Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:13:08.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating human rights in emerging regulation of Corporate Social Responsibility: the EU case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2011

Karin Buhmann
Karin Buhmann*
Affiliation:
Institute of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
*
buhmann@life.ku.dk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyses the EU Commission's policy-based approach to regulating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and the role of international human rights law as a normative source for the regulatory output in two initiatives launched in 2002 and 2006. The article argues as a starting point that the understanding of CSR as ‘beyond law’ tends to shroud the contributions that international human rights law and legal theory based regulatory technique lend to CSR normativity and regulation, not only outside the EU but also within. The EU experience shows that due to power relations and their impact on multi-stakeholder negotiations and their outcome, this potential does necessarily unfold. It also shows that the procedural design of reflexive multi-stakeholder regulatory processes is significant for bringing forth the normative contributions of international law to CSR in public–private regulation. Finally, the article suggests that within the public policy context in which EU CSR regulation is emerging, the normative role of international human rights law which the Commission suggests for CSR in Europe and the application of the reflexive regulatory technique contribute to a substantive as well as procedural juridification of CSR, especially in the formative stage of defining CSR normativity. The latter adds a significant new perspective to the understanding of CSR and its relation to law, although it need not conflict with the understanding of CSR being ‘voluntary’ in the sense of action beyond direct legal obligations.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 139 - 179
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Carol A. (2002) ‘Internal Organisational Factors Influencing Corporate Social and Ethical Reporting Beyond Current Theorising’, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal 15: 223–50.Google Scholar
Addo, Michael K. (1999) Human Rights Standards and the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Alston, Philip and Weiler, Joseph H. H. (2004) ‘An “Ever Closer Union” in Need of a Human Rights Policy: The European Union and Human Rights’ in Alston, Philip (ed.) The EU and Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press, 3–66.Google Scholar
Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm (2003) Discourse Analytical Strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. Bristol: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arat, Zehra F. Kabasakal (2006) ‘Forging a Global Culture of Human Rights: Origins and Prospects of the International Bill of Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly 28: 416–37.Google Scholar
Arthurs, Harry (2008) ‘Corporate Self-Regulation: Political Economy, State Regulation and Reflexive Labour Law’, in Bercusson, Brian and Estlund, Cynthia (eds), Regulating Labour in the Wake of Globalisation. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart, 19–35.Google Scholar
Berle, Adolph A. Jr. (1931) ‘Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust’, Harvard Law Review 44: 1049–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhmann, Karin (2005) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility in China: Current Issues and Possible Relevance for Implementation of Law’, Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 22: 62–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhmann, Karin (2009) ‘Regulating Corporate Social and Human Rights Responsibilities at the UN Plane: Institutionalising New Forms of Law and Law-making Approaches?’, Nordic Journal of International Law 78: 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhmann, Karin (2010) ‘Balancing Interests in Public–Private CSR-Schemes: The Global Compact and the EU's Multi-Stakeholder Forum on CSR’ in Karin Buhmann, Mette Morsing and Roseberry, Lynn (eds), Corporate Social and Human Rights Responsibilities: Global Legal and Management Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 77–107.Google Scholar
Buhmann, Karin (2011) ‘Reflexive Regulation of CSR to Promote Sustainability: Understanding EU Public–Private Regulation on CSR through the Case of Human Rights’, forthcoming in The International and Comparative Corporate Law Journal, January 2011.Google Scholar
Carroll, Archie B. (1979) ‘A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance’, The Academy of Management Review 4: 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Archie B. (1991) ‘The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholder’, Business Horizons July/August: 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, Geoffrey (2008) ‘Business and Human Rights - A Personal Account from the Front Line’, Ethical Corporation 11 February 2008, <www.ethicalcorp.com/content.asp?ContentID=5695> (last accessed 25 February 2011).Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew (2006) Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collin, Finn (2003) Konstruktivisme. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur/Roskilde Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Commission (2001a) Commission of the European Communities: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. EU Doc. COM(2001)366.Google Scholar
Commission (2001b) Commission of the European Communities: A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development. EU Doc. COM(2001)264 final.Google Scholar
Commission (2001c) Commission of the European Communities: European Governance: A White Paper. EU Doc. COM(2001)428 final.Google Scholar
Commission (2002) Commission of the European Communities: Corporate Social Responsibility: A Business Contribution to Sustainable Development. EU Doc. COM(2002)347.Google Scholar
Commission (2006a) Commission of the European Communities: Implementing the Partnership for Growth and Jobs: Making Europe a Pole of Excellence on Corporate Social Responsibility. EU Doc. COM(2006)136.final.Google Scholar
Commission (2006b) Commission of the European Communities: Promoting Decent Work for All: The EU Contribution to the Implementation of the Decent Work Agenda in the World. EU Doc. COM(2006)249.Google Scholar
Commission (2006c) Commission of the European Communities: CSR Forum Recommendations: Progress Review. Compendium of actions by European Commission (December 2006).Google Scholar
Commission (2006d) Commission of the European Communities: Press release 22 March 2006. EU Doc. IP/OC/358.Google Scholar
Conley, John M. and Williams, Cynthia A. (2005) ‘Engage, Embed and Embellish: Theory Versus Practice in the Corporate Social Responsibility Movement’, Journal of Corporation Law 31: 1–38.Google Scholar
Coordination Committee (2003) Joint Proposal for a Final Report Format from the Coordination Committee. UNICE, ETUC, European Platform of Social NGOs, Green 8, CSR Europe (28 October 2003) <http://forum.europa.eu.int/irc/empl/csr_eu_multi_stakeholder_forum/info/data/en/CSR%20Forum%20031113%20report%20structure.htm> (last accessed 30 November 2010).+(last+accessed+30+November+2010).>Google Scholar
Council of the European Union (2005) Conclusions–Council of the European Union, 23 March 2005, EU Doc. 7619/1/05 REV 1.Google Scholar
Crane, Andrew, Matten, Dirk and Spence, Laura J. (2008) Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deakin, Simon (2005) ‘Social Rights in a Globalised Economy’ in Alston, Philip (ed.), Labour Rights as Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press, 25–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deakin, Simon and Hobbs, Richard (2007) ‘False Dawn for CSR? Shifts in Regulatory Policy and the Response of the Corporate and Financial Sectors in Britain’, Corporate Governance 15: 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodd, E. Merrick Jr. (1932) ‘For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?’, Harvard Law Review 45: 1145–63.Google Scholar
Elkington, John (1998) Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
EU Multi-stakeholder Forum on CSR (2002a) High Level meeting 16 October 2002, Objectives & Mandate, <http://forum.europa.eu.int/irc/empl/csr_eu_multi_stakeholder_forum/info/data/en/CSR%20Forum%20Rules.htm> (last accessed 30 November 2010).+(last+accessed+30+November+2010).>Google Scholar
EU Multi-stakeholder Forum on CSR (2002b) High Level meeting 16 October 2002, Composition, <http://forum.europa.eu.int/irc/empl/csr_eu_multi_stakeholder_forum/info/data/en/CSR%20Forum%20Rules.htm> (last accessed 30 November 2010).+(last+accessed+30+November+2010).>Google Scholar
EU Multi-stakeholder Forum on CSR (2002c), High Level meetings, 1st High level meeting, minutes, <http://circa.europa.eu/irc/empl/csr_eu_multi_stakeholder_forum/info/data/en/CSR%20Forum%20021016%20minutes.htm> (last accessed 30 November 2010).+(last+accessed+30+November+2010).>Google Scholar
EU Multi-stakeholder Forum on CSR (2003), High Level meetings, High Level meeting 13 November 2003, Minutes, <http://forum.europa.eu.int/irc/empl/csr_eu_multi_stakeholder_forum/info/data/en/CSR%20Forum%20031113%20minutes.htm> (last accessed 30 November 2010).+(last+accessed+30+November+2010).>Google Scholar
EU Multi-stakeholder Forum on CSR (2004), High Level meetings, Final High Level meeting 27 June 2004, Minutes. <http://forum.europa.eu.int/irc/empl/csr_eu_multi_stakeholder_forum/info/data/en/CSR%20Forum%20040629%20minutes.htm> (last accessed 30 November 2010).+(last+accessed+30+November+2010).>Google Scholar
EU Multi-stakeholder Forum on CSR (2004 – Final Report) Final Results and recommendations. 29 June 2004. <http://forum.europa.eu.int/irc/empl/csr_eu_multi_stakeholder_forum/info/data/en/CSR%20Forum%20final%20report.pdf> (last accessed 30 November 2010).+(last+accessed+30+November+2010).>Google Scholar
EU Multi-stakeholder Forum on CSR (2009) 10 February 2009, Panel 1: The global dimension of CSR (1): European added-value in global CSR processes and instruments, <http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/csr/documents/stakeholder_forum/p1_international_processes.pdf> (last accessed 25 March 2009).+(last+accessed+25+March+2009).>Google Scholar
Euractiv (2006) EurActiv Social Europe, 23 March 2006.Google Scholar
European Alliance for CSR (2008) Progress Review 2007. Brussels, 4 March 2008.Google Scholar
European Parliament (1999) EU Doc. EP Resolution A4-0508/98, adopted on 15 January 1999.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (2001) ‘Critical Discourse Analysis as a Method in Social Scientific Research’ in Wodak, Ruth and Meyer, M. (eds), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publications, 121–38.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
FIDH (2004) Statement by the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) at the MSF on CSR, Final High Level meeting, 27 June 2004, <http://forum.europa.eu.int/irc/empl/csr_eu_multi_stakeholder_forum/info/data/en/CSR%20Forum%20040629%20speech%20FIDH.htm> (last accessed 30 November 2010).+(last+accessed+30+November+2010).>Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton (1970) ‘The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits’, New York Times Magazine, 13 September 1970, p. 32.Google Scholar
G8 (2007) Growth and Responsibility in the World Economy, G8 Summit Declaration, 7 June 2008, at para. 24 <www.g-8.de/Content/EN/Artikel/__g8-summit/anlagen/2007-06-07-gipfeldokument-wirtschaft-eng,templateId=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf/2007-06-07-gipfeldokument-wirtschaft-eng.pdf> (last accessed 30 November 2010).+(last+accessed+30+November+2010).>Google Scholar
Hajer, Maarten A. (1995) The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. New York and Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Herberg, Martin (2008) ‘Global Legal Pluralism and Interlegality: Environmental Self-Regulation in Multinational Enterprises as Global Law-Making’ in Dilling, Olaf, Herberg, Martin and Winter, Gerd (eds), Responsible Business: Self-Governance and Law in Transnational Economic Transactions. Oxford and Portland OR: Hart Publishing, 17–40.Google Scholar
Hess, David (1999) ‘Social Reporting: A Reflexive Law Approach to Corporate Social Responsiveness’, Journal of Corporation Law 25: 41–84.Google Scholar
Hess, David (2008) ‘The Three Pillars of Corporate Social Reporting as New Governance Regulation: Disclosure, Dialogue and Development’, Business Ethics Quarterly 18: 447–82.Google Scholar
Hess, David and Warren, Danielle E. (2008) ‘The Meaning and Meaningfulness of Corporate Social Initiatives’, Business and Society Review 113: 163–97.Google Scholar
Holdgaard, Rass (2008) Legal Reasoning and Legal Discourses: External Relations Law of the European Community. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Michael (2006) ‘Commentary: What is Corporate Social Responsibility All About?’, Journal of Public Affairs 6: 298–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Council (2008) Mandate of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises. Human Rights Council Resolution 8/7, 18 June 2008.Google Scholar
Jägers, Nicola (2002) Corporate Human Rights Obligations: In Search of Accountability. Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David (1987) ‘The Sources of International Law’, American University Journal of Law & Policy 2: 1–96.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Steward, Richard B. (2005) ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, Law and Contemporary Problems 68: 15–61.Google Scholar
Kjær, Anne Lise (2002) ‘Når retskulturer mødes: Dansk identitet og europæisk integration. En tværfaglige, rets- og sprogvidenskabelig analyse af dansk rets møde med europæisk ret [When legal cultures meet: Danish identity and European integration. An interdisciplinary, legal and linguistic analysis of the Danish law's meeting with European law]’, in Bentzon, Agnete W., Bjørst, Byriel and Koch, Henning (eds), Retskulturer. Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets forlag, 9–23.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti (1989) From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers' Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Koudiadaki, Aristea (2009) ‘Information and Consultation Rights of Employees in Britain’, International Journal of Law in Context 5: 393–416.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico and Kingsbury, Benedict (2006) ‘Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order’, European Journal of International Law 17: 1–13.Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf (2009) ‘State Responsibility and the Primary–Secondary Rules Terminology – The Role of Language for an Understanding of the International Legal System’, Nordic Journal of International Law 78: 53–72.Google Scholar
Lisbon European Council (2000), Conclusions, 23 and 24 March 2000, available at <http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/00100-r1.en0.htm> (last accessed 18 December 2010).+(last+accessed+18+December+2010).>Google Scholar
Lobel, Orly (2005) ‘The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought’, Minnesota Law Review 89: 262–390.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Sorcha (2007) ‘Reconciling Regulatory Approaches to Corporate Social Responsibility: The European Union, OECD and United Nations Compared,’ European Public Law 13: 671–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, Radu (2006) Institutionalisation of Corporate Social Responsibilities – Synergies between the Practices of Leading Multinational Enterprises and Human Rights Law/Policy. Lund: Faculty of Law, Lund University.Google Scholar
Marrella, Fabrizio (2007) ‘Human Rights, Arbitration and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Law of International Trade’ in Benedek, W., de Feyter, K. and Marrella, F. (eds), Economic Globalisation and Human Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press, 266–310.Google Scholar
McBarnet, Doreen (2007) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility Beyond Law, Through Law, For Law: The New Corporate Accountability’ in McBarnet, Doreen, Voiculescu, Aurora and Campbell, Tom (eds), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 9–58.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, Peter T. (2007) Multinational Enterprises and the Law, 2nd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Neves, Marcelo (2001) ‘From the Autopoiesis to the Allopoiesis of Law’, Journal of Law and Society 28: 242–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, Peter and Frynas, Jedrzej George (2007) ‘Beyond CSR? Business, Poverty and Social Justice: An Introduction’, Third World Quarterly 28: 669–81.Google Scholar
Oosting, D. (2004) Statement by Dick Oosting, Director, Amnesty International EU Office, at the MSF on CSR, Final High Level meeting, 27 June 2004.Google Scholar
Orts, Eric W. (1995a) ‘Reflexive Environmental Law’, Northwestern Law Review 89: 1229–340.Google Scholar
Orts, Eric W. (1995b) ‘A Reflexive Model of Environmental Regulation’, Business Ethics Quarterly 5: 779–94.Google Scholar
Oxford Pro Bono Publico (2009) Corporate Social Responsibility Soft Law Developments in the European Union. Oxford: University of Oxford, 30 July 2009.Google Scholar
Parent, A.-S. (2004) Statement by Anne-Sophie Parent, President of Social Platform, at the MSF on CSR, Final High Level meeting, 27 June 2004, <http://forum.europa.eu.int/irc/empl/csr_eu_multi_stakeholder_forum/info/data/en/CSR%20Forum%20040629%20speech%20Social%20Platform.htm> (last accessed 30 November 2010).+(last+accessed+30+November+2010).>Google Scholar
Perez, Oren (2004) Ecological Sensitivity and Global Legal Pluralism: Rethinking the Trade and Environment Conflict. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Picciotto, Sol (2003) ‘Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 42: 131–52.Google Scholar
Picciotto, Sol (2008) ‘Regulatory Networks and Multi-level Governance’ in Olaf Dilling, Martin Herberg and Gerd, Winter (eds), Responsible Business: Self-Governance and Law in Transnational Economic Transactions. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, 315–41.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ralf (1994) ‘Industrial Relations, Labour Conflict Resolution and Reflexive Labour Law’ in Ralf, Rogowski and Ton, Wilthagen (eds), Reflexive Labour Law: Studies in Industrial Relations and Employment Regulation. Deventer and Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 53–93.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ralf (2001) ‘The Concept of Reflexive Labour Law: Its Theoretical Background and Possible Applications’, in Priban, J. and Nelken, David (eds), Law's New Boundaries: The Consequences of Legal Autopoiesis. Aldershot: Ashgate/Dartmouth, 179–96.Google Scholar
Rogowski, Ralf and Wilthagen, Ton (1994) ‘Reflexive Labour Law: An Introduction’ in Ralf, Rogowski and Ton, Wilthagen (eds), Reflexive Labour Law: Studies in Industrial Relations and Employment Regulation. Deventer and Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 1–19.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John (2004) ‘Reconstituting the Global Public Domain – Issues, Actors and Practices’, European Journal of International Relations 10: 499–531.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John (2007) Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General (SRSG) on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises. UN Doc. A/HRC/4/035, 9 February 2007.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John (2008) Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie. UN Doc. A/HRC/8/5.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John (2010) Guiding Principles for the Implementation of the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, UN Doc. A/HRC/–no date, draft for consultation released on 22 November 2010, Annex B.Google Scholar
Sand, Inger-Johanne (1996) Styring av kompleksitet: Rettslige former for statlig rammestyring og desentralisert statsforvaltniing [Governing complexity: Legal forms for governmental framework regulation and decentralised public administration]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget Vigmostad & Bjørke.Google Scholar
Scheuerman, William E. (2001) ‘Reflexive Law and the Challenges of Globalization’, Journal of Political Philosophy 9: 81–102.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Mark S. and Carroll, Archie B. (2003) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach’, Business Ethics Quarterly 13: 503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Joanne and Trubek, David M. (2002) ‘Mind the Gap: Law and New Approaches to Governance in the European Union’, European Law Journal 8: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senden, Linda (2005) ‘Soft Law, Self-Regulation and Co-Regulation in European Law: Where Do They Meet?’, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law 9(1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Spidla, Vladimir (2006) Discours pronouncé par Vladimir Spidla lors de l'ouverture du Forum Multistakeholder sur la RSE [Speech by Vladimir Spidla at the opening of the Multistakeholder Forum on CSR], 7 December 2006, Hotel Marriott, Bruxelles, <http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/csr/documents/ms_forum_1206/spidla.pdf> (last accessed 17 March 2008). (last accessed 17 March 2008).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Spidla,+Vladimir+(2006)+Discours+pronouncé+par+Vladimir+Spidla+lors+de+l'ouverture+du+Forum+Multistakeholder+sur+la+RSE+[Speech+by+Vladimir+Spidla+at+the+opening+of+the+Multistakeholder+Forum+on+CSR],+7+December+2006,+Hotel+Marriott,+Bruxelles,++(last+accessed+17+March+2008).>Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1983) ‘Substantive and Reflective Elements in Modern Law’, Law & Society Review 17: 239–85.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1985) ‘Corporate Fiduciary Duties and Their Beneficiaries: A Functional Approach to the Legal Institutionalization of Corporate Responsibility’ in Hopt, K. J. and Teubner, G. (eds), Corporate Governance and Directors' Liabilities. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 149–77.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1986) ‘After Legal Instrumentalism?’ in Teubner, Gunther (ed.), Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 111–27.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1993) Law as an Autopoietic System. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Trubek, Louise G. (2006) ‘New Governance and Legal Regulation: Complementarity, Rivalry or Transformation’, Columbia Journal of European Law 13: 1–26.Google Scholar
United Nations (1990) UN Draft Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations. UN Doc. E/1990/94, 12 June 1990.Google Scholar
United Nations (2003) United Nations Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights: Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with regard to Human Rights UN doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2.Google Scholar
Voiculescu, Aurora (2007) ‘The Other European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility–From The Green Paper to New Uses of Human Rights Instruments’ in McBarnet, Doreen, Voiculescu, Aurora and Campbell, Tom (eds), The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 365–96.Google Scholar
Wan, Saiful Wan-Jan (2006) ‘Defining Corporate Social Responsibility’, Journal of Public Affairs 6: 176–84.Google Scholar
Wettstein, Florian (2009) ‘Beyond Voluntariness, Beyond CSR: Making a Case for Human Rights and Justice’, Business and Society Review 114: 125–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilthagen, Ton (1994) ‘Reflexive Rationality in the Regulation of Occupational Safety and Health’ in Rogowski, Ralf and Wilthagen, Ton (eds), Reflexive Labour Law: Studies in Industrial Relations and Employment Regulation. Deventer and Boston: Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, 345–76.Google Scholar
Zerk, Jennifer A. (2006) Multinationals and Corporate Social Responsibility: Limitiations and Opportunities in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar