Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:11:17.995Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Extension of the Hajnal–Szemerédi Theorem to Directed Graphs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2014

ANDRZEJ CZYGRINOW
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA (e-mail: aczygri@asu.edu, kierstead@asu.edu)
LOUIS DeBIASIO
Affiliation:
Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA (e-mail: debiasld@miamioh.edu)
H. A. KIERSTEAD
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA (e-mail: aczygri@asu.edu, kierstead@asu.edu)
THEODORE MOLLA
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA (e-mail: molla@illinois.edu)

Abstract

Hajnal and Szemerédi proved that every graph G with |G| = ks and δ(G)⩾ k(s − 1) contains k disjoint s-cliques; moreover this degree bound is optimal. We extend their theorem to directed graphs by showing that every directed graph $\vv G$ with |$\vv G$| = ks and δ($\vv G$) ⩾ 2k(s − 1) − 1 contains k disjoint transitive tournaments on s vertices, where δ($\vv G$)= minvV($\vv G$)d(v)+d+(v). Our result implies the Hajnal–Szemerédi theorem, and its degree bound is optimal. We also make some conjectures regarding even more general results for multigraphs and partitioning into other tournaments. One of these conjectures is supported by an asymptotic result.

Type
Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Chernoff, H. (1952) A measure of asymptotic efficiency for tests of a hypothesis based on the sum of observations. Ann. Math. Statist. 23 493507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Corrádi, K. and Hajnal, A. (1963) On the maximal number of independent circuits in a graph. Acta Math. Hungar. 14 423439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Czygrinow, A., Kierstead, H. A. and Molla, T. (2014) On directed versions of the Corrádi–Hajnal corollary. European J. Combin. 42 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Dirac, G. A. (1952) Some theorems on abstract graphs. Proc. London Math. Soc. 3 6981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Enomoto, H. (1998) On the existence of disjoint cycles in a graph. Combinatorica 18 487492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Enomoto, H., Kaneko, A. and Tuza, Z. (1987) P 3-factors and covering cycles in graphs of minimum degree n/3. Combinatorics 52 213220.Google Scholar
[7] Erdős, P. (1963) Problem 9. In Theory of Graphs and its Applications, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague.Google Scholar
[8] Ghouila-Houri, A. (1960) Une condition suffisante d'existence d'un circuit hamiltonien. CR Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 25 495497.Google Scholar
[9] Hajnal, A. and Szemerédi, E. (1970) Proof of a conjecture of P. Erdős. In Combinatorial Theory and its Applications, Vol. 2, North-Holland, pp. 601623.Google Scholar
[10] Havet, F. and Thomassé, S. (2000) Oriented Hamiltonian paths in tournaments: A proof of Rosenfeld's conjecture. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 78 243273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Keevash, P., Kuhn, D. and Osthus, D. (2009) An exact minimum degree condition for Hamilton cycles in oriented graphs. J. London Math. Soc. 79 144166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Keevash, P. and Sudakov, B. (2009) Triangle packings and 1-factors in oriented graphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 99 709727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Kierstead, H. A. and Kostochka, A. V. (2008) A short proof of the Hajnal–Szemerédi theorem on equitable colouring. Combin. Probab. Comput. 17 265270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Kierstead, H. A. and Kostochka, A. V. (2008) An Ore-type theorem on equitable coloring. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 98 226234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Kierstead, H. A., Kostochka, A. V., Mydlarz, M. and Szemerédi, E. (2010) A fast algorithm for equitable coloring. Combinatorica 30 217224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Kierstead, H. A., Kostochka, A. V. and Yu, G. (2009) Extremal graph packing problems: Ore-type versus Dirac-type. In Surveys in Combinatorics 2009 (Huczynska, S., Mitchell, J. and Roney-Dougal, C., eds), Vol. 365 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, Cambridge University Press, pp. 113136.Google Scholar
[17] Komlós, J. and Sárközy, G. N. and Szemerédi, E. (1996) On the square of a Hamiltonian cycle in dense graphs. Random Struct. Alg. 9 193211.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Kühn, D., Mycroft, R. and Osthus, D. (2011) A proof of Sumner's universal tournament conjecture for large tournaments. Proc. London Math. Soc. 4 731766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Levitt, I., Sárközy, G. N. and Szemerédi, E. (2010) How to avoid using the regularity lemma: Pósa's conjecture revisited. Discrete Math. 310 630641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Linial, N., Saks, M. and Sós, V. T. (1983) Largest digraphs contained in all n-tournaments. Combinatorica 3 101104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Nash-Williams, C. St J. A. (1971) Edge-disjoint Hamiltonian circuits in graphs with vertices of large valency. In Studies in Pure Mathematics (presented to Richard Rado), Academic Press, pp. 157183.Google Scholar
[22] Saks, M. and Sós, V. T. (1981) On unavoidable subgraphs of tournaments. Finite and Infinite Sets, Vol. 37 of Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai, North-Holland, pp. 663674.Google Scholar
[23] Wang, H. (2000) Independent directed triangles in directed graphs. Graphs Combin. 16 453462.Google Scholar
[24] Woodall, D. (1972) Sufficient conditions for cycles in digraphs. Proc. London Math. Soc. 24 739755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar