Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T09:33:21.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Sensitive are Crop Yields to Price Changes and Farm Programs?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Jung-Sup Choi  and
Peter G. Helmberger
Jung-Sup Choi
Affiliation:
Korea Rural Economic Institute
Peter G. Helmberger
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin Madison
Get access

Abstract

A two-stage approach is used to estimate sensitivity of corn, wheat, and soybean yields to changes in prices and land idled. Estimated elasticity of demand for fertilizer per acre with respect to expected output price equals 0.47, 0.10, and 0.82 for corn, wheat, and soybeans. Upper estimates of the elasticity of yield with respect to fertilizer equals +0.58, +0.29, and +0.16 for corn, wheat, and soybeans. Yields are found to be quite insensitive to price changes. Fertilizer demands and yields are insensitive to land idled under farm programs.

Keywords

cornfarm programsfertilizer demandssoybeanswheatyields
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , July 1993 , pp. 237 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ash, M. S. “Predicting Yields of Wheat by Class.” Wheat Situation and Outlook. WS282, USDA, ERS, August, 1988.Google Scholar
Ash, M. S. and Lin, W.. “Wheat Yield Response: Policy Implications and Projections.” Wheat Situation and Outlook. WS-275, USDA, ERS, May, 1986.Google Scholar
Berck, P. and Helfand, Gloria. “Reconciling the von Liebig and Differentible Crop Production Functions.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 72(1990) :985–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, O. R. and Worthington, V. E.. “Wheat Acreage Supply Response in the United States.” W. J. Agr. Econ. 13(1988):100–111.Google Scholar
Butell, R. and Naive, J. J.. “Factors Affecting Corn Yields.” Feed Situation. FdS-269, USDA, ERS, May 1978:14–15.Google Scholar
Ericksen, M.H. and Collins, Keith. “Effectiveness of Acreage Reduction Programs.” Agricultural -Food Policy Review: Commodity Program Perspectives. Agr. Econ. Report No. 530, USDA, ERS, July, 1985.Google Scholar
Griliches, Zvi. “Estimates of the Aggregate Agricultural Production from Cross-Sectional Data.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 45(1963):419–432.Google Scholar
Houck, J. P. and Gallagher, P. W.. “The Price Responsiveness of U.S. Corn Yields.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 58(1976):731–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, H. A. and Foster, W. E.. “Commodity Program Slippage Rates for Corn and Wheat.” W. J. Agr. Econ. 15(1990):272–281.Google Scholar
Menz, K. M. and Pardey, P.. “Technology and Corn U. S. Yields: Plateaus and Price Responsiveness.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 65(1983):558–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paris, Q. and Knapp, K.. “Estimation of von Liebig Response Functions.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 71(1989):178–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, R.K. and Heady, E.O.. “Fertilizer Demand Functions for Specific Nutrients Applied to Three Major U.S. Crops.” W. J. Agr. Econ. 7(1982):265–277.Google Scholar