD is the drag coefficient. For laminar flow this is of order R−½ log (1/R). However, the solution also contains an arbitrary constant which cannot be settled without an examination of the near wake. The recent work of Brown & Stewartson (1970) suggests that this may lead to a term of the lower order $R^{-\frac{3}{8}}$, but depends on the assumption, not supported by the present analysis, that the pressure rise across the wake is o(R−¼).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1970 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, S. N. & Stewartson, K. 1970 Trailing-edge stall. J. Fluid Mech. 42, 561584.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1958 J. Fluid Mech. 4, 383392.
Messiter, A. F. 1970 SIAM J. Appl. Math. 18 (1), 241–257.
Preston, J. H. 1949 Aero. Res. Counc. R & M 1996.
Riley, N. & Stewartson, K. 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 39, 193207.
Spence, D. A. 1954 J. Aero. Sci. 21, 577588.
Spence, D. A. 1956 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 238, 4668.
Spence, D. A. 1961 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 261, 97118.
Spence, D. A. & Beasley, J. A. 1960 Aero. Res. Counc. R & M 3137.
Stewartson, K. 1969 Mathematika, 16, 106121.
Taylor, G. I. 1925 Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A 225, 238245.
Tricomi, F. 1957 Integral Equations. New York: Interscience.
Van Dyke, M. 1964 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Dynamics. New York: Academic.