Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:01:29.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinematical studies of the flows around free or surface-mounted obstacles; applying topology to flow visualization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2006

J. C. R. Hunt
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, and Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge
C. J. Abell
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge Present address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Australia, Adelaide.
J. A. Peterka
Affiliation:
Fluid Mechanics Program, Department of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins
H. Woo
Affiliation:
Fluid Mechanics Program, Department of Civil Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins

Abstract

In flows around three-dimensional surface obstacles in laminar or turbulent streamsthere are a number of points where the shear stress or where two or more component,s of the mean velocity are zero. In the first part of this paper we summarize and extend the kinematical theory for the flow near these points, particularly by emphasizing the topological classification of these points as nodes or saddles. We show that the zero-shear-stress points on the surface and on the obstacle must be such that the sum of the nodes ΣN and the sum of the saddles Σs satisfy \[ \Sigma_N -\Sigma_S = 0. \] If the obstacle has a hole through it, such as a passageway under a building, \[ \Sigma_N -\Sigma_S =-2. \] If the surface is a junction between two pipes, \[ \Sigma_N -\Sigma_S =-1. \] We also consider, in two-dimensional plane sections of the flow, the points where the components of the mean velocity parallel to the planes are zero, both in the flow and near surfaces cutting the sections. The latter points are half-nodes N′ or half-saddles S′. We find that \[ (\Sigma_N +{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}\Sigma_{N^{\prime}}-(\Sigma_{S^{\prime}}+{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}\Sigma_{S^{\prime}}) = 1-n, \] where n is the connectivity of the section of the flow considered.

In the second part new flow-visualization studies of laminar and turbulent flows around cuboids and axisymmetric humps (i.e. model hills) are reported. A new method of obtaining a high resolution of the surface shear-stress lines was used. These studies show how enumerating the nodes and saddle points acts as a check on the inferred flow pattern.

Two specific conclusions drawn from these studies are that:

  1. for all the flows we observed, there are no closed surfaces of mean streamlines around the separated flows behind three-dimensional surface obstacles, which con-tradicts most of the previous suggestions for such flows (e.g. Halitsky 1968);

  2. the separation streamline on the centre-line of a three-dimensional bluff obstacle does not, in general, reattach to the surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1978 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Castro, I. & Robins, A. 1977 The flow around a surface-mounted cube in uniform and turbulent streams. J. Fluid Mech. 79, 307.Google Scholar
Coddington, E. A. & Levinson, N. 1955 Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations. McGraw-Hill.
Counihan, J., Hunt, J. C. R. & Jackson, P. S. 1974 Wakes behind two-dimensional surface obstacles in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 64, 529.Google Scholar
Flegg, G. C. 1974 From Geometry to Topology. English Universities Press.
Furuya, Y. & Miyata, M. 1972 Visual studies on the wake of a roughness element proximate to a wall. Mem. Fac. Engng, Nagoya Univ. 24, 278.Google Scholar
Gaudet, L. & Winter, K. G. 1973 Measurements of the drag of some characteristic aircraft excrescences immersed in turbulent boundary layers. R.A.E. Tech. Mem. Aero. no. 1538.Google Scholar
Gregory, N. & Walker, W. S. 1955 The effect on transition of isolated excrescences in the boundary layer. Aero. Res. Counc. R. & M. no. 2779.Google Scholar
Halitsky, J. 1968 Gas diffusion near buildings. In Meteorology and Atomic Energy, p. 221. U.S.A.E.C.
Legendre, R. 1965 Streamlines in a continuous flow. Recherche Aérospatiale no. 105, p. 3.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1963 In Laminar Boundary Layers (ed. Rosenhead L.), pp. 4888. Oxford University Press.
Maltby, R. L. & Keating, R. F. A. 1962 The surface oil flow technique for use in low speed wind tunnels. AGARDOGRAPH no. 70.Google Scholar
Maull, D. J. & East, L. F. 1963 Three-dimensional flow in cavities. J. Fluid Mech. 16, 620.Google Scholar
Mochizuki, M. 1961 Smoke observations on boundary layer transition caused by a spherical roughness element. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 16, 995.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1964 Viscous and resistive eddies near a sharp corner. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 1.Google Scholar
Monin, A. S. & Yaglom, A. M. 1971 Statistical Fluid Mechanics, vol. 1. M.I.T. Press.
Norman, R. S. 1975 Visualisation of local flow fields using scale models. Proc. 2nd U.S. Nat. Conf. Wind Engng Res., Fort Collins, pp. IV–3–1.Google Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Fairlie, B. D. 1974 Critical points in flow pattern. Adv. Geophys. B 18, 299.Google Scholar
Sharan, V. Kr. 1975 On characteristics of flow around building models with the view of simulating the minimum fraction of the boundary layer. Int. J. Mech. Sci.Google Scholar
Smith, J. H. B. 1972 Remarks on the structure of conical flow. Prog. Aero. Sci. 13, 241.Google Scholar
Smith, J. H. B. 1975 A review of separation in steady, three-dimensional flow. AGARD Conf. Proc. no. 168, paper 31.Google Scholar
Squire, L. C. 1962 The motion of a thin oil sheet under the boundary layer on a body. AGARDOgraph no. 70.Google Scholar
Thwaites, B. (ed.) 1960 Incompressible Aerodynamics. Oxford University Press.
Werlé, H. 1975 Ecoulement décollés: étude phénomenologique à partir de visualisations hydrodynamiques. AGARD Conf. Proc. no. 168, paper 38.Google Scholar
Woo, H. G. C., Peterka, J. & Cermak, J. E. 1976 Wind tunnel measurements in wakes of structures. Colorado State Univ. Rep. CER75-76HGCW-JAP-JEC40.Google Scholar
Yu, C. C. T. 1975 Flow round a square block: measurement of mean and fluctuating pressure; effect of incident turbulence. M.Sc. dissertation, Dept. of Aeronautics, Imperial College.