Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:52:41.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Avoiding Negligence and Profusion: The Failure of the Joint-Stock Form in the Anglo-Indian Tea Trade, 1840–1870

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2015

MICHAEL ALDOUS*
Affiliation:
Michael Aldous is a Ph.D. candidate at the London School of Economic and Political Science. Contact information: Department of Economic History, London School of Economic and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. E-mail: michaelaldous@hotmail.com.

Abstract

In the nineteenth century, firms operating in the Anglo-Indian tea trade were organized using a variety of ownership forms, including partnership, joint-stock, and a combination of the two, known as the managing agency. Faced with both an increasing need for fixed capital and high agency costs caused by the distance between owners and managers, the firms adapted and increasingly adopted the hybrid managing agency model to overcome these problems. Using new data from Calcutta and Bengal Commercial Registers and detailed case studies of the Assam Company and Gillanders, Arbuthnot and Co., this article demonstrates that British entrepreneurs did not see the choice of ownership as a dichotomy or firm boundaries as fixed, but instead drew innovatively on the strengths of different forms of ownership to compete and grow successfully.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author 2015. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Business History Conference. All rights reserved. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Works Cited

Books

Antrobus, H. The History of the Assam Company 1839–1953. Edinburgh: Constable Ltd, 1957.Google Scholar
Antrobus, H. A History of the Jorehaut Tea Co. Ltd 1858–1943. London: Tea and Rubber Mail, 1948.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred. Scale and Scope: Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, Alfred. The Visible Hand: Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Chapman, Stanley. Merchant Enterprise in Britain: From the Industrial Revolution to World War I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Crafts, Nicholas. British Economic Growth during the Industrial Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Gladstone, John. History of Gillanders, Arbuthnot & Co and Ogilvy Gillanders & Co. Published privately, 1910.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Percival. The History of the Indian Tea Industry. London: Cloves and Son, 1967.Google Scholar
Harris, Ron. Industrializing English Law: Entrepreneurship and Business Organization, 1720–1844. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Jones, Geoffrey. Merchants to Multinationals: British Trading Companies in the 19th and 20th Centuries. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Jones, Stephanie. Merchants of the Raj: British Managing Agency Houses in Calcutta Yesterday and Today. London: Palgrave McMillan, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonker, Joost and Sluyterman, Keetie. At Home on the World Markets: Dutch International Trading Companies from the 16th Century until the Present. The Hague: Sdu Uitgevers, 2000.Google Scholar
Kling, Blair. Partner in Empire: Dwarkanath Tagore and the Age of Enterprise in Eastern India. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Lokanathan, P. Industrial Organization in India. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1935.Google Scholar
Misra, Maria. Business, Race, and Politics in British India, c. 1850–1960. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Brian. British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Ray, Indrajit. Bengal Industries and the British Industrial Revolution. New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Roy, Tirthankar. The Economic History of India 1857–1947. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Rungta, Radhe. The Rise of the Business Corporation in India 1851–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Sircar, Kalyan. A Tale of Two Boards: Some Early Management Problems of Assam Company Limited, 1839–1864. Bombay: Sameeksha Trust, 1986.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Stavacre, F.Tea and Tea Dealing. London: Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons Ltd, 1929.Google Scholar
Tripathi, Amales. Trade and Finance in the Bengal Presidency 1793–1833. Calcutta: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Webster, Anthony. The Richest East India Merchant, the life and business of John Palmer of Calcutta 1767–1836. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Wilkins, Mira, and Schröter, Harn (eds.). The Free Standing Company in the World Economy, 1830 to 1996. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: The Free Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Articles and Essays

Acheson, Graeme, Campbell, Gareth, Turner, John, and Vanteeva, Nadia. “Corporate Ownership and Control in Victorian Britain.” European Association for Banking and Financial History Papers 14–02 (2014).Google Scholar
Akerlof, George. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84, no. 3 (1970): 488500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alchian, Armen, and Demsetz, Harold. “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization.” The American Economic Review 62, no. 5 (1972): 777795.Google Scholar
Boot, H. M. “Real Incomes of the British Middle Class, 1760–1850: The Experience of Clerks at the East India Company.” Economic History Review 52, no. 4 (1999): 638668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Stanley. “British Free-Standing Companies and Investment Groups in India and the Far East.” In The Free Standing Company in the World Economy, 1830 to 1996, edited by Wilkins, Mira and Schröter, Harm, 202218. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Stanley. “British Marketing Enterprise: The Changing Roles of Merchants, Manufacturers, and Financiers, 1700–1860.” The Business History Review 53, no. 2 (1979): 205234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dejung, Christof. “Worldwide Ties: The Role of Family Business in Global Trade in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.” Business History 55, no. 6 (2013): 10011018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinnane, Timothy. “Cooperatives as Information Machines: German Rural Credit Cooperatives, 1883–1914.” Journal of Economic History 61, no. 2 (2001): 366389.Google Scholar
Hannah, Leslie. “Marshall’s ‘Trees’ and the Global ‘Forest’: Were Giant Redwoods Different?” In Learning by Doing in Markets, Firms, and Countries, edited by Lamoreaux, Naomi, Raff, Daniel, and Temin, Peter, 253293. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Henriksen, Ingrid. “Avoiding Lock-In: Cooperative Creameries in Denmark, 1882–1903.” European Review of Economic History 3, no. 1 (1999): 5778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilt, Eric. “Incentives in Corporations: Evidence from the American Whaling Industry.” Journal of Law and Economics 49, no. 1 (2006): 197227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Geoffrey and Wale, Judith. “Merchants as Business Groups: British Trading Companies in Asia before 1945.” Business History Review 72, no. 3 (1998): 367408.Google Scholar
Kaukiainen, Yrjo. “Shrinking the World: Improvements in the Speed of Information Transmission, 1820–1870.” European Review of Economic History 5, no. 1 (2001): 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kling, Blair. “The Origin of the Managing Agency System in India.” The Journal of Asian Studies 26, no. 1 (1966): 3747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranton, Rachel, and Swamy, Anand. “Contracts, Hold-Up, and Exports: Textiles and Opium in Colonial India.” American Economic Review 98, no. 3 (2008): 967989.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert. “Investor Protection and Corporate Governance.” Journal of Financial Economics 58, no. 1 (2000): 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi, Raff, Daniel, and Temin, Peter. “Beyond Markets and Hierarchies: Towards a New Synthesis of American Business History.” American Historical Review 108, no. 2 (2003): 404433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi, and Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent. “Contractual Tradeoffs and SMEs’ Choice of Organizational Form: A View from U.S. and French history, 1830–2000.” NBER Working Paper 12455 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, Guinanne, Timothy, and Harris, Ron. “Putting the Corporation in Its Place.” Enterprise and Society 8, no. 3 (2007): 687729.Google Scholar
Leonard, Karen. “Palmer and Company: An Indian Banking Firm in Hyderabad State.” Modern Asian Studies 47, no. 4 (2013): 11571184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Tirthankar. “Indigo and the Law.” Economic History Review 64, no. 1 (2011): 6075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rungta, , , Radhe Shyam. “Indian Company Law Problems in 1850.” American Journal of Legal History 6, no. 3 (1962): 298308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, Anthony. “An Early Global Business in a Colonial Context: The Strategies, Management and Failure of John Palmer and Co of Calcutta.” Enterprise and Society 6, no. 1 (2005): 98133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Oliver. “The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes.” Journal of Economic Literature 19, no. 4 (1981): 15371568.Google Scholar

Archival Sources

Barings Archive (BA) HC2 Statistics of General Trade series and HC6 correspondence relating to Gisborne and Co. in the Indian subcontinent, Far East and Australasia series.Google Scholar
British Library (BL) OIR 954.14 ST 1216 CH Calcutta and Bengal Commercial registers.Google Scholar
Glynne-Gladstone (GG) Paper related to Ogilvy, Gillanders and Co. and Arbuthnot, Gillanders and Co.Google Scholar
London Metropolitan Archives (LMA) Papers related to the Assam Company Ltd.Google Scholar
The Post Office London Directory 1841.Google Scholar