Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:55:59.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flow and fouling in a pleated membrane filter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2016

P. Sanaei
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102-1982, USA
G. W. Richardson
Affiliation:
Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
T. Witelski
Affiliation:
Mathematics Department, Duke University, Box 90320, Durham, NC 27708-0320, USA
L. J. Cummings*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102-1982, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: Linda.Cummings@njit.edu

Abstract

Pleated membrane filters are widely used in many applications, and offer significantly better surface area to volume ratios than equal-area unpleated membrane filters. However, their filtration characteristics are markedly inferior to those of equivalent unpleated membrane filters in dead-end filtration. While several hypotheses have been advanced for this, one possibility is that the flow field induced by the pleating leads to spatially non-uniform fouling of the filter, which in turn degrades performance. In this paper we investigate this hypothesis by developing a simplified model for the flow and fouling within a pleated membrane filter. Our model accounts for the pleated membrane geometry (which affects the flow), for porous support layers surrounding the membrane, and for two membrane fouling mechanisms: (i) adsorption of very small particles within membrane pores; and (ii) blocking of entire pores by large particles. We use asymptotic techniques based on the small pleat aspect ratio to solve the model, and we compare solutions to those for the closest-equivalent unpleated filter.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolton, G. R., Boesch, A. W. D. & Lazzara, M. J. 2006 The effect of flow rate on membrane capacity: development and application of adsorptive membrane fouling models. J. Membr. Sci. 279, 625634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, G., LaCasse, D. & Kuriyel, R. 2006 Combined models of membrane fouling: development and application to microfiltration and ultrafiltration of biological fluids. J. Membr. Sci. 277, 7584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. I.2011a An ultra scale-down approach to the rapid evaluation of pleated membrane cartridge filter performance. DE thesis, University College London.Google Scholar
Brown, A. I. 2011b Scale-down prediction of industrial scale pleated membrane cartridge performance. Biotechnol. Bioengng 108 (4), 830838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, A. I., Levison, P., Titchener-Hooker, N. J. & Lye, G. J. 2009 Membrane pleating effects in 0. 2 μm rated microfiltration cartridges. J. Membr. Sci. 341, 7683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniel, R. C., Billing, J. M., Russell, R. L., Shimskey, R. W., Smith, H. D. & Peterson, R. A. 2011 Integrated pore blockage-cake filtration model for crossflow filtration. Chem. Engng Res. Des. 89, 10941103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotovati, S., Hosseini, S. A., Vahedi Tafreshi, H. & Pourdeyhimi, B. 2011 Modeling instantaneous pressure drop of pleated thin filter media during dust loading. Chem. Engng Sci. 66, 40364046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giglia, S., Rautio, K., Kazan, G., Backes, K. & Blanchard, M. 2010 Improving the accuracy of scaling from discs to cartridges for dead end microfiltration of biological fluids. J. Membr. Sci. 365, 347355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giglia, S. & Straeffer, G. 2012 Combined mechanism fouling model and method for optimization of series microfiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 417‐418, 144153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. R. & Please, C. P. 1996 Asymptotic analysis of the growth of cake layers in filters. IMA J. Appl. Maths. 57, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A. 2009 Effect of prefiltration on scalability of 0. 1 𝜇m-rated membrane filters. Bioprocess International, Industry Yearbook, vol. 7, part 7, pp. 129130.Google Scholar
Kumar, A., Martin, J. & Kuriyel, R. 2015 Scale-up of sterilizing-grade membrane filters from discs to pleated cartridges: effects of operating parameters and solution properties. PDA J. Pharm. Sci. Tech. 69, 7487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meng, F., Chae, S.-R., Drews, A., Kraume, M., Shin, H.-S. & Yang, F. 2009 Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res. 43, 14891512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pall 2013 Corporation Power Generation Catalog, available at http://www.pall.com/pdfs/Power-Generation/PowerGeneration_Catalog.pdf.Google Scholar
van der Sman, R. G. M., Vollebregt, H. M., Mepschen, A. & Noordman, T. R. 2012 Review of hypotheses for fouling during beer clarification using membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 396, 2231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar