Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:00:10.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Decay of correlations in suspension semi-flows of angle-multiplying maps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2008

MASATO TSUJII*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 812-8581, Japan (email: tsujii@math.kyushu-u.ac.jp)

Abstract

We consider suspension semi-flows of angle-multiplying maps on the circle for Cr ceiling functions with r≥3. Under a Crgeneric condition on the ceiling function, we show that there exists a Hilbert space (anisotropic Sobolev space) contained in the L2 space such that the Perron–Frobenius operator for the time-t-map acts naturally on it and that the essential spectral radius of that action is bounded by the square root of the inverse of the minimum expansion rate. This leads to a precise description of decay of correlations. Furthermore, the Perron–Frobenius operator for the time-t-map is quasi-compact for a Cr open and dense set of ceiling functions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Avila, A., Gouëzel, S. and Tsujii, M.. Smoothness of solenoidal attractors. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 15(1) (2006), 2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Avila, A.. Personal communication, 2005.Google Scholar
[3]Baladi, V.. Positive Transfer Operators and Decay of Correlations (Advanced Series in Nonlinear Dynamics, 16). World Scientific, Singapore, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Baladi, V. and Tsujii, M.. Anisotropic Hölder and Sobolev spaces for hyperbolic diffeomorphisms. Ann. Inst. Fourier 57(1) (2007), 127154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Baladi, V. and Vallée, B.. Exponential decay of correlations for surface semi-flows without finite Markov partitions. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 133(3) (2005), 865874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Bowen, R.. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 470). Springer, Berlin, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Dolgopyat, D.. On decay of correlations in Anosov flows. Ann. Math. 147 (1998), 357390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Gouëzel, S. and Liverani, C.. Banach spaces adapted to Anosov systems. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 26(1) (2006), 189217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Gouëzel, S. and Liverani, C.. Compact locally maximal hyperbolic sets for smooth maps: fine statistical properties. Preprint, 2006.Google Scholar
[10]Hunt, B. R., Sauer, T. and Yorke, J. A.. Prevalence: a translation-invariant ‘almost every’ on infinite-dimensional spaces. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 27(2) (1992), 217238; Addendum Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 28(2) (1993), 306–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Hennion, H.. Sur un théorème spectral et son application aux noyaux lipschitziens. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 118 (1993), 627634.Google Scholar
[12]Ionescu Tulcea, C. T. and Marinescu, G.. Théorie ergodique pour des classes d’opérations non complètement continues. Ann. of Math. (2) 52 (1950), 140147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Liverani, C.. On contact Anosov flows. Ann. Math. 159 (2004), 12751312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Parry, W. and Pollicott, M.. Zeta functions and the periodic orbit structure of hyperbolic dynamics. Astérisque 187–188 (1990).Google Scholar
[15]Pollicott, M.. On the mixing of Axiom A attracting flows and a conjecture of Ruelle. Ergod. Th. & Dynam. Sys. 19(2) (1999), 535548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Ruelle, D.. A measure associated with Axiom A attractors. Amer. J. Math. 98 (1976), 616654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Sinai, Ya. G.. Gibbs measures in ergodic theory. Russian Math. Surveys 27 (1972), 2170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Tsujii, M.. Fat solenoidal attractors. Nonlinearity 14(5) (2001), 10111027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Tsujii, M.. A measure on the space of smooth mappings and dynamical system theory. J. Math. Soc. Japan 44(3) (1992), 415425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar