Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T14:41:46.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining Deer Population Preferences: An Analysis of Farmers, Hunters and the General Public

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

John Curtis  and
Lori Lynch
John Curtis
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Resource Economics Department at the University of Maryland
Lori Lynch
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Resource Economics Department at the University of Maryland
Get access

Abstract

Wildlife managers must consider the public's preferences for wildlife population levels when determining management policies. In 1996, Maryland farmers, hunters and the general public were surveyed to determine their preferences for increasing, maintaining, or decreasing deer population numbers. Using a random utility theoretic framework with an ordered response probit model, the factors that explain preferences such as residential location, socioeconomic characteristics, landscape damage, agricultural yield loss and vehicle accidents were analyzed.

Type
Articles
Information
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , April 2001 , pp. 44 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Argetsinger, A. 1996. “Bows, Arrows and Anger.” The Washington Post. November 3, B1, B8.Google Scholar
Brown, T.L., and Dawson, C.P. No date. “Interests, Needs and Attitudes of New York's Metropolitan Public in Relation to Wildlife.” Natural Resources Research and Extension Series No. 13, Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Brown, T.L., and Dawson, C.P. 1977. “Farmer Willingness to Tolerate Deer Damage in Erie-Ontario Lake Plain.” Department of Natural Resources. Res. and Ext. Serv. #8, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Brown, T.L., and Dawson, C.P. 1978. “Willingness of New York Farmers to Incur White-Tailed Deer Damage.” The Wildlife Society Bulletin 6: 235–239.Google Scholar
Brown, T.L., Decker, D.J., and Hustin, D.L. 1980. “Farmers' Tolerance of White-Tailed Deer in Central and Western New York.” Agricultural Experiment Station #7, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Burkitt, J. 1997. “Hunters Dominate Hearing on Deer Population.” The Washington Post. February 6.Google Scholar
Connelly, N.A., Decker, D.J., and Wear, S. 1987. “Public Tolerance of Deer in a Suburban Environment: Implications for Management and Control.” Third Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference, Gulf Shores, Al. Oct. 19–21.Google Scholar
Conover, M.R., and Decker, D.J. 1991. “Wildlife Damage to Crops: Perceptions of Agricultural and Wildlife Professionals in 1957 and 1987.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 19: 46–52.Google Scholar
Conover, M.R. 1995. “What is the Urban Deer Problem and Where Did it Come From?” Urban Deer: A Manageable Resource, McAninch, J.B., Ed. Proc. of 55th Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference, The Wildlife Society.Google Scholar
Conover, M.R. 1997a. “Monetary and Intangible Valuation of Deer in the United States.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 298–305.Google Scholar
Conover, M.R. 1997b. “Wildlife Management by Metropolitan Residents in the United States: Practices, Perceptions, Costs, and Values.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 306–311.Google Scholar
Conover, M.R., Pitt, W.C., Kessler, K.K., DuBow, T.J., and Sanborn, W.A. 1995. “Review of Human Injuries, Illnesses, and Economic Losses Caused by Wildlife in the United States.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 23: 407–414.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. 1993. “A Bioeconomic Model for Estimating the Optimal Level of Deer Tag Sales.” Environmental and Resources Economics 3: 563–579.Google Scholar
Cornicelli, L., Woolf, J.L., and Roseberry, John L. 1996. “White-Tailed-Deer Use of a Suburban Environment in Southern Illinois.” Trans. of the Illinois State Academy of Science 89: 93–103.Google Scholar
Decker, D.J., Mattfeld, G.F., and Brown, T.L. 1984. “Influence of Experience with Deer Damage on Farmers' Perception of Deer Population Trends.” New York Fish and Game Journal 31: 38–44.Google Scholar
Decker, D.J., Loconti-Lee, K.M., and Connelly, N.A. 1990. “Deer-Related Vehicular Accidents in Tompkins County, New York: Incidence, Costs, and Implications for Deer Management.” Trans. Northeast Sect. Wildlife Society.Google Scholar
Decker, D.J., and Chase, L.C. 1997. “Human Dimensions Approaches to Citizen Input: Keys for Successful Policy.” Conference Proceedings: Deer As Public Goods and Public Nuisance: Issues and Policy Options in Maryland. Center for Agricultural and Resource Policy, University of Maryland. October.Google Scholar
Decker, D.J., and Richmond, M.E. 1995. “Managing People in an Urban Deer Environment: The Human Dimensions Challenges for Managers. Urban Deer: A Manageable Resource, McAninch, J.B., Ed. Proc. of 55th Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference. The Wildlife Society.Google Scholar
Decker, D.J., and Connelly, N.A. 1989. “Motivations for Deer Hunting: Implications for Antlerless Deer Harvest as Management Tool.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 17: 455–463.Google Scholar
Decker, D.J., Sanyal, N., Brown, T.L., Smolka, R.A. Jr., and Connelly, N.A. 1983. “Reanalysis of Farmer Willingness to Tolerate Deer Damage in Western New York.” Proceedings of the First Eastern Wildlife Damage Control Conference, Decker, D.J., Ed. Cornell Cooperative Extension, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Decker, D.J., and Gavin, T.A. 1987. “Public Attitudes Toward a Suburban Deer Herd.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 15: 173–180.Google Scholar
Decker, D.J., and Brown, T.L. 1986. “How Animal Rightists View the ‘Wildlife Management-Hunting System,’” Wildlife Society Bulletin 15: 599–602.Google Scholar
Decker, D.J., Brown, T.L., and Hustin, D.L. 1981. “Comparison of Farmers' Attitudes Toward Deer Abundance in Two Regions of New York Having Different Agricultural and Deer Population Characteristics. New York Fish and Game Journal 28: 202–207.Google Scholar
Decker, D.J., and Brown, T.L. 1982. “Fruit Growers' vs. Other Farmers' Attitudes Toward Deer in New York.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 10: 150–155.Google Scholar
Department of Natural Resources. 1996a. “Deer Tracks: A Survey for Long-Range Planning and Management of White-tail Deer Populations in the State of Maryland.” Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis.Google Scholar
Department of Natural Resources. 1996b. “DNR Initiates Deer Planning Effort.” News release, Public Communications Office, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, December 5.Google Scholar
Doiga, H.E. 1995. “Agency Challenges in Managing Urban Deer.” Urban Deer: A Manageable Resource, McAninch, J.B., Ed. Proc. of 55th Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference. The Wildlife Society.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. 1980. Practical Methods of Optimization, New York, Wiley.Google Scholar
Flyger, V., and Thoerig, T. 1962. “Crop Damage Caused by the Maryland Deer.” Proceedings of the Southeast Association of Game and Fish Commissions 16: 45–52.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. 1993. Econometric Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. 1995. Limdep Users Manual, Version 7.0, Econometric Software Inc. Google Scholar
Hammitt, W.E., McDonald, D.C., and Patterson, M.E. 1990. “Determinants of Multiple Satisfaction for Deer Hunting.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 18: 331–337.Google Scholar
Hay, M.J. 1988a. Net Economic Recreation Values for Deer, Elk and Waterfowl Hunting and Bass Fishing. Report 85–1 (July), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Hay, M.J. 1988b. Net Economic Values of Nonconsumptive Wildlife-Related Recreation. Report No. 85–2 (July), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Heberlein, T.A., Trent, J.N., and Baumgartner, R.M. 1982. “The Influence of Hunter Density on Firearm Deer Hunter's Satisfaction.” Trans. North Amer. Wildlife Natural Resource Conference 36: 665–676.Google Scholar
Hendee, J.C., and Potter, D.R. 1971. “Human Behavior and Wildlife Management: Needed Research.” Trans. North Amer. Wildlife Natural Resource Conference 383–396.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J.J. 1974. “Attitudes and Behavior of Deer Hunters in a Maryland Forest.” Journal of Wildlife Management 38: 1–8.Google Scholar
Loomis, J., Updike, D., and Unkel, W. 1989. “Consumptive and Nonconsumptive Values of a Game Animal: The Case of California Deer.” Trans. 54th N.A. Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. 1990. “Conjoint Analysis of Deer Hunting.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics October. 110–117.Google Scholar
Maddala, G.S. 1983. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McAninch, J.B., ed. 1995. Urban Deer: A Manageable Resource? Proc. of 55th Midwest Fish and Wildlife Conference. The Wildlife Society.Google Scholar
McNew, K., and Curtis, J. 1997. “Maryland Farmers Lose Bucks on Deer-Damaged Crops.” Economic Viewpoint. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland. December.Google Scholar
Messmer, T.A., Cornicelli, L., Decker, D.J., and Hewitt, D.G. 1997. “Stakeholder Acceptance of Urban Deer Management Techniques.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 25: 360–366.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, G.A., Ng, C., and Decker, D.J. 1986. “Summary of Research on Human Tolerance of Wildlife Damage.” Department of Natural Resources Research and Extension Series #25. Cornell University. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Purdy, K.G. 1987. “Landowner's Willingness to Tolerate White-Tailed Deer Damage in New York: An Overview of Research and Management Response.” In Valuing Wildlife: Economic and Social Perspectives, Decker, D.J., and Goff, G.R., Eds. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
Sandt, Joshua. 1997. “A Brief History of Deer in Maryland and the Northeast.” Conference Proceedings: Deer As Public Goods and Public Nuisance: Issues and Policy Options in Maryland. Center for Agricultural and Resource Policy. University of Maryland. October.Google Scholar
Sayre, R.W., Decker, D.J., and Good, G.L. 1992. “Deer Damage to Landscape Plants in New York State: Perceptions of Nursery Producers, Landscape Firms, and Homeowners.” Journal of Environmental Horticulture 10: 46–51.Google Scholar
Stedman, R.C., and Decker, D.J. 1993. “What Hunting Means to Nonhunters: Comparing Hunting-Related Experiences, Beliefs, and Benefits Reported by Hunters and Nonhunters.” HDRU Series No. 93–10. Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Stout, R.J., Knuth, B.A., and Curtis, P.D. 1997. “Preferences of Suburban Landowners for Deer Management Techniques: A Step towards Better Communication.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 15: 348–359.Google Scholar
Stout, R.J., Stedman, R.C., Decker, D.J., and Knuth, B.A. 1993. “Perceptions of Risk from Deer-Related Vehicle Accidents: Implications for Public Preferences for Deer Herd Size.” Wildlife Society Bulletin 21: 237–249.Google Scholar
Swallow, S.K., Weaver, T.W., Opaluch, J.J., and Michelman, T.S. 1994. “Heterogeneous Preferences and Aggregation in Environmental Policy Analysis: A Landfill Siting Case.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 431–443. August.Google Scholar
Tanner, G.P., and Dimmick, R.W. 1984. “An Assessment of Farmers' Attitudes Toward Deer Damage in West Tennessee.” Proc. of the First East. Wildlife Damage Control Conference, Decker, D.J., Ed. Coop. Ext. Dept. Nat. Resources, New York St. Coll. Agric, and Life Sci., Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Waddington, D.G., Boyle, K.J., and Cooper, J. 1994. “1991 Net Economic Values for Bass and Trout Fishing, Deer Hunting, and Wildlife Watching.” U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Interior. October.Google Scholar
Wessells, C.R., Kline, J., and Anderson, J.G. 1996. “Seafood Safety Perceptions and Their Effects on Anticipated Consumption under Varying Information Treatments.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 25: 12–21.Google Scholar
Wheeler, T.B. 1996. “High Passion over the Hunt.” Baltimore Sun. Baltimore, MD. 3:1B,3B. November.Google Scholar