Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-15T22:02:28.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disentangling intra-kinship property rights in land: a contribution of economic ethnography to land economics in Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2008

JEAN-PHILIPPE COLIN
JEAN-PHILIPPE COLIN*
Affiliation:
IRD, UMR MOISA, F-34060 Montpellier, France
*
Correspondence to: Jean-Philippe Colin, IRD, UMR MOISA, F-34060 Montpellier. Email: colin@supagro.inra.fr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The issue of property rights in land has taken central stage in research in institutional economics regarding developing countries. In the African context, numerous studies have dealt with the individualization and commodification of customary land rights. The issue of intra-family land rights tends however to remain a black box, regarding the content of the bundle of rights and duties, the identification of the right holders and the transfers of rights within the family. Drawing from the insights of institutional economics as well as economic and legal anthropology, this paper presents a conceptual framework to rigorously explore the issue of land rights through an economic ethnography.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , August 2008 , pp. 231 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amanor, K. S. 2001, Land, Labour and the Family in Southern Ghana: A Critique of Land Policy under Neo-Liberalisation, Uppsala: The Nordic Africa Institute.Google Scholar
Ancey, G. 1975, ‘Niveaux de décision et fonctions objectif en milieu rural africain’, Note AMIRA 3, Paris.Google Scholar
Appell, G. 1983, ‘Methodological Problems with the Concepts of Corporation, Corporate Social Grouping, and Cognatic Descent Group’, American Ethnologist, 10 (2): 302–311.Google Scholar
Benda-Beckmann (von), F., von Benda-Beckmann, K., and Wiber, M. (2006, ‘The Properties of Property’, in von Benda-Beckmann, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K., and Wiber, M. (eds), Changing Properties of Property, New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Benjaminsen, T. and Lund, C. 2003, Securing Land Rights in Africa, London: Frank Cass & Co.Google Scholar
Berry, S. 1993, No Condition is Permanent: The Social Dynamics of Agrarian Change in Sub-Saharan Africa, Madison: The University Press of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Berry, S. 2002, ‘Debating the land question in Africa’, Comparative Study of Society and History, 44: 638–668.Google Scholar
Biebuyck, D. 1964, ‘Land Holding and Social Organisation’, in Herskovits, M. and Harwitz, M. (eds), Economic Transition in Africa, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 99–112.Google Scholar
Bromley, D. 1989, Economic Interests and Institutions: The Conceptual Foundations of Public Policy, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. and Migot-Adholla, S. (eds) 1994, Searching for Land Tenure Security in Africa, Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Carter, M. and Katz, E. 1997, ‘>Separate Spheres and the Conjugal Contract: Understanding the Impact of Gender-Biaised Development’, in Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J., and Alderman, H. (eds), Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries: Models, Methods, and Policy, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 95–111.Google Scholar
Chauveau, J.-P. 2006, ‘How Does an Institution Evolve? Land, Politics, Intergenerational Relations and the Institution of the Tutorat amongst Autochtones and Immigrants (Gban region, Côte d'Ivoire)’, in Kuba, R. and Lentz, C. (eds), Land and the Politics of Belonging in West Africa, Boston: Brill, pp. 213–240.Google Scholar
Chauveau, J.-P. 2005, ‘Les rapports entre générations ont une histoire: Accès à la terre et gouvernementalité locale en pays gban (Centre-Ouest de la Côte d'Ivoire)’, Afrique Contemporaine, 214: 59–83.Google Scholar
Chauveau, J.-P., Colin, J.-Ph., Jacob, J.-P., Lavigne Delville, Ph., and Le Meur, P.-Y. 2006, Changes in Land Access and Governance in West Africa: Markets, Social Mediations and Public Policies, Results of the CLAIMS Research Project, London: IIED/DFID.Google Scholar
Colin, J.-Ph. and Ayouz, M. 2006, ‘The Development of a Land Market? Insights from Côte d'Ivoire’, Land Economics, 82 (3): 404–423.Google Scholar
Colin, J.-Ph., Kouamé, G., and Soro, D. 2007, ‘Outside the Autochthon-Migrant Configuration: Access to Land, Land Conflicts and Inter-Ethnic Relationships in Lower Côte d'ivoire’, Journal of Modern African Studies, 45 (1): 33–59.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J. and Roberts, S. 1981, Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Deininger, K. 2003, Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction, A World Bank Policy Research Report, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deininger, K. and Feder, G. 2001, ‘Land Institutions and Land Markets’, in Gardner, R. and Rausser, G. (eds), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, vol. IA, North-Holland, Elsevier, pp. 287–331.Google Scholar
De Janvry, A., Gordillo, G., Platteau, J.-Ph., and Sadoulet, E. (eds) 2001, Access to Land, Rural Poverty and Public Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. 1967, ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights’, American Economic Review, 57: 347–359.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. 1986, How Institutions Think, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Dey Abbas, J. 1997, ‘Gender Asymmetries in Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Some Policy Implications for Land and Labor Productivity’, in Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J., and Alderman, H. (eds), Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 249–262.Google Scholar
Fafchamps, M. 2001, ‘Intrahousehold Access to Land and Sources of Inefficiency: Theory and Concepts’, in de Janvry, A., Gordillo, G., Platteau, J.-Ph., and Sadoulet, E. (eds), Access to Land, Rural Poverty and Public Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 68–96.Google Scholar
Gastellu, J.-M. 1978/1980, ‘Mais où sont donc ces unités économiques que nos amis cherchent tant en Afrique?’, Cahiers ORSTOM des Sciences Humaines, 28 (1–2): 3–11.Google Scholar
Goody, J. (ed) 1958, The Developmental Cycle in Domestic Groups, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gouldner, A. 1960, ‘The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement’, American Sociological Review, 25: 161–178.Google Scholar
Gray, R. 1964, ‘Introduction’, in Gray, R. and Gulliver, P. H. (eds), The Family Estate in Africa: Studies in the Role of Property in Family Structure and Lineage Continuity, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar
Gray, L. and Kevane, M. 1999, ‘Diminished Access, Diverted Exclusion: Women and Land Tenure in Sub-Saharan Africa’, African Studies Review, 42 (2): 15–39.Google Scholar
Guyer, J. 1981, ‘Household and Community in African Studies’, African Studies Review, 24 (2–3): 87–134.Google Scholar
Guyer, J. and Peters, P. (eds) 1987, ‘Introduction’, special issue ‘Conceptualizing the Household. Issues in Theory and Policy in Africa’, Development and Change, 2 (18): 197–213.Google Scholar
Hallowell, I. 1943, ‘The Nature and Function of Property as a Social Institution’, Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1 (April): 115–138.Google Scholar
Hill, P. 1963, The Migrant Cocoa-farmers of Southern Ghana: A Study in Rural Capitalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. 1988, Economics and Institutions: A Manifesto for a Modern Institutional Economics, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hoebel, E. A. 1954, The Law of Primitive Man: A Study in Comparative Legal Dynamics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hoefeld, W. 1913, ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’, Yale Law Journal, 23 (1): 16–59.Google Scholar
Juul, C. and Lund, C. (eds) 2002, Negotiating property in Africa, Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Koopman, J. 1991, ‘Neoclassical Household Models and Modes of Household Production: Problems in the Analysis of African Agricultural Households’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 23 (3–4): 148–173.Google Scholar
Lastarria-Cornhiel, S. 1997, ‘Impact of Privatization on Gender and Property Rights in Africa’, World Development, 25 (8): 1317–1333.Google Scholar
Lavigne, Delville Ph. forthcoming, ‘Reconnaître les droits coutumiers: propriété coutumière ou faisceaux de droits? Cadres cognitifs, conception des droits et faisabilité politique de l'enregistrement des droits fonciers en Afrique de l'Ouest’, in Colin, J.-Ph., Le Meur, P.-Y., and Léonard, E. (eds), Les politiques d'enregistrement des droits fonciers: du cadre légal aux pratiques locales, Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Libecap, G. 1989, Contracting for Property Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F. 1978/2000, Law as Process, Hambourg and London: LIT and James Carrey.Google Scholar
Moore, S. F. 1987, ‘Explaining the Present: Theoretical Dilemmas in Processual Ethnography’, American Ethnologist, 14: 727–736.Google Scholar
Okoth-Ogendo, H. W. 1989, ‘Some Issues of Theory in Study of Tenure Relations in African Agriculture’, Africa, 59 (1): 6–17.Google Scholar
Peters, P. 2004, ‘Inequality of Social Conflict Over Land in Africa’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 4 (3): 269–314.Google Scholar
Platteau, J. P. 1996, ‘The Evolutionary Theory of Land Rights as Applied to Sub-Saharan Africa: A Critical Assessment’, Development and Change, 27 (1): 29–86.Google Scholar
Pollak, R. 1985, ‘A Transaction Cost Approach to Families and Households’, Journal of Economic Literature, 23 (June): 581–608.Google Scholar
Quisumbing, A., Payongayong, E., Aidoo, J. B., and Otsuka, K. 2001, ‘Women's Land Rights in the Transition to Individualized Ownership: Implications for Tree-Resource Management in Western Ghana’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 50 (1): 157–181.Google Scholar
Ribot, J. C. and Peluso, N. 2003, ‘A Theory of Access’, Rural Sociology, 68 (2): 153–181.Google Scholar
Richards, P. 2005, ‘To Fight or to Farm? Agrarian Dimensions of the Mano River Conflicts (Liberia and Sierra Leone)’, African Affairs, 104/417: 571–590Google Scholar
Schlager, E. and Ostrom, E. 1992, ‘Property Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis’, Land Economics, 68 (3): 249–262.Google Scholar
Schmid, A. 1987, Property, Power, and Public Choice: An Inquiry into Law and Economics, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Shipton, P. and Goheen, M. 1992, ‘Understanding African Land-Holding: Power, Wealth, and Meaning’, Africa, 62 (3): 307–325.Google Scholar
Soro, D. and Colin, J.-Ph. forthcoming, ‘Institution familiale, marchandisation et individualisation des droits sur la terre: Une lecture à partir du cas d'une communauté de migrants sénoufo en basse Côte d'Ivoire’, Economie rurale.Google Scholar
Udry, C. 1996, ‘Gender, Agricultural Production, and the Theory of the Household’, Journal of Political Economy, 104 (5): 1010–1046.Google Scholar
Velsen (van), J. 1979, ‘The Extended-case Method and Situational Analysis’, in Epstein, A.L. (ed.), The Craft of Social Anthropology, Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 129–149.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. and Tsikata, D. 2003, ‘Policy Discourses on Women's Land Rights in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Implication of the Re-Turn to the Customary’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 3 (1–2): 67–112.Google Scholar
Wilk, R. and Netting, R. McM. 1984, ‘Households: Changing Forms and Functions’, in Netting, R. McC., Wilk, R., and Arnould, E. (eds), Households: Comparative and Historical Studies of the Domestic Group, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Yanagisako, S. 1979, ‘Family and Household: The Analysis of Domestic Groups’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 8: 161–205.Google Scholar
Yngstrom, I. 2002, ‘Women, Wives and Land Rights in Africa: Situating Gender Beyond the Households in the Debate Over Land Policy and Changing Tenure Systems’, Oxford Development Studies, 30 (1): 21–40.Google Scholar