Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:15:57.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mechanisms of inlet-vortex formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

F. De Siervi ,
H. C. Viguier ,
E. M. Greitzer  and
C. S. Tan
F. De Siervi
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
H. C. Viguier
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
E. M. Greitzer
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
C. S. Tan
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experimental and theoretical study is presented of the inlet-vortex (or ground-vortex) phenomenon. The experiments were carried out in a water tunnel using hydrogen-bubble flow visualization. The theoretical study is based on a secondary-flow approach in which vortex filaments in a (weak) shear flow are viewed as convected (and deformed) by a three-dimensional irrotational primary flow; the latter being calculated numerically using a three-dimensional panel method. Two basic mechanisms of inlet-vortex generation are identified. The first of these, which has been alluded to qualitatively by other investigators, is the amplification of ambient (i.e. far-upstream) vorticity as the vortex lines are stretched and drawn into the inlet. Quantitative calculations have been carried out to illustrate the central features connected with this amplification. I n contrast with what has been supposed, however, there is another mechanism of inlet-vortex formation, which does not appear to have been recognized previously and which does not require the presence of ambient vorticity. It is thus shown that an inlet vortex can arise in an (upstream) irrotational flow, for an inlet in cross wind. In this situation, the vortex is accompanied by a variation in circulation along the length of the inlet. The ratio of inlet velocity to upstream veIocity is an important parameter for both mechanisms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 124 , November 1982 , pp. 173 - 207
Copyright
© 1982 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics, chap. 5. Cambridge University Press.
Bearman, P. W. & Zdravkovich, M. M. 1978 Flow around a circular cylinder near a plane boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 89, 33–47.Google Scholar
Bissinger, N. C. & Braun, G. W. 1974 On the inlet vortex system. NASA CR-140182.
Clutter, D. W., Smith, A. M. O. & Brazier, J. 1959 Techniques of flow visualization using water as the working medium. Douglas Aircraft Co. Rep. ES-29075.Google Scholar
Colehour, J. L. & Farquhar, B. W. 1971 Inlet vortex. J. Aircraft 8, 39–43.Google Scholar
De Siervi, F. 1981 A flow visualization study of the inlet vortex. MIT Gas Turbine and Plasma Dynamics Lab. Rep. no. 159.Google Scholar
Glenny, D. E. 1970 Ingestion of debris into intakes by vortex action. Min. of Tech., Aero. Res. Counc. CP no. 1114.Google Scholar
Greitzer, E. M. 1980 Review — axial compressor stall phenomena. 1980 Trans A.S.M.E. I: J. Fluids Engng 102, 134–151.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, W. R. 1965 Engineering aspects. In Research Frontiers in Fluid Dynamics (ed. R. J. Seeger & G. Temple), chap. 1. Wiley-Interscience.
Hawthorne, W. R. 1967 The applicability of secondary flow analysis to the solution of internal flow problems. In Fluid Mechanics of Internal Flows (ed. G. Sovran). Elsevier.
Hess, J. L. 1972 Calculation of potential flow about arbitrary three-dimensional lifting bodies. McDonnell Douglas Rep. MDC J5679–01.Google Scholar
Hess, J. L. 1974 The problem of three-dimensional lifting potential flow and its solution by means of surface singularity distribution. Comp. Meth. in Appl. Mech. and Engng 4, 283–319.Google Scholar
Hess, J. L., Mack, D. & Stockman, N. O. 1979 An efficient user-oriented method for calculating compressible flow in and about three-dimensional inlets. McDonnell Douglas Rep. no. MDC J7733; also NASA CR-15978.Google Scholar
Hess, J. L. & Smith, A. M. O. 1966 Calculation of potential flow about arbitrary bodies. Prog. Aero. Sci. 8, 1–138.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. T. 1980 A general panel method for the analysis and design of arbitrary configurations in incompressible flows. NASA CR-3079.
Kerwin, J. E. 1967 Variable pressure water tunnel. MIT Dept of Naval Architecure Rep.Google Scholar
Klein, H. 1957 An aerodynamic screen for jet engines. Inst. of Aero Sci. Preprint no. 676; presented at 25th Annual Meeting, 28–31 January 1957.
Kotansky, D. R. 1966 The use of honeycomb for shear flow generation. A.I.A.A. J. 4, 1480–1491.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1956 Drift. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 31–53.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1963 Boundary layer theory. In Laminar Boundary Layers (ed. L. Rosenhead), chap. II. Oxford University Press.
Mattingly, G. E. 1966 The hydrogen-bubble flow visualization technique. David Taylor Model Basin Rep. no. 2146.Google Scholar
Motycka, D. L., Walter, W. A. & Muller, G. L. 1973 An analytical and experimental study of inlet ground vortices. A.I.A.A. Paper no. 73–1313.
Motycka, D. L. & Walter, W. A. 1975 An experimental investigation of ground vortex formation during reverse engine operation. A.I.A.A. Paper no. 75–1322.
Motycka, D. L. 1976 Ground vortex-limit to engine/reverser operation. Trans. A.S.M.E. A: J. Engng Power 98, 258–264.Google Scholar
Newman, W. H. & Atassi, H. 1980 A two-dimensional potential flow model for ground-induced effects on jet and fan inlets. A.I.A.A. Paper no. 80–0388.
Rodert, L. A. & Garrett, F. B. 1953 Ingestion of foreign objects into turbine engines by vortices. NACA TN3330.
Rubbert, P. E. 1977 Subsonic and supersonic panel methods. In Applied Computational Aerodynamics, A.I.A.A. Lecture Series.
Schraub, F. A. et al. 1964 Use of hydrogen bubbles for quantitative determination of time dependent velocity fields in low speed water flows. Rep. MD-10, Thermosci. Div., Dept Mech. Engng, Stanford Univ.Google Scholar
Viguier, H. C. 1980 A secondary flow approach to the inlet vortex flow field. MIT Gas Turbine Lab. Rep. no. 155.Google Scholar