Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T08:30:50.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The legitimation of international organisations: examining the identity of the communities that grant legitimacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2011

JONATHAN SYMONS
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

‘Legitimacy’ is commonly cited as one of three fundamental mechanisms of social control within both domestic politics and international society. However, despite growing attention to the legitimacy of global governance, little consideration has been given to the identity of the political communities that must grant legitimacy to an international organisation or to the conditions under which legitimacy is valuable for the functioning of that organisation. In raising and responding to these questions, this article rejects the argument that actors must gain legitimacy among all subject social constituencies within their political realm of action. Instead, the importance of legitimacy within a particular constituency is a variable. The article labels this variable a ‘legitimacy nexus’ and outlines five factors that are hypothesised to contribute to calibrating a legitimacy nexus. The plausibility of the proposed schema is explored through discussion of the role of legitimacy in the trade regime and analysis of the origins of the International Labour Organization's anomalous tripartite representative structure.

Type
Research Article
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , December 2011 , pp. 2557 - 2583
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Tim Geithner, ‘Statement by Secretary Tim Geithner at International Monetary and Financial Committee Meeting’, US Department of the Treasury (2009), p. 5.

2 Proposals of this kind are advocated by many normative theorists. Held, David, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (Cambridge: Polity, 1995)Google Scholar ; Macdonald, Terry, Global Stakeholder Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

3 See Rapkin, David and Braaten, Dan, ‘Conceptualising Hegemonic Legitimacy’, Review of International Studies, 35:1 (2009), pp. 117–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

4 This English school term commonly refers to non-state dynamics within the international system (international civil society, mass publics, etc.) and draws attention to potential transcendence of the states-system. Buzan, Barry, From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 2–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

5 Beetham, David and Lord, Christopher, Legitimacy and the EU (LondonLongman, 1998) p. 12Google Scholar , and Clark, Ian, ‘Setting the Revisionist Agenda for International Legitimacy’, International Politics, 44 (2007), p. 328CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Hurrell, Andrew, ‘Legitimacy and the Use of Force: Can The Circle be Squared?’, Review of International Studies, 31:S1 (2005), p. 24Google Scholar ; Keohane, Robert and Buchanan, Allen, ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions’, Ethics & International Affairs, 20:4 (2006), p. 407Google Scholar .

6 Esty, Daniel, ‘The World Trade Organization's legitimacy crisis’, World Trade Review, 1:1 (2002), p. 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

7 Grafstein, Robert, ‘The Legitimacy of Political Institutions’, Polity, 14:1 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Barker, Rodney S., Legitimating Identities: The Self-Presentation of Rulers and Subjects (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001), p. 25CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

8 Hurd, Ian, ‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’, International Organization, 53:2 (1999), p. 380CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

9 Rapkin and Braaten, ‘Conceptualising’, p. 115; Reus-Smit, Christian, ‘International Crises of Legitimacy’, International Politics, 44:2–3 (2007), p. 164CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Suchman, Mark, ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches’, The Academy of Management Review, 20:3 (1995), p. 575CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

10 Beetham, David, The Legitimation of Power (Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 1991), pp. 10–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

11 Steffek, Jens, ‘The Legitimation of International Governance: A Discourse Approach’, European Journal of International Relations, 9:2 (2003), p. 257CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

12 Franck, Thomas M., The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar .

13 Ruggie, John Gerard, ‘Reconstituting the Global Public Domain – Issues, Actors and Practices’, European Journal of International Relations, 10:4 (2004), pp. 511–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Walter, Andrew, ‘NGOs, Business and International Investment: The Multilateral Agreement on Investment, Seattle, and Beyond’, Global Governance, 7 (2001)Google Scholar .

14 Beetham, and Lord, , Legitimacy, p. 12Google Scholar .

15 Clark, ‘Setting’, p. 328.

16 Keohane and Buchanan, ‘Legitimacy’, p. 407.

17 Reus-Smit, ‘International’, p. 164.

18 Ibid., pp. 164–5.

19 Chea, Samnang and Sok, Hach, ‘Cambodia's Accession to the W. T. O. : “Fast Track” Accession by a Least Developed Country’, in Gallagher, Peter, Low, Patrick, and Stoler, Andrew (eds), Managing the Challenges of W. T. O. Participation: 45 Case Studies (World Trade Organization, 2005)Google Scholar .

20 See, for example, Holmes, Leslie, The End of Communist Power: Anti-Corruption Campaigns and Legitimation Crisis (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993) p. 12Google Scholar ; Skocpol, Theda, States and social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979) p. 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

21 Beetham, , Legitimation, p. 30Google Scholar .

22 Steffek, ‘Legitimation’, p. 250.

23 Ruggie, ‘Reconstituting’, p. 519.

24 Seabrooke, Leonard, ‘Legitimacy Gaps in the World Economy: Explaining the Sources of the IMF's Legitimacy Crisis’, International Politics, 44:2–3 (2007), pp. 263–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

25 Eckersley, Robyn, ‘Ambushed: The Kyoto Protocol, the Bush Administration's Climate Policy and the Erosion of Legitimacy’, International Politics, 44:203 (2007), p. 307CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

26 Esty, Daniel, ‘WTO’, World Trade Review, 1:1 (2002)Google Scholar .

27 Esty, ‘The WTO’, p. 13.

28 Ibid., pp. 15–9.

29 Aaronson, Susan A., Taking Trade to the Streets: The Lost History of Public Efforts to Shape Globalization (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

30 Barnett, David and Duvall, Raymond (eds), Power in Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), p. 12Google Scholar .

31 Barnett, and Duvall, , Power, p. 9Google Scholar .

32 Ibid., pp. 9–22.

33 Hurd, Ian, After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the UN Security Council (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2007) p. 5Google Scholar ; Hurd, ‘Legitimacy’, Wendt, , Social p. 88Google Scholar .

34 Hurd, , After, p. 45Google Scholar .

35 The labels ‘validity’ and ‘propriety’ were proposed by Sanford Dornbusch and Richard Scott in developing a theory of authority in organisations. Dornbusch, Sanford M. and Richard Scott, W., Evaluation and the Exercise of Authority (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1975)Google Scholar ; Zelditch, Morris, ‘Processes of Legitimation: Recent Developments and New Directions’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 64 (2001), p. 8CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

36 Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth, ‘The Spiral of Silence a Theory of Public Opinion’, The Journal of Communication, 24:2 (1974), p. 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar . Tocqueville, Citing Alexis, L'ancien Regime Et La Revolution, trans. Michel Lévy frères (Paris: 1856), p. 259Google Scholar .

37 Jawara, Fatoumata and Kwa, Aileen, Behind the Scenes at the WTO: The Real World of International Trade Negotiations (New York: Zed Books 2004), p. 108Google Scholar .

38 Florini, ‘Evolution’, p. 382.

39 Barnett, and Duvall, , Power, p. 12Google Scholar .

40 Hurd, , After, p. 5Google Scholar .

41 Hurd terms this phenomenon ‘validity’: Hurd, Ian, After, pp. 46–47Google Scholar .

42 Clark, Ian, Legitimacy in International Society (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005) p. 4Google Scholar ; Morris Zelditch, ‘Processes’, p. 4.

43 UN Secretary General, ‘Arrangements and practices for the interaction of non-governmental organizations in all activities of the UN system’ (UN, 1998), p. 9 para. 31.

44 Bates, Robert and Lien, Da-Hsiang, ‘A Note on Taxation, Development and Representative Government’, Politics and Society, 14 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

45 Ross, Michael L, ‘Does oil hinder democracy?’, World Politics, 53:3 (2001), p. 332CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; A ‘rentier state’ refers to a state that receives a substantial proportion of revenue from ‘rentier’ profits.

46 Beetham, , Legitimation, p. 30Google Scholar .

47 Beetham, , Legitimation, p. 37Google Scholar .

48 O'Kane, Rosemary H. T., ‘Against Legitimacy’, Political Studies, 41 (1993), p. 484CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

49 Petros C. Mavroidis, ‘Amicus Curiae Briefs before the W. T. O. : Much Ado About Nothing’, Jean Monnet Working Paper 2/01 – New York University School of Law (2001), pp. 1–3.

50 Zelditch, ‘Processes’, pp. 8–10.

51 Bukovansky, Mlada, Legitimacy and power politics: the American and French Revolutions in International Political Culture (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002), p. 31Google Scholar .

52 Bukovansky, , Legitimacy, p. 31Google Scholar .

53 Clark, , Legitimacy, p. 96Google Scholar .

54 Ibid., pp. 95–8.

55 Korey, William, NGOs and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: a Curious Grapevine, first edition (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1998) pp. 31–33Google Scholar ; Jacobson, Harold K., ‘Labor, the UN and the Cold War’, International Organization, 11:1 (1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

56 Abbott and Snidal, ‘Why’, p. 14.

57 Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984), pp. 116–119.Google Scholar

58 Keohane, , After, pp. 111–115Google Scholar .

59 Abbott and Snidal, ‘Why’, pp. 10–11.

60 Cox, Robert, ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method’, in Gill, Stephen (ed.), Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993)Google Scholar .

61 Barnett, David and Finnemore, Martha, Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2004.), p. 7Google Scholar .

62 Cox, Robert W., ‘Labor and Hegemony’, International Organization, 31:3 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

63 Brazil, India and potentially China have possessed increasing influence since the Uruguay Round. Landau, Alice, The International Trading System, Routledge Studies in the Modern World Economy, 48 (New York: Routledge, 2004), pp. 109–124Google Scholar .

64 Ann Capling, M., Australia and the Global Trade System: From Havana to Seattle (Cambridge; Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 118–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

65 Hudec, Robert E., Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System, Thames Essay, 50 (Aldershot, Hampshire, 1987), pp. 39–55Google Scholar .

66 Hudec, , Developing, pp. 39–55Google Scholar .

67 Finnemore, Martha, National Interests in International Society, Cornell Studies in Political Economy (NY.: Cornell University Press, 1996)Google Scholar .

68 Rato, Rodrigo de, ‘The IMF View on IMF Reform’, in Truman, E. M. (ed.), Reforming the IMF for the 21st Century (Washington DC: Institute for International Economics, 2006), p. 131Google Scholar .

69 McRae, Donald, ‘Developing Countries and “the Future of the WTO”’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8:3 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

70 McRae, ‘Developing’.

71 Feng, Hui, The Politics of China's Accession to the World Trade Organization: The Dragon Goes Global (New York: Routledge, 2006), pp. 72–75, 91–112Google Scholar .

72 Feng, , Politics, pp. 157–158Google Scholar .

73 Feng, , Politics, p. 8Google Scholar . Citing F. Zhang, ‘Long Yongtu: Rushi tanpan hua dangnian’ [Long Yongtu: Recalling the WTO Accession Negotiations], Caijing Magazine (29 November 2004).

74 Samnang Chea and Hach Sok, ‘Cambodia's’.

75 Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan, ‘Hard and Soft Law in International Governance’, International Organization, 54:3 (Summer 2000), pp. 421–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Pattberg, Philipp H., ‘The Forest Stewardship Council: Risk and Potential of Private Forest Governance’, The Journal of Environment & Development, 14:3 (2005), pp. 356–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

76 Von Potobsky, Geraldo, Bartolomei de la Cruz, Hector G. and Swepston, Lee, The International Labour Organization: The International Standards System and Basic Human Rights (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1996), pp. 6–7Google Scholar .

77 Alcock, Antony, History of the International Labour Organization (London: Macmillan, 1971), p. 28CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

78 The Labour Commission was composed of representatives from nine states: Belgium, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, France, Italy, Japan, Poland, the UK and the US. The ILO's design evolved from a draft submitted by the British Labour Ministry, ‘Minutes of the Meetings of the commission on International Labour Legislation, February 1 to March 24, 1919’, in Shotwell, James (ed.), The Origins of the International Labour Organization (New York: Columbia University Press, 1934)Google Scholar .

79 Butler, Harold, Confident Morning (London: Faber and Faber, 1950) p. 175Google Scholar ; Kuttig, Ewald, ‘Central Powers and the Labor Proposal’, in Shotwell, (ed.), OriginsGoogle Scholar ; George, David Lloyd, The truth about the peace treaties (London: Gollancz, 1938), p. 8Google Scholar ; Phelan, Edward, ‘The Commission on International Labor Legislation’, in Shotwell, (ed.), OriginsGoogle Scholar .

80 Phelan, Edward, ‘The Labor Proposals before the Peace Conference’, in Shotwell, (ed.), Origins, p. 207Google Scholar .

81 Toye, John, ‘Order and Justice in the International Trade System’, in Foot, Rosemary, Gaddis, John and Hurrell, Andrew (eds), Order and Justice in International Relations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 109Google Scholar .

82 Rosendorff, Peter and Milner, Helen, ‘The Optimal Design of International Trade Institutions: Uncertainty and Escape’, International Organization, 55:4 (2001), p. 831CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

83 Bernstein, Steven F., The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar ; Florini, Ann, ‘The Evolution of International Norms’, International Studies Quarterly, 40:3 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

84 Andrews, John B., ‘Memorandum on American proposals for Labor Agreements at the Peace Conference, submitted to the Inquiry, September 14, 1918’, in Shotwell, (ed.), OriginsGoogle Scholar ; Potobsky, Von, la Cruz, Bartolomei de, and Swepston, , ‘The ILO’, p. 4Google Scholar ; Woolf, Leonard, International Government: Two Reports, second edition (London: G. Allen & Unwin, 1916), p. 186Google Scholar .

85 ‘Manifesto of the International Trade Union Conference at Berne, February 10, 1919, on International Labor Legislation’, in Shotwell (ed.), Origins.

86 Woolf, International.

87 Ibid., pp. 180–5.

88 Ibid., pp. 186, 224.

89 Alcock, , History, p. 19Google Scholar .

90 Cox, W, ‘Labor’, p. 387, Abdul-Karim Tikriti, ‘Tripartism and the International Labour Organization’ (PhD Dissertation, Svenska Institutet för Internationell Rätt: Uppsala University, 1982), p. 125.

91 Cox, ‘Labor’, p. 387.

92 Butler, , Confident, p. 175Google Scholar .

93 George, Lloyd, Truth, p. 648Google Scholar .

94 Walworth, Arthur, Wilson and His Peacemakers: American Diplomacy at the Paris Peace Conference, 1919, first edition (New York: Norton, 1986), p. 317Google Scholar .

95 Tikriti, ‘Tripartism’, p. 73.

96 Wrigley, ‘Trade’, pp. 69–70.

97 Johnson, Graham, ‘Making Reform the Instrument of Revolution: British Social Democracy, 1881–1911’, The Historical Journal, 43:4 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

98 Fairchild, E. C., Arms for the Workers: A Defence of the Programme of the Social-Democratic Party (Twentieth Century Press/Social-Democratic Federation Pamphlets, 1909), pp. 6–7Google Scholar ; Johnson, ‘Making’, p. 70.

99 Brown, Kenneth D., The English Labour Movement 1700–1951 (Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1982), pp. 226–228Google Scholar .

100 Riegelman, Carol, ‘War-time Trade-union and Socialist Proposals’, in Shotwell, (ed.), Origins, pp. 63–69Google Scholar .

101 Alcock, , History, p. 27Google Scholar .

102 Riegelman, ‘War-time’, pp. 70–1.

103 Ibid. p. 75.

104 Ruotsila, Markku, ‘The Great Charter for the Liberty of the Workingman: Labour, Liberals and the Creation of the ILO’, Labour History Review, 67:1 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

105 Delevingne, Malcolm, ‘The Pre-War History of International Labour Legislation’, in Shotwell, (ed.), Origins, pp. 53–54Google Scholar .

106 Henkin, Louis, International Law: Politics and Values (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, 1985), p. 171Google Scholar .

107 Alcock, , History, p. 19Google Scholar .

108 Putnam, Robert D., ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games’, International Organization: 42:3 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar .

109 Helfer, Laurence R., ‘Understanding Change in International Organizations: Globalization and Innovation in the ILO’, Vanderbilt Law Review, 59:3 (April 2006), pp. 652, 720Google Scholar .

110 Helfer, ‘Understanding’, p. 683.

111 Ibid., p. 688.

112 Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendation, (articles 19, 22 and 35 of the Constitution) Report III (Part 1a) (Geneva: International Labor Organization, 2010) pp. 196–7.

113 Cox, ‘ILO’, p. 105.

114 Helfer, ‘Understanding’, p. 688.

115 Cox, ‘ILO’, p. 110.

116 Ibid., p. 111.

117 Ibid., p. 122.

118 Helfer, ‘Understanding’, pp. 717–9.

119 Ibid., p. 706.

120 Ibid., pp. 711–4.