Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:50:54.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How well are citizens represented by their governments? Issue congruence and inequality in Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2019

Jan Rosset  and
Christian Stecker
Jan Rosset*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Christian Stecker
Affiliation:
Mannheim Center for European Social Research, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
*
*E-mail: jan.rosset@unige.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study analyses congruence across various issues in 16 European democracies. Making use of public opinion and expert survey data, our analyses show that congruence between the policy preferences of citizens and the stances of governments is much more complex than what is revealed by studies focusing on ideology solely. Size and directions of incongruence are larger and more systematic on specific issues than on the left–right scale. On redistribution, citizens are more to the left than their governments, while popular support for European integration is systematically lower among citizens than among their representatives. Moreover, the relatively poor are particularly underrepresented on redistribution, while the preferences of the relatively lower educated are not well reflected in government preferences in relation to European integration. We interpret these results as being partly linked to a representation gap with privileged social groups enjoying higher levels of congruence with their government.

Keywords

congruencepolitical representationpublic opinionEurope
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 145 - 160
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaldering, L. (2017), ‘Political representation and educational attainment: evidence from the Netherlands (1994–2010)’, Political Studies 65: 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J., Ezrow, L., Somer-Topcu, Z. (2011), ‘Is anybody listening? Evidence that voters do not respond to European Parties’ policy statements during elections’, American Journal of Political Science 55: 370–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armingeon, K. and Schädel, L. (2015), ‘Social inequality in political participation: the dark sides of individualisation’, West European Politics 38: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, R., de Vries, C., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M. and Vachudova, M.A. (2015), ‘Measuring party positions in Europe: the Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010’, Party Politics 21: 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, L.M. (2008), Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age, New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Bauer, P.C., Barberá, P., Ackermann, K. and Venetz, A. (2017), ‘Is the left–right scale a valid measure of ideology?’, Political Behavior 39: 553–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belchior, A.M. (2013), ‘Explaining left–right party congruence across European party systems: a test of micro-, meso-, and macro-level models’, Comparative Political Studies 46: 352–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belchior, A.M. and Freire, A. (2013), ‘Is party type relevant to an explanation of policy congruence? Catchall versus ideological parties in the Portuguese case’, International Political Science Review 34: 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernauer, J., Giger, N. and Rosset, J. (2015), ‘Mind the gap. Do proportional electoral systems foster a more equal representation of women and men, poor and rich?’, International Political Science Review 36: 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A. and Bodet, M.A. (2006), ‘Does proportional representation foster closer congruence between citizens and policy makers?’, Comparative Political Studies 39: 1243–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornschier, S. (2010), ‘The new cultural divide and the two-dimensional political space in Western Europe’, West European Politics 33: 419–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnes, N. and Lupu, N. (2015), ‘Rethinking the comparative perspective on class and representation: evidence from Latin America’, American Journal of Political Science 59: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curini, L., Jou, W. and Memoli, V. (2012), ‘Satisfaction with democracy and the winner/loser debate: the role of policy preferences and past experience’, British Journal of Political Science 42: 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusack, T., Iversen, T. and Rehm, P. (2006), ‘Risks at work: the demand and supply sides of government redistribution’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22: 365–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1971), Polyarchy, Participation and Opposition, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. (1989), Democracy and its Critics, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, R.J. (1985), ‘Political parties and political representation: party supporters and party elites in nine nations’, Comparative Political Studies 18: 267–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, R.J. (2017), ‘Party representation across multiple issue dimensions’, Party Politics 23: 609–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, R.J. and McAllister, I. (2015), ‘Random walk or planned excursion? Continuity and change in the left–right positions of political parties’, Comparative Political Studies 48: 759–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, C. and Marks, G. (2012), ‘The struggle over dimensionality: a note on theory and empirics’, European Union Politics 13: 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Vries, C.E. and Giger, N. (2014), ‘Holding governments accountable? Individual heterogeneity in performance voting’, European Journal of Political Research 53: 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolezal, M., Eder, N., Kritzinger, S. and Zeglovits, E. (2013), ‘The structure of issue attitudes revisited: a dimensional analysis of Austrian voters and party elites’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 23: 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolný, B. and Baboš, P. (2015), ‘Voter–representative congruence in Europe: a loss of institutional influence?’, West European Politics, 38: 1274–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, M. and Lefkofridi, Z. (2014), Economic & Political Inequality in Modern Democracies: Differential Responsiveness to the Policy Preferences of Economic Classes, Florence: MWP Red number series, Florence.Google Scholar
Döring, H. and Manow, P. (2016), Parliament and government composition database (ParlGov): an infrastructure for empirical information on parties, elections and governments in modern democracies.Google Scholar
Elsässer, L., Hense, S. and Schäfer, A. (2017), ‘Dem Deutschen Volke“? Die ungleiche Responsivität des Bundestags’, Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 27: 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Social Survey Cumulative File, ESS 1–7 (2016), ‘Data file edition 1.0’, NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway–Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
Ezrow, L. and Xezonakis, G. (2011), ‘Citizen satisfaction with democracy and parties’ policy offerings’, Comparative Political Studies 44: 1152–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferland, B. (2016), ‘Revisiting the ideological congruence controversy’, European Journal of Political Research 55: 358–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, A. and Belchior, A. (2013), ‘Ideological representation in Portugal: MPs’– electors’ linkages in terms of left–right placement and substantive meaning’, The Journal of Legislative Studies 19: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, A. and Belchior, A.M. (2011), ‘What left and right means to Portuguese citizens’, Comparative European Politics 9: 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganghof, S. (2015), ‘Four visions of democracy: Powell’s elections as instruments of democracy and BEYOND’, Political Studies Review 13: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, A.L. and Bennett, A. (2005), Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Giger, N., Rosset, J. and Bernauer, J. (2012), ‘The poor representation of the poor in a comparative perspective’, Representation 48: 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, M. (2012), Affluence and Influence, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, M. and Stramski, J. (2010), ‘Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions’, American Journal of Political Science 54: 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakhverdian, A. (2015), ‘Does it matter that most representatives are higher educated?’, Swiss Political Science Review 21: 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakhverdian, A., Van Elsas, E., Van der Brug, W. et al. (2013), ‘Euroscepticism and education: a longitudinal study of 12 EU member states, 1973–2010’, European Union Politics 14: 522–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J.D. and Powell, G.B. Jr (1994), ‘Congruence between citizens and policymakers in two visions of liberal democracy’, World Politics 46: 291–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T. (2006), ‘Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: six European countries compared’, European Journal of Political Research 45: 921–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M. and Shepsle, K.A. (1996), Making and Breaking Governments. Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lax, J.R. and Phillips, J.H. (2012), ‘The democratic deficit in the states’, American Journal of Political Science 56: 148–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefkofridi, Z. and Horvath, K. (2012), ‘Migration issues and representation in European liberal democracies’, Representation 48: 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesschaeve, C. (2017), ‘Finding inequality in an unlikely place: differences in policy congruence between social groups in Belgium’, Acta Politica 52: 361–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, P. (2009), ‘Representative versus responsible Government’, MPIfG Working Paper 09/8.Google Scholar
Martin, L.W. and Vanberg, G. (2011), Parliaments and Coalitions. The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L.W. and Vanberg, G. (2014), ‘Parties and policymaking in multiparty governments: the legislative median, ministerial autonomy, and the coalition compromise’, American Journal of Political Science 58: 979–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, M. and Raunio, T. (2006), ‘Cautious voters-supportive parties opinion congruence between voters and parties on the EU dimension’, European Union Politics 7: 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayne, Q. and Hakhverdian, A. (2017), ‘Ideological congruence and citizen satisfaction: evidence from 25 advanced democracies’, Comparative Political Studies 50: 822–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, M.D. and Budge, I. (2005), Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, A.J. (2006), The Logic of Democracy. Reconciling Equality, Deliberation, and Minority Protection, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munzert, S. and Bauer, P.C. (2013), ‘Political depolarization in German public opinion, 1980–2010’, Political Science Research and Methods 1: 67–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Y. and Ensink, S.J. (2015), ‘Differential responsiveness in Europe: the effects of preference difference and electoral participation’, West European Politics 38: 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, R. (1999), Mass-elite issue linkage and the responsible party model of representation, in Miller, W.E. (ed.), Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Polk, J., Rovny, J., Bakker, R., Edwards, E., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Koedam, J., Kostelka, F., Marks, G., Schumacher, G. and Steenbergen, M. (2017), ‘Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data’, Research & Politics 4: 2053168016686915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pontusson, J. (2015), ‘Introduction to the debate: does descriptive misrepresentation by income and class matter?’, Swiss Political Science Review 21: 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G.B. (2000), Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G.B. (2009), ‘The ideological congruence controversy: The impact of alternative measures, data, and time periods on the effects of election rules’, Comparative Political Studies 42: 1475–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reher, S. (2015), ‘Explaining cross-national variation in the relationship between priority congruence and satisfaction with democracy’, European Journal of Political Research 54: 160–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, P. (2009), ‘Risks and redistribution: an individual-level analysis’, Comparative Political Studies 42: 855–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosset, J. (2013), ‘Are the policy preferences of relatively poor citizens under-represented in the Swiss Parliament?’, The Journal of Legislative Studies 19: 490–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosset, J. (2016), Economic Inequality and Political Representation in Switzerland, Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosset, J., Lutz, G. and Kissau, K. (2016), Representation of political opinions: is the structuring pattern of policy preferences the same for citizens and elites? in Bühlmann, M. and Fivaz, J. (eds.), Political Representation. Roles, Representatives and the Represented. London: Routledge, pp. 117–134.Google Scholar
Schäfer, A. (2015), Der Verlust politischer Gleichheit. Warum die sinkende Wahlbeteiligung der Demokratie schadet, Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
Schmitt, H., Hobolt, S.B., Popa, S.A., Teperoglou, E. and European Parliament, Directorate-General for Communication, Public Monitoring Unit (2016), European Parliament Election Study 2014, Voter Study, First Post-Election Survey. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne.Google Scholar
Stecker, C. and Tausendpfund, M. (2016), ‘Multidimensional government-citizen congruence and satisfaction with democracy’, European Journal of Political Research 55: 492–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubager, R. (2006), The Education Cleavage: New Politics in Denmark, Aarhus: Politica.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J.L., Walsh, P., Shamir, M. et al. (1993), ‘Why politicians are more tolerant: selective recruitment and socialization among political elites in Britain, Israel, New Zealand and the United States’, British Journal of Political Science 23: 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomassen, J. (1994), Empirical research into political representation: failing democracy or failing models, in Jennings, M.K. and Mann, T.E. (eds.) Elections at Home and Abroad: Essays in Honor of Warren E. Miller. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Thomassen, J. (2012), ‘The blind corner of political representation’, Representation 48: 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomassen, J. and Schmitt, H. (1997), ‘Policy representation’, European Journal of Political Research 32: 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, H. and Weale, A. (2010), ‘Is rule by majorities special?’, Political Studies 58: 26–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, P.V. (2001), ‘Coalition policy in parliamentary democracies: who gets how much and why’, Comparative Political Studies 34: 1212–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Rosset and Stecker supplementary material

Rosset and Stecker supplementary material 1

Download Rosset and Stecker supplementary material(File)
File 1.5 MB